Showing posts with label consultation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consultation. Show all posts

Monday, 30 January 2017

Focused and strategic approach ahead of the Single Market Act (2011)?

What did the contemporaries think about the fifty proposals of the consultation paper (green paper):
For a highly competitive social market economy
50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another
Brussels, 11.11.2010 COM(2010) 608 final/2 (45 pages)?


SEC(2011) 467

The different language versions of the Commission’s Single Market Act pages - English here - offer us links to three distilled documents about the public consultation.

First: On eight pages the first overview of responses gives us a picture of the 840 respondents and highlights some of the preferences of different stakeholder groups: individual citizens, trade unions, industry federations, individual companies, consumer organisations, non-governmental organisations, other organisations and public authorities.

Second: The statistical charts of the public consultation (44 pages) dealt with the 740 responses given on the Commission’s form.

Potentially interesting with regard to internal market challenges would be the 366 who thought that the green paper proposed adequate measures only partly; likewise the 245, 228 and 151 respectively for the different chapters wishing for other issues to be addressed.
Third: We are not directly invited by the SMA page to study the individual contributions, and the access page promised by the Commission Staff Working Paper (CSW) can not be found. Thus, we are restricted to the 32 pages of the CSW published, in English only, on the same day as the Single Market Act (SMA) communication:

Beside the statistical basics covered in the earlier documents, the discussion about the wishes of member states, local authorities and European Economic Area (EEA) countries offers us some interesting nuggets.  

In addition to many positive calls from industry federations with regard to ongoing actions or promised proposals, we take note of this paragraph (page 15):

A large number of respondents in this category welcome the comprehensive approach of the SMA. Some of them invite the European Commission to adopt a more focused and strategic approach, and to seek coherence with the other policy areas and the EU 2020 flagship initiatives.


Single Market Act

I did not notice that the Commission would have elaborated on the theme of  strategic level in the SEC(2011) 467 document, but perhaps we can hope that the Commission’s proper potential strategic level response was the communication published in the official EU languages (here to the English version):
   
Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence
"Working together to create new growth"
Brussels, 13.4.2011 COM(2011) 206 final (26 pages)


Ralf Grahn

Friday, 16 March 2012

Public consultation on EU Single Market Act (SMA)

In the article EU Towards a Single Market Act we looked at the basic choices of the communication 27.10.2010 COM(2010) 608 and the fifty proposals it sketched.


Public consultation

A number of events were organised during the consultation period, often with the commissioner Michel Barnier.

The results of the consultation on the Single Market Act (SMA) have been published, including an undated first overview of the 840 responses submitted in all, both online responses to the query and position papers (8 pages). The brief overview highlights priorities among different groups of respondents.


SEC(2011) 467

More information is offered by the Commission staff working paper:

Overview of responses to the public consultation on the Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act'; Brussels, 13.4.2011 SEC(2011) 467 final (32 pages; published only in English)

The numbers are crunched with regard to the responses using the online consultation tool, but the separate position papers where included in the qualitative assessments.

In principle, the more detailed assessment follows the structure of the first overview, by looking at the responses from the different respondent groups and their varying priorities.


50 proposed SMA actions

As a quick reminder of the proposals outlined in the communication Towards a Single Market Act, the overview of the consultation responses offers an annex (pages 31-32) where the actions are listed in short form.

ANNEX: THE 50 PROPOSED ACTIONS OF THE SINGLE MARKET ACT

1. EU patent
2. Copyright
3. Counterfeiting and piracy
4. Internal market for services
5. Electronic commerce
6. Standardisation
7. Integrated transport system
8. Energy taxation
9. Business-to-business services
10. Ecological footprint of products
11. Energy efficiency
12. SME access to finance
13. Small Business Act review
14. Accounting rules
15. Project bonds
16. Private investment and venture capital
17. Public procurement
18. Services concessions
19. Common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB)
20. VAT
21. Interconnection of business registers
22. E-identification/authentication
23. International trade
24. International public procurement
25. Services of general economic interest (SGEI)
26. Transport infrastructures
27. Energy infrastructures
28. European radiospectrum
29. Respect for fundamental social rights and social impact analysis of legislation
30. Posting of workers to other Member States
31. Pensions
32. Industrial restructuring
33. Recognition of professional qualifications
34. Student mobility
35. Recognising skills and training
36. Social business
37. Social innovation
38. Corporate governance
39. Product safety
40. Access to basic banking services
41. Responsible lending and borrowing
42. Tax obstacles for citizens
43. Passenger rights
44. Evaluating implementation of rules with Member States
45. Information exchange between public authorities (IMI)
46. Alternative dispute resolution and collective redress
47. National transposition of EU rules
48. Consultation and dialogue with civil society
49. One-stop-stop for information and assistance
50. Informal problem-solving tools
***

Our next destination, I think, should be the final Single Market Act (SMA).



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. Already multilingual Bloggingportal.eu aggregates the posts from 940 Euroblogs. They represent an important part of the emerging European online public space, discussion across national and linguistic borders. One of the most promising fresh entrants is the LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) blog, where Ronny Patz recently wrote about the EU blogosphere and called for more academics to spread the word about their research and to discuss their findings closer to real life.

Among the Euroblogs on Bloggingportal.eu you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), the Nordic Grahnblawg (written in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). I write and speak about democracy, institutional issues and EU politics, but increasingly about the challenges of growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making, issues at policy level.

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

EU Towards a Single Market Act

After looking at Your Single Market? and other introductory material, we turn to the communication (available in 22 languages) prepared under the responsibility of the internal market commissioner Michel Barnier. The English language version of the consultation paper:

Towards a Single Market Act: For a highly competitive social market economy - 50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another; Brussels, 27.10.2010 COM(2010) 608 final (45 pages)


Social market economy

The Lisbon Treaty defines the EU aim of a ”highly competitive social market economy” and the Monti report wanted to broaden the support for a relaunch of the single market, so it is hardly surprising that the Commission's discussion paper is presented as (page 3):

This is a social market economy approach, based on the assumption that a single market needs to enjoy the support of all market players: businesses, consumers and workers. In this way, the single market will allow Europe to become collectively competitive.


Single Market and EU2020

The internal market (single market) did not become an integral part of the Europe 2020 growth strategy (EU2020), nor was it labeled as a flagship initiative. So how does the communication deal with the relationship between the Single Market Act under construction and the EU2020 strategy? The page 4 fudge:

The relaunch of the single market is therefore an essential element of the EU 2020 strategy, which proposes seven flagship initiatives: (i) an innovation Union, (ii) youth on the move, (iii) a digital agenda for Europe, (iv) a resource-efficient Europe, (v) an industrial policy for the globalisation era, (vi) an agenda for new skills and jobs and (vii) a European platform to tackle poverty. An up-to-date single market is the common foundation of all these structures. It is the tool that will help them create growth and employment and in so doing give new impetus to intelligent, sustainable and inclusive growth, thereby increasing synergies between the various flagship initiatives. Certain elements of the flagship initiatives will help to structure the operation of the single market and are therefore measures for its relaunch. These measures are therefore included both in this Communication and the flagship initiatives, in particular the digital agenda for Europe, the Union of innovation and an industrial policy for the globalisation era.


Public consultation

The Commission announced a consultation period of four months, asking for contributions by 28 February 2011 (page 35). This would then lead to the next step, the definitive Single Market Act (SMA):

After this public debate, and based on the conclusions drawn from it, the Commission hopes that all of the European institutions will undertake, at the start of 2011, to make this Act and its 50 measures into the definitive policy action plan for 2011-2012. This will serve as a dynamic commemoration of the 20th anniversary of the single market at the end of 2012.

For the convenience of readers, the proposals sketched in the text are also listed at the end for a quick overview (pages 37-45).


EEA relevance

Naturally, the 50 individual proposals presented in the communication are of interest not only to the citizens and enterprises in the European Union, but to the rest of the European Economic Area (EEA) as well, 30 countries in all, with a total population of about 507 million.



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. Multilingual Bloggingportal.eu aggregates the posts from 940 Euroblogs, which represent an important part of the emerging European online public space, across national and linguistic borders. Among them you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), Grahnblawg (in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). Besides democracy, institutional issues and EU politics, I increasingly write and speak about the challenges of growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making.

Thursday, 20 October 2011

EU information society priorities revisited

Is it possible that Europeans do not believe in a real digital single market as a realistic possibility, but see just one more slogan in an endless bog of internal market tinkering?


European information society priorities

As I mentioned in the blog post EU Digital Agenda Public consultation 2009, one of the key documents on the road to the new ICT priorities of the Digital Agenda was the Summary of responses to the public consultation public consultation Priorities for a new strategy for European information society (2010-2015) (DG INFSO, 28 pages).

The public consultation was open from 4 August to 9 October 2009, but the summary is undated.

I am still worried about the proportionately low level of responses to the information society consultation from the Mediterranean EU member states Greece, Portugal and Spain we have seen so much in the news, as well as from the new member states which still have a huge need to catch up.


European information society themes

Rereading the consultation summary, I still feel it offers useful facts and views about the state of the European information society themes (page 5):

1) ICT for a growth and jobs agenda, 2) ICT for a sustainable 'low carbon' economy; 3) Improving Europe's performance in ICT research and innovation; 4) Creating a 100% connected society and economy through a high-speed and open internet for all; 5) Consolidating the online Single Market; 6) Promoting access to creativity at all levels; 7) Strengthening EU's role in the international ICT arena; 8) Making modern and efficient public services available and accessible to all; 9) Using ICT to improve the quality of life of EU citizens.

Online single market

In retrospect I am somewhat puzzled by the lack of interest, vision and ambition among both individual citizens and organisations relating to the online single market (nowadays often called the digital single market) as an ICT policy priority. See page 9.

Is it possible that Europeans do not believe in a real digital single market as a realistic possibility, but see it as just one more slogan in an endless bog of internal market tinkering?

In my view, a truly EU-wide digital single market would be a huge boost to European competitiveness and innovation and to most of the other worthy aims of the Digital Agenda for Europe.

Despite the low priority in the abstract, section 3.4 Digital Single Market (on pages 18-20) showed clear interest in issues presented in more concrete terms. Some of them, such as copyright legislation and licensing regimes which stifle innovative pan-European digital content services, are controversial.

***

All in all, in the context of the Europe 2020 growth strategy (EU2020) revisiting the ICT priorities through the EU information society consultation felt like a wortwhile exercise, not a waste of time.



Ralf Grahn

Friday, 22 October 2010

EU Green Paper on e-procurement

The European Commission has launched a consultation on expanding the use of electronic procurement in the internal market: European Commission acts to expand the use of e-procurement in the EU (18 October 2010, press release IP/10/1347; in English, French and German).

According to internal market and services commissioner Michel Barnier, the use of information and communication technology in public procurement increases the speed and efficiency of public purchasing while significantly cutting the costs when participating in tenders.

As often, the Commission offers background information in the form of FAQs: Frequently asked questions: e-Procurement (18 October 2010, MEMO/10/499; only in English).

The Public procurement main page of the Commission offers thematic links to various aspects of public purchasing in the internal market; also in French Marchés publics and in German Öffentliches Auftragswesen.


e-CERTIS database

The Commission is offering access to its e-CERTIS database which provides an on-line storehouse of the documents which are most frequently requested in the 27 Member States (for example, evidence of compliance with fiscal obligations or social security obligations or evidence of economic and financial standing). It allows users to identify such documents and match them with their local equivalent. The use of e-CERTIS helps business operators to reduce costs and uncertainty due to the lack of knowledge about the different certificates requested by the various national contracting authorities:

You can access the e-CERTIS webpage here. The User Guide is in English, but a brochure is available in 21 languages.


Consultation web page

The e-procurement consultation runs until 31 January 2011, and from the consultation web page you can access the Green Paper in 22 official EU languages. Here is a link to the English version:

Green Paper on expanding the use of e-Procurement in the EU; Brussels, 18.10.2010 COM(2010) 571 final (23 pages)

The consultation document is accompanied by the staff working document SEC(2010) 1214. On the consultation page it goes under the name of Evaluation Report and it can be accessed here (162 pages).

The COM and SEC documents have not yet been posted on Eur-Lex under Preparatory acts.


Target groups

Even if the consultation is open to all citizens and organisations, the Commission expects contributions particularly from member states, large procurement agencies and contracting authorities, the ICT industry, procurement specialists in the private and public sector and representatives of business trade associations.




Ralf Grahn

P.S. A Fistful of Euros describes itself as a webzine and a weblog, writing from a pan-European perspective. It is one of the best researched and most influential Euroblogs, widely read with a policy focus which engages many and affects everyone: the economy.

There are now 676 Euroblogs listed on the multilingual blog aggregator Bloggingportal.eu, where you find all the new posts on European affairs.

Monday, 25 January 2010

EU Creative content consultation contributions online

The contributions to the European Commission’s public consultation on creative content in a European digital single market are now online, divided into the following contributor categories: member states/public bodies, European associations/NGOs, companies and citizens.



The responses are based on the Commission’s reflection document on creative content (22 October 2009).




Ralf Grahn







P.S. Chasing Brussels is an audioblog, offering podcasts of discussions between eurobloggers on recent events and challenges facing the European Union.

Chasing Brussels is listed with more than 500 great Euroblogs on growing multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, your useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, policies, communication, economics, finance, business, civil society and law.

If you are interested in the EU or the euroblogosphere, you can also subscribe to the RSS feed for new blog posts appearing on Bloggingportal.eu.

By the way, I also discuss European issues in Finnish on Eurooppaoikeus and in Swedish on Grahnblawg.

Wednesday, 30 December 2009

EU: Last call for copyright comments! Consultation closing

There are only a few days left to respond to the public consultation “Content Online”, launched by the DG Internal Market of the European Commission. This consultation on audiovisual and media policy, copyright, and the Single market ends 5 January 2010.




The exercise is based on the document Creative Content in a European Digital Single Market: Challenges for the Future ─ A Reflection Document DG INFSO and DG MARKT (22 October 2009; 22 pages).


These questions are of crucial importance to citizens and consumers, as well creative artists and employees, organisations for various interests, public administrations and businesses of all sizes, as a quick look at the contents show:


TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Introduction

2. The evolution of technology and content markets
2.1. Music
2.2. Publishing
2.3. Audiovisual (Film, Video-on-Demand)
2.4. Video games

3. Recent EU level initiatives

4. The main challenges
4.1. Consumer access
4.2. Commercial users' access
4.3. Protection of rightholders

5. Possible EU actions for a Single Market for Creative Content Online
5.1. Consumer access
5.2. Commercial users’ access
5.3. Protection of rightholders

6. Conclusions



European Digital Agenda & Creative Content Online


As part of the coming European Digital Agenda, the objective of the reflection paper is the creation in Europe of a modern, pro-competitive, and consumer-friendly legal framework for a genuine Single Market for Creative Content Online, in particular by (page 3):

– creating a favourable environment in the digital world for creators and rightholders, by ensuring appropriate remuneration for their creative works, as well as for a culturally diverse European market;

– encouraging the provision of attractive legal offers to consumers with transparent pricing and terms of use, thereby facilitating users' access to a wide range of content through digital networks anywhere and at any time;

– promoting a level playing field for new business models and innovative solutions for the distribution of creative content.





The announced European Digital Agenda is in a formative phase, and the legislative programme for the next Commission is being prepared (page 3), which means that this is an important time for those who want to contribute to the agenda.



A European Copyright Law?


Among possible EU actions for a single market for creative content online (from page 14), and against the background of hopelessly fragmented markets, the Commission mentions the idea of a unified “European Copyright Law”, as a means to achieve coherence in online licensing (page 18). Here is an excerpt of the reasoning:


A Community copyright title would have instant Community-wide effect, thereby creating a single market for copyrights and related rights. It would overcome the issue that each national copyright law, though harmonised as to its substantive scope, applies only in one particular national territory. A Community copyright would enhance legal security and transparency, for right owners and users alike, and greatly reduce transaction and licensing costs. Unification of EU copyright by regulation could also restore the balance between rights and exceptions – a balance that is currently skewed by the fact that the harmonisation directives mandate basic economic rights, but merely permit certain exceptions and limitations. A regulation could provide that rights and exceptions are afforded the same degree of harmonisation.

By creating a single European copyright title, European Copyright Law would create a toolfor streamlining rights management across the Single Market, doing away with the necessity of administering a "bundle" of 27 national copyrights.



With rapidly evolving technologies and market conditions, copyright is going to be one of crucial issues in the internal market as well as for the European Union’s trade negotiations internationally.

It is important that all interested parties contribute to the improvement of the European legal and policy framework.

The copyright consultation closes on 5 January 2010.




Ralf Grahn



P.S. Read Adjudicating Europe and other great euroblogs listed on multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, our common “village well” for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs.

Saturday, 16 May 2009

EU: European Works Council

Social policy at European Union level is clearly centred on work. The objectives mentioned in Article 136 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) are: the promotion of employment, improved living and working conditions, so as to make possible their harmonisation while the improvement is being maintained, proper social protection, dialogue between management and labour, the development of human resources with a view to lasting high employment and the combating of exclusion.

The legal base for the European Community’s supporting and complementing action is Article 137 TEC, where one of the fields mentioned is the information and consultation of workers, to which the codecision procedure applies (Article 251 TEC).


***

Recast Works Council Directive

Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (Recast) has now been published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 16.5.2009 L 122/28.



The objective of the recast Directive, with EEA relevance, is:


Article 1
Objective

1. The purpose of this Directive is to improve the right to information and to consultation of employees in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings.

2. To that end, a European Works Council or a procedure for informing and consulting employees shall be established in every Community-scale undertaking and every Community-scale group of undertakings, where requested in the manner laid down in Article 5(1), with the purpose of informing and consulting employees. The arrangements for informing and consulting employees shall be defined and implemented in such a way as to ensure their effectiveness and to enable the undertaking or group of undertakings to take decisions effectively.

3. Information and consultation of employees must occur at the relevant level of management and representation, according to the subject under discussion. To achieve that, the competence of the European Works Council and the scope of the information and consultation procedure for employees governed by this Directive shall be limited to transnational issues.

4. Matters shall be considered to be transnational where they concern the Community-scale undertaking or Community-scale group of undertakings as a whole, or at least two undertakings or establishments of the undertaking or group situated in two different Member States.

5. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, where a Community-scale group of undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(1)(c) comprises one or more undertakings or groups of undertakings which are Community-scale undertakings or Community-scale groups of undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) or (c), a European Works Council shall be established at the level of the group unless the agreements referred to in Article 6 provide otherwise.

6. Unless a wider scope is provided for in the agreements referred to in Article 6, the powers and competence of European Works Councils and the scope of information and consultation procedures established to achieve the purpose specified in paragraph 1 shall, in the case of a Community-scale undertaking, cover all the establishments located within the Member States and, in the case of a Community-scale group of undertakings, all group undertakings located within the Member States.

7. Member States may provide that this Directive shall not apply to merchant navy crews.


***


Businesses concerned

A European Works Council or a procedure for informing and consulting employees must be established in the enterprises defined.


Community scale undertaking

‘Community-scale undertaking’ means any undertaking with at least 1 000 employees within the Member States and at least 150 employees in each of at least two Member States; Article 2(a).



Community scale group of undertakings

‘Community-scale group of undertakings’ means a group of undertakings with the following characteristics:

— at least 1 000 employees within the Member States,

— at least two group undertakings in different Member States, and

— at least one group undertaking with at least 150 employees in one Member State and at least one other group undertaking with at least 150 employees in another Member State; Article 2(c).



***

Transposition

Directive 2009/38 repeals Directive 94/45/EC, as amended, with effect from 6 June 2011, when the time to transpose the provisions of the new Directive into national law has ended.


Ralf Grahn

Wednesday, 8 April 2009

EU state aid: Public service broadcasting

Broadcasting offers a fascinating example of a sector where private companies compete with publicly funded entities.

The European Commission has been trying to find the right balance between competition and public funding in the broadcasting sector.

Today it issued a revised Draft Communication on the Application of State Aid Rules to Public Service Broadcasting, for a quick consultation of four weeks.



The reason for the new consultation round seems to lie in reactions from the EU member states, anxious to provide room for their public broadcasters, and the Commission indicates that it has taken some of these concerns on board.

An overview of the situation and links to relevant documents are provided in the press release State aid: Commission launches new consultation on revised rules for state funding of public service broadcasting (Brussels, 8th April 2009; IP/09/564), available in English, French and German.




***

Stakeholders have until 8 May 2009 to submit their comments.


Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 4 April 2009

EU media measures & consultation

The Commission’s Media Task Force has compiled an Inventory of measures affecting the media, covering the following policy areas:



1) Audiovisual and media policies
2) Communications policy
3) i2010
4) Research
5) Other policy files with potential media impact
6) Commissioner’s groups
7) Reference – Lisbon strategy, impact assessment

Policies affecting the media are spread over fifteen Directorates-General and Services, which makes the Inventory a valuable tool for everyone interested in EU level developments. The Inventory is updated until January 2009.


***

SME consultation

The European Commission’s (DG INFSO) Media Task Force has launched an online consultation "European publishing small and medium-sized enterprises in the digital era: technological and business innovation ", in order to carry out a thorough investigation of the current state of publishing SMEs, in particular the obstacles they face and future development possibilities.

This questionnaire is aimed at SMEs in the field of publishing: books, newspapers and magazines.





Ralf Grahn
:

Saturday, 31 January 2009

Coordinating EU development cooperation

Both the European Community (European Union) and the individual member states are active in global development cooperation, which raises the need for concerted and coordinated action.

The current Treaty establishing the European Community takes this into account, and the Lisbon Treaty would give the relevant provision added focus.

Further reading is suggested for those who want to dig deeper.



***

Current treaty

Article 180 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) provides for coordination and consultation between the European Community (European Union) and the member states on their development aid programmes.

International organisations and conferences, such as the United Nations and its organisations, are important forums, where the EU and the member states are expected to consult and to coordinate their actions.

Here is the wording of the current Article 180 TEC, published in the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJEU 29.12.2006 C 321 E/126:

Article 180 TEC

1. The Community and the Member States shall coordinate their policies on development cooperation and shall consult each other on their aid programmes, including in international organisations and during international conferences. They may undertake joint action. Member States shall contribute if necessary to the implementation of Community aid programmes.

2. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote the coordination referred to in
paragraph 1.


***

Original Lisbon Treaty

The intergovernmental conference (IGC 2007) amended the TEC ‘in the usual manner’ by inserting amendments, such as in Article 2, point 163 of the original Treaty of Lisbon, OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/94:


163) An Article 188 F shall be inserted, with the wording of Article 180; it shall be amended as follows:

At the beginning of paragraph 1, the following words shall be inserted: ‘In order to promote the complementarity and efficiency of their action,’.


***

Consolidated Lisbon Treaty

The consolidated Lisbon Treaty made Article 188f TFEU (ToL) readable once more. Renumbered Article 210 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), it looks like this (OJEU 9.5.2008 C 115/142):


Article 210 TFEU
(ex Article 180 TEC)

1. In order to promote the complementarity and efficiency of their action, the Union and the Member States shall coordinate their policies on development cooperation and shall consult each other on their aid programmes, including in international organisations and during international conferences. They may undertake joint action. Member States shall contribute if necessary to the implementation of Union aid programmes.

2. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote the coordination referred to in paragraph 1.


***

Lisbon Treaty changes

By the addition of the promotion of the complementarity and efficiency of action, the IGC 2007 gives the coordination and consultation more focus. Hardly a bad idea, given that the EU plus 27 potentially divergent member states are a lot to host for a single developing nation with scarce resources. On international forums, only a united European Union can hope to create effective development strategies with global reach.

Since the powers in development cooperation remain shared in a specific manner between the member states and the EU, according to Article 4(4) TFEU, the Commission is still invited to take any useful initiatives to promote coordination.

The end result is that Article 210 TFEU is the same as Article III-318(1) and (2) of the Constitutional Treaty.


***

EuropeAid Annual Report for 2007

EuropeAid (under Commissioner Benita Ferrero-Waldner) manages the Commission’s external aid programmes, and its Annual Report 2008 on the European Community’s development and external assistance policies and their implementation in 2007 (176 pages) was published in the autumn:

http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/multimedia/publications/documents/annual-reports/europeaid_annual_report_2008_en.pdf



Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 29 November 2008

European Union: Employment Committee

The treaty based advisory Employment Committee promotes coordination between EC (EU) member states on employment and labour market policies.

Does ‘management and labour’ have a specific meaning in this context? Often used in Eurojargon, but what are the social partners?

***


Current TEC

The headline of this post starts with ‘European Union’, which can be defended if you look at the EU as a Greek Temple, with three pillars. More exactly, the subject matter belongs to the Community pillar (first pillar), but few readers seem to be that exact in their web searches. The term ‘European Community’ seems to have fallen into disuse, save for official documents and a few brave lawyers. I try to use the EU and the EC terms in a pragmatic manner, depending on the context.

The current Article 130 (ex Article 109s) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) concludes the Title VIII Employment by establishing a sector committee.

The Employment Committee works in an advisory capacity.

Whereas most of the Employment Title speaks about employment (policies) or refers to the employment aims, Article 130 TEC picks up the term ‘labour markets’ mentioned in Article 125 TEC.

The Employment Committee promotes coordination between member states on employment and labour market policies.

The Employment Committee consults management and labour, known as the social partners in Eurospeak.

There is the customary proviso that the Employment Committee works ‘without prejudice to Article 207’, referring to the Committee of Permanent Representatives of the Member States (Coreper), the last stop before the Ministers meet in the Council.

The intergovernmental nature of the Employment Committee is illustrated not only by the wording that it is established to ‘promote coordination between Member States’ or by the fact that the Committee is appointed by the Council, but also by the preponderance of member states’ representatives. Each member state appoints two members (as does the Commission).
The existing Article 130 TEC (in the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJ 29.12.2006 C 321 E/103):


Article 130 TEC

The Council, after consulting the European Parliament, shall establish an Employment Committee with advisory status to promote coordination between Member States on employment and labour market policies. The tasks of the Committee shall be:

— to monitor the employment situation and employment policies in the Member States and the Community,

— without prejudice to Article 207, to formulate opinions at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative, and to contribute to the preparation of the Council proceedings referred to in Article 128.

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall consult management and labour.

Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint two members of the Committee.

***


Original Lisbon Treaty (ToL)


The Treaty of Lisbon (ToL) is still on its rocky road to possible entry into force. Agreed and signed between 27 member state governments, it has by now been approved by the national parliaments in 25 member states ahead of the original target date for entry into force (1 January 2009). Among the parliamentary ratifiers, only the holder of the next Council Presidency, the Czech Republic, looks certain to miss the agreed target date.

In addition, Ireland is pondering its European future following the negative outcome of the 12 June 2008 referendum. (For some updated references to the Irish debate, you can read yesterday’s post ‘Ireland and Lisbon Treaty’.)

Anyway, in some instances the Lisbon Treaty is the most up-to-date manifestation of what the member state governments want the treaties to say.

On the other hand, the treaty reform process, at least since the Treaty of Nice, has been focused on so called institutional innovations. With a few notable exceptions, most areas of Community policy have only been updated and adjusted technically to the different reform treaty versions: the draft Constitution, the Constitutional Treaty and the Lisbon Treaty.

The changes to the Title on employment in the Lisbon Treaty are minimal. Article 2, point 111 deleted a few words from Article 125 TEC and the following point (112) concerned the common commercial policy.

Consequently, Article 126 TEC and the following ones underwent only horizontal or technical amendments (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/79). In Article 130 TEC the word ‘Community’ is replaced by ‘Union’, as elsewhere in the Treaty of Lisbon. Another horizontal amendment is that the clarifying words ‘acting by a simple majority’ are inserted after ‘The Council’ according to Article 2, point 4 ToL, but the procedure remains the same.

***

Renumbering

The Table of equivalences of the original Treaty of Lisbon tells us that Title VIII Employment was to be renumbered Title IX and that Article 130 TEC and TFEU (ToL) was to be renumbered Article 150 TFEU in the consolidated version of the amending treaties (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/214).


***


Consolidated Lisbon Treaty



Article 150 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) takes over the contents of the existing Article 130 TEC with the minimal change in terminology and the renumbering noted above.

As a consequence, the consolidated TFEU, published in the Official Journal of the European Union, OJ 9.5.2008 C 115/113, looks like this:

TITLE IX
EMPLOYMENT

Article 150 TFEU
(ex Article 130 TEC)

The Council, acting by a simple majority after consulting the European Parliament, shall establish an Employment Committee with advisory status to promote coordination between Member States on employment and labour market policies. The tasks of the Committee shall be:

— to monitor the employment situation and employment policies in the Member States and the Union,

— without prejudice to Article 240, to formulate opinions at the request of either the Council or the Commission or on its own initiative, and to contribute to the preparation of the Council proceedings referred to in Article 148.

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall consult management and labour.

Each Member State and the Commission shall appoint two members of the Committee.

***

Management and labour

The English version of the treaties refers to consulting ‘management and labour’. We look at the wording of the sentence, first in English:

In fulfilling its mandate, the Committee shall consult management and labour.

Management and labour seem to be given more exact contours, when we turn to the German version:
Bei der Erfüllung seines Auftrags hört der Ausschuss die Sozialpartner.

The French words, likewise, gives management and labour a more precise meaning than the English treaty text:

Dans l'accomplissement de son mandat, le comité consulte les partenaires sociaux.

The Sapnish treaty text catches another nuance of the parties or partners to be consulted:

Para llevar a cabo su mandato, el Comité deberá consultar a los interlocutores sociales.

The Finnish treaty text uses (almost) the same terminology as the German and the French, although the customary term evokes contracting parties (collective agreements) as much as partners in a dialogue:

Tehtäväänsä toteuttaessaan komitea kuulee työmarkkinaosapuolia.

The Swedish text uses the term ’arbetsmarknadens parter’ identical with the Finnish concept:

Kommittén ska när den utför sitt uppdrag höra arbetsmarknadens parter.

We can conclude that the drafters of the treaties have had organised employers and organised labour in mind and that national systems of collective bargaining and traditions of dialogue between management and employee interests are reflected in the various terms used. Anyway, the English version seems to be less exact than the other language versions. (The Title Social policy is imbued with references to the social partners.)

The subparagraph does not specify the level of consultations, which means that the wording does not exclude consultations at European or national level.

***

Social partners

The Europa Glossary outlines the meaning of ‘social partners’ in the following way (although it leans heavily on Article 138 TEC, in the current Title XI Social policy, education, vocational training and youth):

Social partners
The glossary is being updated given the recent signing of the Treaty of Lisbon.
The Commission is required to consult various social partners when it wishes to submit proposals in this field (article 138 of the EC Treaty). This social dialogue occurs via the three main cross-industry organisations representing the social partners at European level:
the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC);
the Union of Industrial and Employers' Confederations of Europe (BUSINESSEUROPE);
the European Centre of Enterprises with Public Participation (CEEP).

In addition to these three European cross-industry organisations, there are many other socio-professional groups representing specific or sectoral interests.
It is the Commission's task to promote consultation of the social partners and take any relevant measures to facilitate their dialogue by ensuring balanced support for the parties.
Before submitting proposals in the field of social policy, the Commission consults the social partners on the possible direction of EU action.
The social partners also play an important role in the European Economic and Social Committee, where they sit alongside other representatives of civil society.

***

Employment Committee – Council decision

Not to forget secondary legislation, the Committee was established by the Council decision of 24 January 2000 establishing the Employment Committee (OJ 4.2.2000 L 29/21).

The decision reiterates the treaty provisions, but adds some specifications to the Committee’s tasks.

***

Employment Committee activity

The European Commission, Employment and Social Affairs, offers an introductory web page on the Employment Committee with links to its activities:

http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/employment_strategy/emco_en.htm





Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 1 November 2008

Sweden: EU Services Directive

The Swedish Government has published a hefty memorandum (consultation paper) on the EU Services Directive, officially Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market, OJ 27.12.2006 L 376/36.
The 630 page publication called Genomförande av tjänstedirektivet, Ds 2008:75, contains both reasons and the planned legislation, and it is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/11/41/16/1e89331c.pdf

There is an English summary from page 26 to page 41.

A large number of authorities and organisations are consulted, and they have until 15 January 2009 to present their views. The Government’s transposition bill is planned for May 2009, and the amended legislation is intended to enter into force 28 December 2009.

***

Preparatory legislative documents in Sweden (memorandums and government bills) are traditionally thorough and, especially before the publication of new legal books on a subject, they are invaluable resources for researchers, students and practitioners.


Ralf Grahn

Friday, 24 October 2008

Euro banknotes and coins VII: More comments on Article 128 TFEU

The previous post mentioned a few brief UK references to Article 128 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). We now turn to legal materials: from Sweden outside the Eurozone, and from inside Euroland Finland, as well as some EU commentaries in book form, to see if the issue of euro banknotes and euro coins has elicited enlightening comments.

***


Lissabonfördraget (Sweden)

Sweden remains outside the Eurozone, despite the lack of an opt-out based on the treaties.

The consultation paper ’Lissabonfördraget’ was the first official Swedish description of the Lisbon Treaty amendments, and it is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/09/49/81/107aa077.pdf

It was followed by the Swedish government’s draft ratification bill ‘Lagrådsremiss – Lissabonfördraget’, published 29 May 2008:

http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/5676/a/106277

The draft bill was given a green light by the Council on Legislation (Lagrådet):

http://www.lagradet.se/yttranden/Lissabonfordraget.pdf

The latest official government view, and now my standard reference for Sweden, is the ratification bill, with the Swedish parliament (Riksdagen) expected to decide on approval in late autumn, on 20 November. The ratification bill, Regeringens proposition 2007/08:168 Lissabonfördraget; 3 July 2008, is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/10/84/02/8c96cf3e.pdf



The Swedish government gives a general presentation of the objectives and the tasks of the European Central Bank, including the sole power to authorise the issue of euro banknotes, on page 131:

”Europeiska centralbanken

I artiklarna 112 och 113 i nu gällande EG-fördrag finns institutionella bestämmelser om Europeiska centralbanken (ECB). ECB utgör tillsammans med de nationella centralbankerna det Europeiska centralbankssystemet (ECBS) (artikel 107.1 i EG-fördraget). ECBS:s huvudmål är att upprätthålla prisstabilitet (artikel 105.1 i EG-fördraget). Utan att åsidosätta detta mål ska ECBS stödja den allmänna ekonomiska politiken inom gemenskapen i syfte att bidra till att förverkliga gemenskapens mål.

ECBS leds av ECB:s beslutande organ, dvs. dess råd och direktionen (artikel 107.3 i EG-fördraget). ECB:s direktion består av ordförande, vice ordförande och fyra andra ledamöter (artikel 112.2 i EG-fördraget).

ECB utformar självständigt unionens monetära politik och har ensamrätt på att tillåta sedelutgivning inom gemenskapen (artiklarna 105 och 106 i EG-fördraget). Den ska årligen till Europaparlamentet, rådet, kommissionen och Europeiska rådet överlämna en årsrapport om verksamheten inom ECBS och om den monetära politiken under det föregående och innevarande året (artikel 113.3).

ECB ska inom sitt behörighetsområde höras om varje utkast till unionsrättsakt samt om varje utkast till rättsregler på nationell nivå (artikel 105.4).

Närmare bestämmelser om ECBS och ECB finns i ett protokoll om stadgan för Europeiska centralbankssystemet och Europeiska centralbanken.”


The changing decision-making procedures are discussed on page 184. The Treaty of Lisbon abolishes the so called cooperation procedure. Pursuant to the Lisbon Treaty, the Council adopts measures to harmonise the denominations and technical specifications of euro coins, after consulting the European Parliament and the European Central Bank:

”Proceduren för samarbetsförfarandet finns i artikel 252 i EG-fördraget. Amsterdamfördraget minskade avsevärt tillämpningsområdet för samarbetsförfarandet, vilket för närvarande endast tillämpas på den ekonomiska och monetära politiken (artiklarna 99.5, 102.2, 103.2 och 106.2 i EG-fördraget). Genom Lissabonfördraget upphävs det s.k. samarbetsförfarandet i nuvarande artikel 252 i EG-fördraget (jfr avsnitt 16.2 om förfaranden för antagande av akter och andra bestämmelser). Beslutsförfarandena i de artiklar där samarbetsförfarandet idag tillämpas ändras därför enligt följande.

-----

Rådet kan enligt artikel 106.2 i EG-fördraget vidta åtgärder för att harmonisera valörerna och de tekniska specifikationerna för alla mynt som ska sättas i omlopp. Genom Lissabonfördraget anges att sådana åtgärder ska antas av rådet efter att ha hört Europaparlamentet och Europeiska centralbanken (artikel 106.2 i EUF-fördraget).”

***

Lissabonin sopimus (Finland)

Finland is one of 15 member states currently forming Euroland, or more officially the Eurosystem, the term used by the European Central Bank.

The Finnish ratification bill, ‘Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen ja Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen muuttamisesta tehdyn Lissabonin sopimuksen hyväksymisestä ja laiksi sen lainsäädännön alaan kuuluvien määräysten voimaansaattamisesta’ (HE 23/2008 vp), presents an overview of economic and monetary policy (Talous- ja rahapolitiikka) on pages 91 to 92.
Article 106 TFEU (ToL), renumbered Article 128 TFEU, is described on page 211. Inserting the word ‘euro’ before banknotes is noted. Consultation of the European Parliament is mentioned, and the provision is said to correspond with Article III-186 of the Constitutional Treaty:

”106 artikla (uusi 128 artikla) sisältää määräykset setelien ja metallirahojen liikkeelle laskemisesta. Artiklan 1 kohtaa täsmennetään siten, että Euroopan keskuspankilla on yksinoikeus nimenomaan eurosetelien liikkeelle laskemiseen yhteisössä. Artiklan 2 kohtaan tehdään lisäys, jonka mukaan neuvoston tulee kuulla myös Euroopan parlamenttia ennen kuin se päättää metallirahojen yksikköarvojen ja teknisten määritelmien yhdenmukaistamisesta. Määräys vastaa perustuslakisopimuksen III-186 artiklaa.”

http://www.finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf


The Swedish language version of the ratification bill ‘Regeringens proposition till Riksdagen med förslag om godkännande av Lissabonfördraget om ändring av fördraget om Europeiska unionen och fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen och till lag om sättande i kraft av de bestämmelser i fördraget som hör till området för lagstiftningen’ (RP 23/2008 rd), offers the same general remarks on economic and monetary policy on pages 93 to 94. The detailed remarks, Article by Article, under ’Ekonomisk och monetär politik’ contain the same description of Article 106 TFEU (ToL), the future Article 128 TFEU as in Finnish, on page 214:

”Artikel 106 (blivande artikel 128) innehåller bestämmelser om utgivning av eurosedlar och euromynt. Punkt 1 i artikeln precisera så att Europeiska centralbanken har ensamrätt att ge ut just eurosedlar i gemenskapen. Till artikel 106.2 fogas ett tillägg, enligt vilket rådet även ska höra Europaparlamentet innan det beslutar om harmonisering av valörerna och de tekniska specifikationerna för mynt. Bestämmelsen motsvarar artikel III-186 i det konstitutionella fördraget.”

The ratification bill in Swedish can be accessed at:

http://www.finlex.fi/sv/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf

***


de Poncins

Étienne de Poncins offers a few general comments on EU economic governance and budget matters, ‘La gouvernance économique et les questions budgétaires’ in his ‘Le traité de Lisbonne en 27 clés’ (Éditions Lignes de Repères, 2008), pages 245─251, but nothing specific on Article 128 TFEU.

***

Fischer

‚Der Vertrag von Lissabon‘, by Klemens H. Fischer (Nomos, Stämpfli Verlag & Verlag Österreich, 2008), traces the amendments Article by Article; here on page 271. He refers to the amendments according to Article 2, point 92, of the original Treaty of Lisbon, but he mistakenly remarks:
„Das Anhörungsverfahren de lege lata wird (cf. Absatz 2) durch das Zustimmungsverfahren ersetzt.“
The other amendments are editorial (horizontal).

***

Priollaud and Siritzky

François-Xavier Priollaud and David Siritzky offer a short introductory explanation on economic and monetary policy (pages 246 and 247). They succinctly present the main features of the chapet on monetary policy (La politique monétaire) on pages 254 an 255 in their book ‘Le traité de Lisbonne – Commentaire, article par article, des nouveaux traités européens (TUE et TFUE)’ (La Documentation française, Paris, 2008). They offer the following description of the powers of the European Parliament, but they do not find it necessary to mention the move to the consultation procedure concerning Article 128(2) TFUE (although the amendments are indicated correctly in the text of the Article):
« La modification des pouvoirs du Parlement européen

La généralisation de la procédure legislative renforce le rôle du Parlement européen en ce qui concerne la modification de certaines dispositions des statuts du SEBC et de la BCE (art. 129 TFUE) et pour l’adoption des mesures nécessaires à l’usage de l’euro (art. 133 TFUE). Les pouvoirs du Parlement sont en revanche diminués par rapport à la situation actuelle en matière de contrôle prudentiel des établisseents et marchés financiers (art. 127 § 6 TFUE). Il ne sera que consulté (comme la BCE), alors que son avis conforme était jusq’à présent requis par l’art. 105 TCE. L’unanimité est en outre maintenue sur ce point. »

***

Consultation procedure

Measures to harmonise the denominations and technical specifications of euro coins is a detail, but the intergovernmental character of economic policy and the foundations of monetary policy is striking.
In Article 128 TFEU, the European Parliament is downgraded, consulted (as the ECB).

In case someone wants to reflect on the consultation procedure (and other decision-making procedures), Martin Gellermann offers a description in Rudolf Streinz (Hrsgb.): EUV/EGV Vertrag über die Europäische Union und Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (C.H.Beck, 2003). I quote the beginning of Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren (page 2204):

„Als Ursprungsmodell für eine Beteiligung des Europäischen Parlaments am Prozess der gemeinschaftlichen Rechtsetzung erscheint das Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren in dem der Kommission das Initiativrecht, dem Parlament eine Beratungsbefugnis und dem Rat das alleinige Entscheidungsrecht gebührt.“


Ralf Grahn

Euro banknotes and coins VI: Article 128 TFEU comments

We look at UK comments on Article 128 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) concerning the issue of euro banknotes and euro coins.

***

European Central Bank

The Opinion of the European Central Bank of 5 July 2007 at the request of the Council of the European Union on the opening of an Intergovernmental Conference to draw up a Treaty amending the existing Treaties (CON/2007/20), OJ 13.7.2007 C 160/2, was issued on the understanding that, as regards the status, mandate, tasks and legal regime of the ECB, the Eurosystem and the European System of Central Banks, the changes to the current Treaties to be introduced by the IGC were to be limited to and were to comprise all the innovations agreed at the 2004 IGC.


***

Statewatch

Professor Steve Peers covered the Treaty of Lisbon in a number of Statewatch Analyses. ‘EU Reform Treaty Analysis no. 3.4: Revised text of Part Three, Titles VII to XVII of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC): Other internal EC policies’ (Version 2, 24 October 2007) includes the current Title VII Economic and monetary policy.

Peers presented the text of Article 106 TFEU (ToL), to be renumbered Article 128 TFEU in the consolidated version, and highlighted the changes. He offered the following succinct comment (page 12):

“The consultation procedure shall apply to this Article, in place of the ‘cooperation’ procedure. These measures shall not constitute legislative acts. This entails a downgrade of the EP’s role here.”

The analysis 3.4 and other useful Statewatch analyses are available through:

http://www.statewatch.org/euconstitution.htm


***

FCO

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) offers a convenient source of brief annotations on Lisbon Treaty amendments in ‘A comparative table of the current EC and EU treaties as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon’ (Command Paper 7311, published 21 January 2008). It offers the following comment on Article 128 TFEU, Article 106 TFEU (ToL) in the original Lisbon Treaty (page 12):

“Draws on Article 106 TEC. Paragraph 2 replaces the cooperation procedure with consultation with the EP.”

The FCO comparative table is available at:

http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm73/7311/7311.asp

***

House of Commons Library

The UK House of Commons Library Research Paper 07/86 ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: amendments to the Treaty establishing the European Community’ (published 6 December 2007) discussed ‘H. Economic and Monetary Policy’ on pages 61 to 64. Article 106 TFEU (ToL) is included in a brief description on page 62:

“Articles 105 ─ 110 (Constitution Articles III-185 ─ 190) on monetary policy are largely the same as the present Treaty Articles.”

The Library Research Paper 07/86 is available at:

http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2007/rp07-086.pdf

***

House of Lords

At this juncture, economic and monetary union (EMU) did not interest the House of Lords, so I found nothing on Article 106 TFEU (ToL) or 128 TFEU in the House of Lords European Union Committee report ‘The Treaty of Lisbon: an impact assessment, Volume I: Report’ (HL Paper 62-I, published 13 March 2008).

The report is available at:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldselect/ldeucom/62/62.pdf


***

The following post is going to look at legislative materials and comments on Article 128 TFEU from other corners of Europe.


Ralf Grahn

Thursday, 23 October 2008

Euro banknotes and coins IIIa: Article III-186 Constitution

Did the intergovernmental conference (IGC 2004) improve on or ─ as more often ─ subtract from the proposal by the European Convention regarding the issue of euro banknotes and coins?

First, a reminder of the contents.

***

In the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, the provisions on monetary policy are located in Part III ‘The policies and functioning of the Union’, Title III ‘Internal policies and action’, Chapter II ‘Economic and monetary policy’, Section 2 ‘Monetary policy’.

Article III-186 sets out a more centralised system for euro banknotes and a more decentralised arrangement for the issue of euro coins, OJ 16.12.2004 C 310/82:

Article III-186 Constitution

1. The European Central Bank shall have the exclusive right to authorise the issue of euro bank notes in the Union. The European Central Bank and the national central banks may issue such notes. Only the bank notes issued by the European Central Bank and the national central banks shall have the status of legal tender within the Union.

2. Member States may issue euro coins subject to approval by the European Central Bank of the volume of the issue.

The Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may adopt European regulations laying down measures to harmonise the denominations and technical specifications of coins intended for circulation to the extent necessary to permit their smooth circulation within the Union. The Council shall act after consulting the European Parliament and the European Central Bank.


***

The next post is going to compare the Constitutional Treaty III-186 with the draft Constitution Article III-78 and look at some legislative materials on the Constitution.


Ralf Grahn

Wednesday, 22 October 2008

Euro banknotes and coins IIb: Comparison Article III-78 draft Constitution

We compare the proposal of the European Convention (Article III-78) with the current Article 106 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC) concerning the issue of euro banknotes and euro coins.

After that we look at some legal materials and descriptions of the proposal of the European Convention in the draft Constitution.

***

Texts compared

Article III-78(1) of the draft Constitution wrote the European Central Bank in full, and it added the word ‘euro’ before banknotes. The third sentence was slightly rephrased, and ‘Union’ replaced ‘Community’. Similar editorial changes were made to the second paragraph, but the European Parliament was downgraded by the move from the cooperation procedure to the consultation procedure.

***

de Poncins

Étienne de Poncins presented the proposed text of Article III-78 of the draft Constitution in ‘Vers une Constitution européenne’ (Éditions 10/18, 2003), without comment, on page 302─303.

***

Sweden

Sweden remains outside the third phase of economic and monetary union (EMU), without a derogation, but following the 14 September 2003 referendum.

I found no mention of Article III-78 in the Swedish government’s memorandum on the draft Constitution, ‘Europeiska konventet om EU:s framtid’ (Utrikesdepartementet, Departementsserien (Ds) 2003:58, 2003).

***

Sweden

Ahead of the intergovernmental conference (IGC 2003─2004), but after the euro referendum, the government of Sweden made a passing reference to technical specifications regarding euro coins, which are decided by the Eurogroup, in ‘Europeiska konventet om EU:s framtid’ (Regeringens skrivelse 2003/04:13, den 2 oktober 2003), on page 48:

”Redan idag finns ett antal frågor där euroländerna själva fattar beslut, bl.a. sanktioner i stabilitets- och tillväxtpakten, växelkurspolitik och tekniska frågor som rör euromynten. Konventet föreslår att euroländerna, inom det ordinarie rådet, skall kunna samordna sin politik ytterligare genom att de ges möjlighet att själva besluta om särskilda bestämmelser för euroländerna när det gäller riktlinjer för den ekonomiska politiken samt förfarandet vid alltför stort underskott.”

***

United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has opted out of the third stage of economic and monetary union (EMU). (In the latest consolidated version of the treaties, Protocol (No 25) on certain provisions relating to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, OJ 29.12.2006 C 321 E/299).
Between the European Convention and the intergovernmental conference, the UK government presented its general approach ─ most British ─ in ‘A Constitutional Treaty for the EU; The British Approach to the European Union Intergovernmental Conference 2003’ (Cm5934, September 2003), under Economic Governance on pages 34─35:

“74. Many of the issues discussed in the European Convention and raised in the draft Constitutional Treaty could have significant consequences for the future performance of EU economies. The draft Constitutional Treaty proposed by the Convention has proposed changes to the EU’s existing system of economic governance and other aspects of the EU fiscal framework; the institutional balance between the Union and Member States in economic policy coordination; and the role of the Eurogroup, the informal grouping of euro area finance ministers. The Government will oppose any such proposals which might lead to unnecessary rigidities or undermine the central role of Member States in determining their economic policies. It will work to ensure outcomes that will bolster stability, promote flexibility and enhance the ability of European countries to raise productivity and employment levels.

75. The draft Treaty does not alter the terms of the UK’s Economic and Monetary Union protocol (allowing the UK to decide whether or not to join the euro). This will need formally to be re-adopted on the conclusion of the IGC.”

***

Finland

Finland is part of Euroland.

The Finnish government, in ‘Valtioneuvoston selonteko Eduskunnalle konventin tuloksista ja valmistautumisesta hallitusten väliseen konferenssiin’ (VNS 2/2003 vp), listed the procedure in Article III-78 among the non-legislative acts to be adopted by the Council after consulting the European Parliament (Muut kuin lainsäätämisjärjestyksessä hyväksyttävät säädökset; 3.21Määrenemmistö neuvostossa ja Euroopan parlamentin kuuleminen; page 88).

***

We will see that the European Convention initiated some of the changes of terminology, later to appear in the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon.

Downgrading the role of the European Parliament to mere consultation concerning the detail of denominations and technical specifications of euro coins did not elicit much comment, but it underlined the intergovernmental character of EU economic and monetary union (EMU) in combination with the particular autonomy of the European Central Bank with regard to monetary policy.


Ralf Grahn

Thursday, 16 October 2008

EU: Monetary policy VII Lisbon Treaty comments

The previous post mentioned a few brief UK references to Article 127 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). We now turn to legal materials: outside the Eurozone from Sweden, inside Euroland Finland, as well as some EU commentaries in book form, to see if the objectives and the basic tasks of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and the European Central Bank (ECB), or potential European level financial supervision have elicited comments.

***


Lissabonfördraget (Sweden)

The consultation paper ’Lissabonfördraget’ was the first official Swedish description of the Lisbon Treaty amendments, and it is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/09/49/81/107aa077.pdf

It was followed by the Swedish government’s draft ratification bill ‘Lagrådsremiss – Lissabonfördraget’, published 29 May 2008:

http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/5676/a/106277

The draft bill was given a green light by the Council on Legislation (Lagrådet):

http://www.lagradet.se/yttranden/Lissabonfordraget.pdf

The latest official government view, and now my standard reference for Sweden, is the ratification bill, with the Swedish parliament (Riksdagen) expected to decide on approval in late autumn, in November or even later in the year. Committee work has not even started. According to Europaportalen the latest estimate for a decision by the parliament (Riksdagen) is before Christmas. The ratification bill, Regeringens proposition 2007/08:168 Lissabonfördraget; 3 July 2008, is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/10/84/02/8c96cf3e.pdf

Economic and monetary policy (23.2 Ekonomisk och monetär politik) is mainly discussed on pages 180 to 185. The Swedish government briefly presents the objectives and the tasks of the European Central Bank on various pages of the bill according to Article 105 TFEU (ToL). The potential transfer of tasks pertaining to financial supervision is mentioned on page 185, in the context of amended decision-making procedures, where a certain weakening of the European Parliament’s position is acknowledged:

”Inom ramen för den monetära politiken får rådet i dag genom enhälligt beslut på förslag från kommissionen efter att ha hört Europeiska centralbanken och med Europaparlamentets samtycke tilldela Europeiska centralbanken särskilda uppgifter i samband med tillsynen över kreditinstitut och andra finansinstitut med undantag av försäkringsföretag. Genom Lissabonfördraget får Europeiska centralbanken genom förordningar som ska antas av rådet tilldelas dessa särskilda uppgifter. Rådet ska besluta med enhällighet efter att ha hört Europaparlamentet och Europeiska centralbanken (artikel 105.6 i EUF-fördraget). En viss försvagning sker här av Europaparlamentets inflytande i och med att dess samtycke ersätts med dess hörande.”

Sweden remains outside the Eurozone, despite the lack of an opt-out based on the treaties.

***

Lissabonin sopimus (Finland)

Finland is one of 15 member states currently forming Euroland, or the Eurosystem, as the European Central Bank calls it.

The Finnish ratification bill, ‘Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen ja Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen muuttamisesta tehdyn Lissabonin sopimuksen hyväksymisestä ja laiksi sen lainsäädännön alaan kuuluvien määräysten voimaansaattamisesta’ (HE 23/2008 vp), presents an overview of economic and monetary policy (Talous- ja rahapolitiikka) on pages 91 to 92.
An explanation of the chapter on monetary policy (Rahapolitiikka) and a description of Article 105 TFEU (ToL), renumbered Article 126 TFEU, follow on pages 210 to 211:

”Määräykset koskevat Euroopan keskuspankkijärjestelmän ja Euroopan keskuspankin perustehtäviä, niiden perussääntöä ja perussäännön tiettyjen osien muuttamista koskevia menettelyjä, Euroopan keskuspankin ja kansallisten keskuspankkien riippumattomuutta sekä Euroopan keskuspankin tehtäviensä suorittamiseksi tekemiä päätöksiä. Määräykset vastaavat EY-sopimuksen VII osaston 2 luvun määräyksiä, lukuun ottamatta tiettyjä päätöksentekomenettelyjä koskevia määräyksiä, uudeksi 245 a artiklaksi siirrettyjä määräyksiä Euroopan keskuspankkijärjestelmän kokoonpanosta ja Euroopan keskuspankin oikeushenkilöllisyydestä ja uudeksi 188 o artiklaksi siirrettyjä päätöksiä euroalueen ulkoisesta edustautumisesta. Lisäksi luvun loppuun on siirretty nykyisestä 4 luvusta tiettyjä määräyksiä toimenpiteistä, jotka ovat tarpeen otettaessa euro käyttöön yhteisenä rahana. Perustuslakisopimuksessa vastaavat määräykset on sisällytetty II luvun 2 jaksoon III-185–III-190 artiklaan.

105 artiklassa (uusi 127 artikla) määritellään Euroopan keskuspankkijärjestelmän tavoitteet ja tehtävät. Artiklan 6 kohtaa täsmennetään siten, että säädöstyypiksi, joka neuvostolla on käytössään sen päättäessä rahoituslaitosten valvontaa koskevien erityistehtävien antamisesta Euroopan keskuspankille, yksilöidään asetus. Lisäksi määräystä muutetaan siten, että Euroopan parlamentin puoltavan lausunnon sijasta riittää, että parlamenttia kuullaan ennen päätöksentekoa. Määräys vastaa perustuslakisopimuksen III-185 artiklaa.”

The Finnish ratification bill is available at:

http://www.finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf


The Swedish language version of the ratification bill ‘Regeringens proposition till Riksdagen med förslag om godkännande av Lissabonfördraget om ändring av fördraget om Europeiska unionen och fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen och till lag om sättande i kraft av de bestämmelser i fördraget som hör till området för lagstiftningen’ (RP 23/2008 rd), offers the same general remarks on economic and monetary policy on pages 93 to 94. The detailed remarks, Article by Article, under ’Ekonomisk och monetär politik’ contain the same description of the chapter on monetary policy (Monetär politik) and of Article 105 TFEU (ToL), the future Article 127 TFEU as in Finnish, on page 213:

”Bestämmelserna gäller de primära uppgifterna för Europeiska centralbankssystemet och Europeiska centralbanken, förfaranden för ändring av deras stadga och vissa delar i stadgan, Europeiska centralbankens och de nationella centralbankernas oavhängighet samt beslut som Europeiska centralbanken fattar för att utföra sina uppgifter. Bestämmelserna motsvarar bestämmelserna i avdelning VII kapitel 2 i EG-fördraget, med undantag för vissa bestämmelser om beslutsförfaranden, bestämmelser om Europeiska centralbankssystemets sammansättning och Europeiska centralbankens status som juridisk person som överförts till ny artikel 245a och beslut om euroområdets yttre representation som överförts som ny artikel 188o. Till slutet av kapitlet har dessutom från nuvarande kapitel 4 överförts vissa bestämmelser om nödvändiga åtgärder när euron tas i bruk som gemensam valuta. Motsvarande bestämmelser ingår i kapitel II avsnitt 2 i artikel III-185–III-190 i det konstitutionella fördraget.

I artikel 105 (blivande artikel 127), definieras målen och uppgifterna för Europeiska centralbankssystemet. Artikel 105.6 preciseras så att den rättsaktstyp som rådet kan använda vid beslut om att tilldela Europeiska centralbanken särskilda uppgifter i samband med tillsynen över kreditinstitut och andra finansinstitut individualiseras som förordning. Bestämmelsen ändras dessutom så att i stället för ett samtycke från Europaparlamentet räcker det med att parlamentet hörs före beslutsfattandet. Bestämmelsen motsvarar artikel III-185 i det konstitutionella fördraget.”


The ratification bill in Swedish can be accessed at:

http://www.finlex.fi/sv/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf

***


de Poncins

Étienne de Poncins offers a few general comments on EU economic governance and budget matters, ‘La gouvernance économique et les questions budgétaires’ in his ‘Le traité de Lisbonne en 27 clés’ (Éditions Lignes de Repères, 2008), pages 245─251, but nothing specific on Article 127 TFEU.


Fischer

‚Der Vertrag von Lissabon‘, by Klemens H. Fischer (Nomos, Stämpfli & Verlag Österreich, 2008), traces the amendments Article by Article; here on pages 269─270. He remarks that the amendments in paragraphs 1 to 5 are editorial (horizontal), but with regard to paragraph 6 he states:

„Absatz 6 erhält eine neue Fassung, durch die das Anhöringsverfahren an die Stelle des Zustimmungsverfahrens tritt.“


Priollaud and Siritzky

François-Xavier Priollaud and David Siritzky offer a short introductory explanation on economic and monetary policy (pages 246 and 247). They succinctly present the main features of the chapet on monetary policy (La politique monétaire) on pages 254 an 255 of their book ‘Le traité de Lisbonne – Commentaire, article par article, des nouveaux traités européens (TUE et TFUE)’ (La Documentation française, Paris, 2008). They offer the following description of the powers of the European Parliament:

« La modification des pouvoirs du Parlement européen

La généralisation de la procédure legislative renforce le rôle du Parlement européen en ce qui concerne la modification de certaines dispositions des statuts du SEBC et de la BCE (art. 129 TFUE) et pour l’adoption des mesures nécessaires à l’usage de l’euro (art. 133 TFUE). Les pouvoirs du Parlement sont en revanche diminués par rapport à la situation actuelle en matière de contrôle prudentiel des établisseents et marchés financiers (art. 127 § 6 TFUE). Il ne sera que consulté (comme la BCE), alors que son avis conforme était jusq’à présent requis par l’art. 105 TCE. L’unanimité est en outre maintenue sur ce point. »

***

Consultation procedure

The intergovernmental character of prudential banking supervision is striking. In Article 127 TFEU, the European Parliament is marginalized, consulted (as the ECB) in the unlikely case that all 27 member states would be shaken enough by the financial turmoil to be likely to agree on a unanimous decision (regulation) to confer supervisory powers on the ECB.

Just in case someone wants to reflect on the consultation procedure (and other decision-making procedures), Martin Gellermann offers a description in Rudolf Streinz (Hrsgb.): EUV/EGV Vertrag über die Europäische Union und Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (C.H.Beck, 2003). I quote the beginning of Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren (page 2204):

„Als Ursprungsmodell für eine Beteiligung des Europäischen Parlaments am Prozess der gemeinschaftlichen Rechtsetzung erscheint das Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren in dem der Kommission das Initiativrecht, dem Parlament eine Beratungsbefugnis und dem Rat das alleinige Entscheidungsrecht gebührt.“

In this instance, we seem to be heading towards the beginnings of the Assembly.

***

The next post is going to present a few pointers on financial regulation and prudential supervision in the context of economic and monetary union (EMU).

Ralf Grahn

Sunday, 5 October 2008

EU: No-bailout rule VI

The previous post mentioned a few UK references to Article 125 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). We now turn to legislative materials from Sweden and Finland as well as some commentaries in book form, to see if the basically unchanged ‘no-bailout’ clause has elicited comments. If not, students of the matter would be advised to turn to materials on the Treaty of Maastricht and to specialist literature.


***


Lissabonfördraget

The consultation paper ’Lissabonfördraget’ was the first official Swedish description of the Lisbon Treaty amendments, and it is available at:

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/09/49/81/107aa077.pdf

It was followed by the Swedish government’s draft ratification bill ‘Lagrådsremiss – Lissabonfördraget’, published 29 May 2008:

http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/5676/a/106277

The draft bill was given a green light by the Council on Legislation (Lagrådet):

http://www.lagradet.se/yttranden/Lissabonfordraget.pdf

The latest official government view, and now my standard reference for Sweden, is the ratification bill, with the Swedish parliament (Riksdagen) expected to decide on approval in late autumn, probably November (Regeringens proposition 2007/08:168 Lissabonfördraget; 3 July 2008):

http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c6/10/84/02/8c96cf3e.pdf

Economic and monetary policy (23.2 Ekonomisk och monetary politik) is discussed on pages 180 to 185. The Swedish government explains procedural questions, including Article 102 TFEU (ToL). The rare cooperation procedure is abolished and replaced partly by the ordinary legislative procedure (multilateral surveillance) and partly by consulting the European Parliament (prohibitions on overdraft facilities and privileged access, and the ‘no bail-out’ clause) (on page 184):

Ӏndring av beslutsprocedurerna

Proceduren för samarbetsförfarandet finns i artikel 252 i EG-fördraget. Amsterdamfördraget minskade avsevärt tillämpningsområdet för samarbetsförfarandet, vilket för närvarande endast tillämpas på den ekonomiska och monetära politiken (artiklarna 99.5, 102.2, 103.2 och 106.2 i EG-fördraget). Genom Lissabonfördraget upphävs det s.k. samarbetsförfarandet i nuvarande artikel 252 i EG-fördraget (jfr avsnitt 16.2 om förfaranden för antagande av akter och andra bestämmelser). Beslutsförfarandena i de artiklar där samarbetsförfarandet idag tillämpas ändras därför enligt följande.

För att säkerställa en fastare samordning av den ekonomiska politiken ska rådet i dag på grundval av rapporter från kommissionen övervaka den ekonomiska utvecklingen i varje medlemsstat och inom unionen samt den ekonomiska politikens överensstämmelse med de allmänna riktlinjerna och regelbundet göra en samlad bedömning. För denna multilaterala övervakning ska medlemsstaterna lämna erforderliga uppgifter till kommissionen. Genom Lissabonfördraget anges att närmare föreskrifter om det multilaterala övervakningsförfarandet ska antas genom förordningar med tillämpning av det ordinarie lagstiftningsförfarandet (artikel 99.6 i EUF-fördraget). Ändringen innebär således en förstärkt ställning för Europaparlamentet.

I artiklarna 101–103 i EG-fördraget finns bestämmelser om förbud för Europeiska centralbanken (ECB) och nationella centralbanker att ge de gemensamma institutionerna eller de nationella offentliga organen, inklusive statsägda företag, rätt att övertrassera sina konton eller ge dem andra former av krediter. ECB eller centralbankerna får inte heller direkt från dem förvärva skuldförbindelser. En positiv särbehandling av gemenskapsorgan eller nationella offentliga institutioner eller företag är likaså förbjuden. Vidare ska gemenskapen inte ansvara för eller åta sig förpliktelser som har ingåtts av nationella offentliga institutioner eller företag. Genom Lissabonfördraget anges att rådet efter att ha hört Europaparlamentet får ange närmare hur dessa förbud ska tillämpas (artikel 103.2 i EUF-fördraget).”

***

Lissabonin sopimus

The Finnish ratification bill, ‘Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle Euroopan unionista tehdyn sopimuksen ja Euroopan yhteisön perustamissopimuksen muuttamisesta tehdyn Lissabonin sopimuksen hyväksymisestä ja laiksi sen lainsäädännön alaan kuuluvien määräysten voimaansaattamisesta’ (HE 23/2008 vp), discusses economic and monetary policy (Talous- ja rahapolitiikka) on pages 209 to 214.

The ratification bill briefly describes Article 103 TFEU (ToL), renumbered Article 125 TFEU, where the union is not liable for member states’ debts or commitments, as essentially the same as Article III-183 Constitution and Article 103 TEC, [but it does not mention that the member states lack liability]. It then remarks on the expansion of paragraph 2 (page 210):

”103 artikla (uusi 125 artikla), jonka mukaan unioni ei ole vastuussa jäsenvaltioiden veloista tai niiden muista antamista taloudellisista sitoumuksista, vastaa asiasisällöltään perustuslakisopimuksen III-183 ja SEY 103 artiklaa.

Artiklan 2 kohtaa on laajennettu niin, että sen perusteella voidaan antaa myös 101 ja 102 artiklan soveltamista varten tarvittavat tarkemmat määräykset.”


The Finnish ratification bill is available at:

http://www.finlex.fi/fi/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf


The Swedish language version of the ratification bill ‘Regeringens proposition till Riksdagen med förslag om godkännande av Lissabonfördraget om ändring av fördraget om Europeiska unionen och fördraget om upprättandet av Europeiska gemenskapen och till lag om sättande i kraft av de bestämmelser i fördraget som hör till området för lagstiftningen’ (RP 23/2008 rd), makes the same remarks under ’Ekonomisk och monetär politik’ on Article 103 TFEU (ToL), the future Article 125 TFEU, on page 213:

”Artikel 103 (blivande artikel 125), enligt vilken unionen inte ska ansvara för medlemsstaternas skulder eller andra ekonomiska förpliktelser, motsvarar i sak artikel III-183 i det konstitutionella fördraget och artikel 103 i EG-fördraget.

Artikel 103.2 har utvidgats så att med stöd av den får antas även närmare bestämmelser som behövs för tillämpningen av artiklarna 101 och 102.”

The ratification bill in Swedish can be accessed at:

http://www.finlex.fi/sv/esitykset/he/2008/20080023.pdf

***


de Poncins

Étienne de Poncins offers a few general comments on EU economic governance and budget matters, ‘La gouvernance économique et les questions budgétaires’ in his ‘Le traité de Lisbonne en 27 clés’ (Éditions Lignes de Repères, 2008), pages 245─251, but nothing specific on Article 125 TFEU.


Fischer

‚Der Vertrag von Lissabon‘, by Klemens H. Fischer (Nomos, Stämpfli & Verlag Österreich, 2008), traces the amendments Article by Article; here on pages 265─266. He offers the following statement on paragraph 2:

„Der bisherige Text von Absatz 2 wird gestrichen und durch einen neuen Text ersetzt, demgemäß in Hinkunft nicht mehr das Zustimmungsverfahren, sondern das Anhörungsverfahren zur Anwendung gelangt.“


Priollaud and Siritzky

François-Xavier Priollaud and David Siritzky offer a short introductory explanation on economic and monetary policy (pages 246 and 247) and on economic policy coordination, including the treaty amendments (pages 248 to 250) in their book ‘Le traité de Lisbonne – Commentaire, article par article, des nouveaux traités européens (TUE et TFUE)’ (La Documentation française, Paris, 2008), but there is no comment on Article 125 TFEU.

***

Consultation procedure

Just in case someone wants to reflect on the consultation procedure (and other decision-making procedures), Martin Gellermann offers a description in Rudolf Streinz (Hrsgb.): EUV/EGV Vertrag über die Europäische Union und Vertrag zur Gründung der Europäischen Gemeinschaft (C.H.Beck, 2003). I quote the beginning of Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren (page 2204):

„Als Ursprungsmodell für eine Beteiligung des Europäischen Parlaments am Prozess der gemeinschaftlichen Rechtsetzung erscheint das Konsultations- oder Anhörungsverfahren in dem der Kommission das Initiativrecht, dem Parlament eine Beratungsbefugnis und dem Rat das alleinige Entscheidungsrecht gebührt.“


Ralf Grahn