Eur-Lex, the legal portal of the European Union, offers an incredible amount of serious information about the EU. The centerpiece is the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU), where the legislation and other official acts are published.
While press releases, multimedia presentations and news reporting cover the instant information needs, the published acts and proposals are the primary sources for practitioners and serious students of European Union affairs.
Here is how Eur-Lex describes the available documentation:
About EUR-Lex
EUR-Lex provides free access to European Union law and other documents considered to be public. The website is available in 23 official languages of the European Union; choose your preferred language from the language bar at the top of the homepage.
The contents of the site amount to some 3 600 000 documents with texts dating back to 1951. The database is updated daily and every year around 15 000 documents are added.
EUR-Lex offers:
• daily editions of the Official Journal of the European Union online,
• simple search, advanced search and browsing options,
• the possibility to display and/or download documents (PDF, HTML, DOC, TIFF),
• analytical metadata for each document.
I would like to access the Official Journal of the European Union
The Official Journal of the European Union is the principal source of EUR-Lex content and it is published in the early morning after every working day. It consists of two series: L (Legislation) and C (Information and Notices). E and A are Official Journals published as annexes to the C series (e.g. C 307 A, C 309 E).
Latest issues are accessible from the homepage; click on the links in the upper right-hand corner, just under the language bar.
Previous issues can be found by clicking on the OFFICIAL JOURNAL link on top of the left-hand menu. You can find an issue of the Official Journal by browsing or by searching. All issues from 1998 onwards are available in PDF. To access texts published before 1998, use the SIMPLE SEARCH – Search by publication reference (Official Journal).
I would like to search for a document
There are two search interfaces in EUR-Lex; SIMPLE SEARCH and ADVANCED SEARCH. While advanced search provides a fuller range of search and display features, simple search will accommodate most users’ requirements.
You have a wide range of search options; search by search terms, search by date, search by author, search by natural number, etc.
Another option is to browse our collections and directories; choose from treaties, international agreements, legislation in force, preparatory acts, case-law and parliamentary questions. Each of the aforementioned sectors offers a browsing feature, such as the Directory of Community legislation in force.
What do I do with my search result?
You have direct access to all the documents in your list of search results; just click on your preferred format. You can also check which languages and formats are available, display complementary data, sort or refine your search result to get more relevant documents (find these options on the yellow bar and/or the search box). You can review and/or combine the queries made in one session by clicking on Search history.
To get more information on a document follow the link ‘bibliographic notice’ (example). The notice is a display of metadata (author, dates, indexes, form, related documents, etc.) which provides insight into each document and shows relationships between documents. For bilingual display of a document follow the link Bibliographic notice + Text (bilingual display).
EUR-Lex also offers consolidated versions of documents (where available). These versions are intended for documentation purposes only and have no legal value. Find them in the bibliographic notice or by browsing the Directory of Community legislation in force.
What else can I do?
You can read about EU law, the legislative procedures and EU institutions. You can consult the selection of new documents on the homepage or consult our thematic files.
EUR-Lex also offers links to the budget of the European Union, the institutions’ registers and other documentation and information sources.
New developments are announced in our Newsletter.
Ralf Grahn
Showing posts with label access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label access. Show all posts
Thursday, 28 May 2009
Tuesday, 6 January 2009
EU Law: Supplementary research programmes
In addition to the general European Community (European Union) Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (now FP7) and the specific programmes implementing it – Cooperation, Ideas, People, Capacities and the Joint Research Council – there exists an option to agree on supplementary programmes involving the participation of certain Member States only.
We are reminded of this optional instrument both at treaty level and by the secondary legislation concerning the FP7, running from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.
***
Article 168 TEC
Article 168 (ex Article 130k) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) concerns supplementary programmes for research and technological development involving only some member states.
The supplementary programmes are primarily financed by the participating states. The Council decides on rules with regard to dissemination of knowledge and access by other member states.
The current Article 168 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), as published in the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJEU 29.12.2006 C 321 E/122:
(TITLE XVIII
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT)
Article 168 TEC
In implementing the multiannual framework programme, supplementary programmes may be decided on involving the participation of certain Member States only, which shall finance them subject to possible Community participation.
The Council shall adopt the rules applicable to supplementary programmes, particularly as regards the dissemination of knowledge and access by other Member States.
***
Original Lisbon Treaty (ToL)
Article 2, point 140 of the Lisbon Treaty amended Article 168 TEC (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/86):
140) In Article 168, second paragraph, the words ‘the Council’ shall be replaced by ‘the Union’.
***
Renumbering the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL)
The Table of equivalences of the original Treaty of Lisbon tells us that Title XVIII first became Title XVIII with the addition of space in the TFEU (ToL), and later renumbered Title XIX Research and technological development and space in the consolidated version.
Article 168 TEC initially became Article 168 TFEU (ToL) before the renumbering of the treaty made it into Article 184 TFEU in the consolidated version of the Lisbon Treaty (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/217–218).
***
Lisbon Treaty consolidated
Article 184 TFEU
After one specific amendments and renumbering Article 184 TFEU appears like this in the consolidated version of the Treaty of Lisbon (OJEU 9.5.2008 C 115/130):
(TITLE XIX
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE)
Article 184 TFEU
(ex Article 168 TEC)
In implementing the multiannual framework programme, supplementary programmes may be decided on involving the participation of certain Member States only, which shall finance them subject to possible Union participation.
The Union shall adopt the rules applicable to supplementary programmes, particularly as regards the dissemination of knowledge and access by other Member States.
***
FP7 – Seventh Framework Programme (2007–2013)
Having looked at the treaty level, we move on to supplementary research programmes in practice.
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013), published in OJEU 30.12.2006 L 412/1, is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:412:0001:0041:EN:PDF
Although the treaty provision on supplementary programmes has its historical roots and causes, including limited use, here we are interested in the possible existence of such EU research programmes.
Recital 26 of the FP7 Decision 1982/2006 refers to supplementary programmes:
(26) Implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme may give rise to supplementary programmes involving the participation of certain Member States only, the participation of the Community in programmes undertaken by several Member States, or the setting up of joint undertakings or other arrangements within the meaning of Articles 168, 169 and 171 of the Treaty.
***
In other words, the FP7 Decision treats supplementary research programmes as a potential instrument.
***
Rules on supplementary programmes?
Is the text of the FP7 Decision Recital 26 just a reminder of an existing optional instrument, or are there more detailed rules in existence governing the use of supplementary programmes?
The rules for participation and for dissemination of research results are set out in Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013), published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 391/1:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:391:0001:0018:EN:PDF
I found no mention of supplementary research programmes in Regulation 1906/2006. This indicates that the treaty provision sets the legal framework for the potential use of supplementary programmes. The legal act or acts would probably be drafted according to the objectives, the participants and other circumstances, drawing on existing EC (EU) research Decisions, Regulations and practices.
***
Specific programmes
The Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) is implemented through specific programmes. The possibility of supplementary programmes is mentioned in the context of the FP7 or the specific programme in question, but we leave it to the interested reader to dig more deeply.
Note that the specific programmes initially published have been corrected and the corrigenda published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 22 February 2007 L 54. The links in earlier posts have been replaced below.
Cooperation programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/971/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme "Cooperation" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/86. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/30 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0030:0080:EN:PDF
***
Ideas programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/972/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme: "Ideas" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published in OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/243. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/81 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0081:0090:EN:PDF
***
People programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/973/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme "People" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), was initially published in OJEU 2006 L 400. Here is a link to the corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/91:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0091:0100:EN:PDF
***
Capacities programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/974/EC of 19 December 2006 on the Specific Programme: "Capacities" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/299. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/101 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0101:0125:EN:PDF
***
Joint Research Centre
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/975/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme to be carried out by means of direct actions by the Joint Research Centre under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/368. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/126 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0126:0138:EN:PDF
Ralf Grahn
We are reminded of this optional instrument both at treaty level and by the secondary legislation concerning the FP7, running from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2013.
***
Article 168 TEC
Article 168 (ex Article 130k) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) concerns supplementary programmes for research and technological development involving only some member states.
The supplementary programmes are primarily financed by the participating states. The Council decides on rules with regard to dissemination of knowledge and access by other member states.
The current Article 168 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), as published in the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJEU 29.12.2006 C 321 E/122:
(TITLE XVIII
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT)
Article 168 TEC
In implementing the multiannual framework programme, supplementary programmes may be decided on involving the participation of certain Member States only, which shall finance them subject to possible Community participation.
The Council shall adopt the rules applicable to supplementary programmes, particularly as regards the dissemination of knowledge and access by other Member States.
***
Original Lisbon Treaty (ToL)
Article 2, point 140 of the Lisbon Treaty amended Article 168 TEC (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/86):
140) In Article 168, second paragraph, the words ‘the Council’ shall be replaced by ‘the Union’.
***
Renumbering the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL)
The Table of equivalences of the original Treaty of Lisbon tells us that Title XVIII first became Title XVIII with the addition of space in the TFEU (ToL), and later renumbered Title XIX Research and technological development and space in the consolidated version.
Article 168 TEC initially became Article 168 TFEU (ToL) before the renumbering of the treaty made it into Article 184 TFEU in the consolidated version of the Lisbon Treaty (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/217–218).
***
Lisbon Treaty consolidated
Article 184 TFEU
After one specific amendments and renumbering Article 184 TFEU appears like this in the consolidated version of the Treaty of Lisbon (OJEU 9.5.2008 C 115/130):
(TITLE XIX
RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND SPACE)
Article 184 TFEU
(ex Article 168 TEC)
In implementing the multiannual framework programme, supplementary programmes may be decided on involving the participation of certain Member States only, which shall finance them subject to possible Union participation.
The Union shall adopt the rules applicable to supplementary programmes, particularly as regards the dissemination of knowledge and access by other Member States.
***
FP7 – Seventh Framework Programme (2007–2013)
Having looked at the treaty level, we move on to supplementary research programmes in practice.
Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013), published in OJEU 30.12.2006 L 412/1, is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:412:0001:0041:EN:PDF
Although the treaty provision on supplementary programmes has its historical roots and causes, including limited use, here we are interested in the possible existence of such EU research programmes.
Recital 26 of the FP7 Decision 1982/2006 refers to supplementary programmes:
(26) Implementation of the Seventh Framework Programme may give rise to supplementary programmes involving the participation of certain Member States only, the participation of the Community in programmes undertaken by several Member States, or the setting up of joint undertakings or other arrangements within the meaning of Articles 168, 169 and 171 of the Treaty.
***
In other words, the FP7 Decision treats supplementary research programmes as a potential instrument.
***
Rules on supplementary programmes?
Is the text of the FP7 Decision Recital 26 just a reminder of an existing optional instrument, or are there more detailed rules in existence governing the use of supplementary programmes?
The rules for participation and for dissemination of research results are set out in Regulation (EC) No 1906/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 laying down the rules for the participation of undertakings, research centres and universities in actions under the Seventh Framework Programme and for the dissemination of research results (2007-2013), published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 391/1:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:391:0001:0018:EN:PDF
I found no mention of supplementary research programmes in Regulation 1906/2006. This indicates that the treaty provision sets the legal framework for the potential use of supplementary programmes. The legal act or acts would probably be drafted according to the objectives, the participants and other circumstances, drawing on existing EC (EU) research Decisions, Regulations and practices.
***
Specific programmes
The Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) is implemented through specific programmes. The possibility of supplementary programmes is mentioned in the context of the FP7 or the specific programme in question, but we leave it to the interested reader to dig more deeply.
Note that the specific programmes initially published have been corrected and the corrigenda published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 22 February 2007 L 54. The links in earlier posts have been replaced below.
Cooperation programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/971/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme "Cooperation" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/86. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/30 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0030:0080:EN:PDF
***
Ideas programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/972/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme: "Ideas" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published in OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/243. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/81 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0081:0090:EN:PDF
***
People programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/973/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the specific programme "People" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), was initially published in OJEU 2006 L 400. Here is a link to the corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/91:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0091:0100:EN:PDF
***
Capacities programme
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/974/EC of 19 December 2006 on the Specific Programme: "Capacities" implementing the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/299. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/101 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0101:0125:EN:PDF
***
Joint Research Centre
COUNCIL DECISION 2006/975/EC of 19 December 2006 concerning the Specific Programme to be carried out by means of direct actions by the Joint Research Centre under the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007 to 2013), initially published OJEU 30.12.2006 L 400/368. The corrigendum OJEU 22.2.2007 L 54/126 is available here:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:054:0126:0138:EN:PDF
Ralf Grahn
Thursday, 1 November 2007
Sweden and Finland: transparency
Sweden and Finland want to be known as champions of openness in the European Union. They have called for more transparency when Regulation (1049/2001) on public access to documents is being revised.
Here are some of the principles the Finnish government has underlined:
Finland considers that it is important to promote transparency and good administration in the European Union, as well as to increase citizens’ possibilities to obtain information and participate in the decision-making. Finland takes the view that widest possible access should be granted to legislative documents, including documents that have an impact on the legislative process. Also, citizens must be given information on the Union and its activities in a more user-friendly way.
When the Swedish government responded to the EU Commission’s Green Paper, Minister of Justice Beatrice Ask emphasized that the revision was an opportunity to advance the cause of transparency in the European Union.
***
We have seen how Sweden and Finland have chosen to position themselves regarding openness or transparency in the European Union.
The basic treaties are the most important documents in the European Union, even if the Reform Treaty or Lisbon Treaty is not called a Constitution.
Nobody can understand the European Union as a whole with the help of only the amendments contained in the new EU Treaty and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The new and the present treaties have to be consolidated in order to offer the reader even a chance to understand the basic rules of the Union. In this case the consolidated version will show the present treaties updated with the proposed amendments.
This is the most important communication task for the European Union for quite a while. If the European Union institutions and the member state governments want to retain any credibility concerning their rules and words on transparency, openness and access to information, they have to publish the consolidated Reform Treaty at once.
***
The Swedish and the Finnish governments have these two choices:
First, the governments should convince the Council of the EU to publish the complete consolidated treaties on its web site in all the official languages of the European Union. Only this guarantees equal treatment of all the citizens of the Union and information accessible to all. Only instant publication gives the citizens correct, sufficient and user-friendly information to understand and discuss the proposed treaty changes. Web publishing can be done instantly and possible later precisions can be added in real time. Printed compilations may follow later.
If the Council does not publish the consolidated treaties at once, Sweden, Finland and every government with a true belief in openness has to make them accessible to its own citizens, now. The same recipe should be followed: instant web publication; print may follow.
There are two possibilities for the governments: Convince the Council or publish yourself.
Ralf Grahn
Sources:
Finland wants to promote transparency in the EU; Ministry of Justice, 5 July 2007; http://www.vn.fi/
The response of Finland to the Commission’s Green Paper on the Revision of the Regulation on Public Access to Documents held by the institutions of the European Community; Ministry of Justice; http://www.om.fi/en/
Avoimuus ja Euroopan unioni; Valtioneuvosto; http://www.valtioneuvosto.fi/
EU; Avoimuus; Vihreä kirja yleisön oikeudesta tutustua yhteisöjen toimielinten hallussa oleviin asiakirjoihin annetun asetuksen tarkistamisesta; EU-ministerivaliokunta 1.6.2007
Öppenhet och EU; http://www.regeringen.se/
Sverige fortsätter att arbeta för ökad öppenhet inom EU; Regeringskansliet, pressmeddelande 6.7.2007; http://www.regeringen.se/
Here are some of the principles the Finnish government has underlined:
Finland considers that it is important to promote transparency and good administration in the European Union, as well as to increase citizens’ possibilities to obtain information and participate in the decision-making. Finland takes the view that widest possible access should be granted to legislative documents, including documents that have an impact on the legislative process. Also, citizens must be given information on the Union and its activities in a more user-friendly way.
When the Swedish government responded to the EU Commission’s Green Paper, Minister of Justice Beatrice Ask emphasized that the revision was an opportunity to advance the cause of transparency in the European Union.
***
We have seen how Sweden and Finland have chosen to position themselves regarding openness or transparency in the European Union.
The basic treaties are the most important documents in the European Union, even if the Reform Treaty or Lisbon Treaty is not called a Constitution.
Nobody can understand the European Union as a whole with the help of only the amendments contained in the new EU Treaty and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The new and the present treaties have to be consolidated in order to offer the reader even a chance to understand the basic rules of the Union. In this case the consolidated version will show the present treaties updated with the proposed amendments.
This is the most important communication task for the European Union for quite a while. If the European Union institutions and the member state governments want to retain any credibility concerning their rules and words on transparency, openness and access to information, they have to publish the consolidated Reform Treaty at once.
***
The Swedish and the Finnish governments have these two choices:
First, the governments should convince the Council of the EU to publish the complete consolidated treaties on its web site in all the official languages of the European Union. Only this guarantees equal treatment of all the citizens of the Union and information accessible to all. Only instant publication gives the citizens correct, sufficient and user-friendly information to understand and discuss the proposed treaty changes. Web publishing can be done instantly and possible later precisions can be added in real time. Printed compilations may follow later.
If the Council does not publish the consolidated treaties at once, Sweden, Finland and every government with a true belief in openness has to make them accessible to its own citizens, now. The same recipe should be followed: instant web publication; print may follow.
There are two possibilities for the governments: Convince the Council or publish yourself.
Ralf Grahn
Sources:
Finland wants to promote transparency in the EU; Ministry of Justice, 5 July 2007; http://www.vn.fi/
The response of Finland to the Commission’s Green Paper on the Revision of the Regulation on Public Access to Documents held by the institutions of the European Community; Ministry of Justice; http://www.om.fi/en/
Avoimuus ja Euroopan unioni; Valtioneuvosto; http://www.valtioneuvosto.fi/
EU; Avoimuus; Vihreä kirja yleisön oikeudesta tutustua yhteisöjen toimielinten hallussa oleviin asiakirjoihin annetun asetuksen tarkistamisesta; EU-ministerivaliokunta 1.6.2007
Öppenhet och EU; http://www.regeringen.se/
Sverige fortsätter att arbeta för ökad öppenhet inom EU; Regeringskansliet, pressmeddelande 6.7.2007; http://www.regeringen.se/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)