European elections: First-order voting weight

Just a quick thought, when various polls seem to promise abstention rates of 60 or 66 per cent at the June 2009 European elections:

If you belong to the four out of ten EU citizens who cast their ballots, your vote will count two and a half times compared to the potential turn-out.

In other words, first-rate voting weight for second-order elections.

***

As Clausewitz would have said: The European Union is too important to be left to the member states’ governments.

With the Lisbon Treaty the European Parliament would further gain in importance, although the march to EU level democracy promises to be long.


Ralf Grahn

Lisbon Treaty & European Council: Consensus or unanimity?

The European Council primarily takes decisions which are politically (not legally) binding, such as Presidency Conclusions, declarations and guidelines. Its mode of operation can be seen as consensus seeking. Basically, the political texts can be watered down until consensus is reached.

One of the tasks of the new President of the European Council would be to facilitate cohesion and consensus within the European Council.

***

Consensus

In the Treaty of Lisbon, Article 15(4) of the amended Treaty on European Union (TEU) presents the main rule for decision-making:


Article 15(4) (Lisbon Treaty)


4. Except where the Treaties provide otherwise, decisions of the European Council shall be taken by consensus.


(OJEU 9.5.2008 C 115/23)


***

Consensus or unanimity?

Is there a real difference between consensus and unanimity? Unanimity may evoke feelings of a harsher requirement, but abstentions by members present in person or represented shall not prevent the adoption by the European Council of acts which require unanimity (Article 235(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; TFUE).

Consensus can seem softer, since it can generally denote both unanimity and ‘the judgment arrived at by most of those concerned’. But as far as I understand, consensus is interpreted as the absence of specific opposition, which makes it practically equal to the definition of unanimity above.

The Lisbon Treaty employs both terms in conjunction with the European Council.

My preliminary feeling is that the differences mainly concern nuances, with consensus seeking seen as a general approach to reach mutual understanding, whereas unanimity denotes more formal situations (acts), where explicit abstentions can pave the way for decisions.


People wiser than me have delved into these questions, so I am grateful for viewpoints from readers.

In the following posts we are going to look at how the terms consensus and unanimous (by unanimity) have been employed in the Lisbon Treaty. Are there obvious differences?


Ralf Grahn