When
should the legislator use a sledgehammer to crack a nut (in more
senses than one)?
When
we advance from the existential importance of fundamental rights to a
few lines about the colloquium, I have to admit to a lingering doubt
about how intrusive criminal law should become.
I
hope that bright thinkers contribute to the cross-border discussion
in Europe, since similar problems confront the European and the
national level.
Věra
Jourová
-
It
is high time that member
states
fully implemented EU law to combat racism and xenophobia. I intend to
take decisive actions to monitor this implementation and will focus
on three points. First of all, member
states
must firmly and immediately investigate and prosecute racist hatred
and violence. Second, I find it disgraceful that Holocaust denial is
a criminal offence in only 13 member
states.
Last but not least, member
states
must decisively address hate speech, said
the EU justice commissioner Věra
Jourová
in
her closing remarks at
the Commission's first colloquium on fundamental rights.
Hopefully
her openness about the Commission's aims serves the purpose of a
wider and improved discussion about the merits of justice policy and
criminal law to advance societal aims. Commissioner
Jourová promised a number of other actions to
counter antisemitism and islamophobia, as
well, some more and some less controversial.
Fundamental
rights colloquium
Through
the web page of the European Commission's first annual fundamental rights colloquium 1-2 October 2015 you can access material, including
the thematic discussion notes to steer the discussions. The notes
offer you a fairly detailed view of the issues at
the colloquium, but worth continued discussion in Europe more widely:
Ergo
As
you see, there are quite a number of related but separate issues
demanding individual treatment.
You
can follow, dig for material or participate under the Twitter hashtag
#NoPlace4Hate
Ralf Grahn