Showing posts with label expat. Show all posts
Showing posts with label expat. Show all posts

Sunday, 31 October 2010

Know your rights as an EU citizen

Are you moving within the European Union? Are you looking for work in another EU country, or are you setting up shop? Is your employer turning you into an expat? Do you want to spend retirement in another EU member state? Are there family reasons for relocating? Do you want to bring your non-EU family members into the European Union?

There are different reasons for relocating, but you should know your rights as an EU citizen. The European Commission now offers you the means to sort out the basics, before you meet public officials or turn to outside experts for advice.

At the European Commission’s DG Justice, vice-president Viviane Reding published a number of new documents concerning EU citizenship this week. (As a consequence, the informational quality of the DG Justice web pages is starting to improve, although many of them still resemble archives more than communication in real time.)

One of the positive actions was a new brochure for EU citizens, published as a high and a low resolution version in 22 languages. The freedom to move and to reside in the European Union is relevant for mobile citizens of the European Union, who plan to move to another EU country or already live outside their country of origin. It also concerns their non-EU family members:

Freedom to move and live in Europe - A Guide to your rights as an EU citizen (40 pages)

The thirteen chapter headings give you an idea of what you can expect to find basic guidance on:


Chapter 1 What is EU citizenship?
Chapter 2 Who can benefit?
Chapter 3 Where can you exercise this right?
Chapter 4 Preparing to move
Schengen rules
Chapter 5 The first three months
Reporting your presence
Chapter 6 After three months
Chapter 7 Administrative formalities
EU citizens
Non-EU family members
Sanctions
Chapter 8 Keeping the right to reside
Family members
Chapter 9 Right of permanent residence
Administrative requirements
Chapter 10 Equal treatment
Chapter 11 Restrictions
Chapter 12 Transitional arrangements for workers
Chapter 13 How to protect your rights

Besides the Treaty provisions on EU citizenship, the so called Citizenship Directive 2004/38 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States is important for you and 11 million other mobile union citizens.




Ralf Grahn



P.S. Perhaps you should stay on top of what is happening in the European Union. Nowadays online communication offers you unprecedented ease of access to mainstream media and social media in Europe. Multilingual Bloggingportal.eu aggregates the posts from 686 blogs related to the European Union and the Council of Europe. These Euroblogs keep you up to date and they give you the opportunity to hone your language skills.

Friday, 8 October 2010

Why is Europe falling behind? Look at EU patent

The governments of the EU member states meet in the Council of the European Union, Monday to Tuesday (11 to 12 October 2010) in Luxembourg.

Yes, even when the Council presidency is in Belgian hands (Brussels), the October Council meetings are held in the Grand Duchy.



Internal market



The Council configuration known as Competitiveness (Internal Market, Industry, Research and Space) has the following internal market items on its agenda:



– Proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent
– Political orientation
Public deliberation



– Functioning of the internal market

(a) Communication from the Commission: Single market delivering smart sustainable and inclusive economic growth
– Presentation by the Commission
– Exchange of views
Public debate

(b) Report from the Commission on monitoring the retail market
– Progress report





You can follow press conferences and public deliberations by video streaming, courtesy of the audiovisual services of the Council.




EU Patent


If you want to understand why Europe is falling behind, you can study the neverending(?) history of the future Community Patent, nowadays the EU Patent, with the Commission’s latest proposal for translation arrangements (press release 1 July 2010, IP/10/870) and Frequently Asked Questions (MEMO/10/291).

The official Commission communication is:




Proposal for a Council Regulation (EU) on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent; Brussels, 30.6.2010 COM(2010) 350 final; consultation procedure2010/0198 (CNS)



Around the time of the informal meeting of competitiveness ministers (internal market) on 29 to 30 September, EurActiv reported on the efforts of the Belgian EU Council presidency to find a compromise in the battle about the language regime for the EU patent, and suggested that the deadlock may lead to the launch of enhanced cooperation between a group of member states. Nikki Tate in the Financial Times essentially had the same story.





Europolitics presents the state of play (= blockade) between the member states (7 October 2010), as does Simon Taylor in the European Voice (7 October 2010).



Legal: Unanimity for language regime


In the Lisbon Treaty the member states were able to agree on the ordinary legislative procedure for European intellectual property rights, but unable to include the language requirements, which need unanimity.

The member states failed then and will probably fail again, leaving European businesses with ten times the costs of patent protection in the USA.

The relevant provision is Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, with the language regime in the second paragraph (OJEU 30.3.2010 C 83/96):


Article 118 TFEU

In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union-wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements.

The Council, acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, shall by means of regulations establish language arrangements for the European intellectual property rights. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament.


Sweden



Ewa Björling, who continues as trade minister in Fredrik Reinfeldt’s new Swedish government appointed 5 October 2010, says that Sweden supports the three-language regime proposed by the Commission (English, German, French).

On the same page there is a link to the customary annotated agenda (kommenterad dagordning; in doc form), posted yesterday. The document states that two member states are opposed to the Commission proposal, but diplomatically it does not name Italy and Spain.

If the Council fails to reach unanimity, Sweden is willing to initiate enhanced cooperation for a working language regime.



Denmark



The Europe Committee of the Danish Parliament (Folketingets Europaudvalg) offers a memorandum on the issues for the Competitiveness Council (with the EU patent language regime from page 8).

It recalls the Commission’s original proposal (for a then Community patent) in 2000 and the negotiation history, and notes the unanimity requirement in Article 118(2) TFEU. A unanimous decision on the language arrangements is needed for the political agreement on the rest of European patent protection, negotiated during the Swedish EU Council presidency, to enter into force.

Provisionally, Denmark supports a possible compromise based on a restricted language regime, but the memorandum notes that the Council presidency and the Commission have indicated starting the process towards enhanced cooperation in case of failure.



Unanimity

The EU patent is an example of ‘freely cooperating, sovereign nation states’, and European businesses continue to foot the bill until the deadlock is broken.




Ralf Grahn




P.S. I have decided to give my “domestic” Grahnlaw blog a new twist. Instead of, or at least in addition to cross-posting EU entries in Finnish from Eurooppaoikeus, I intend to blog in Finnish, Swedish and English about entrepreneurship, work and expats in Finland, giving the blog a distinct identity.

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

EFTA member Switzerland outside EEA and EU

The relationship between Switzerland and the European Union is of interest to governments, businesses and residents, including expats.


Yesterday, in the Grahnlaw blog post Internal market: Switzerland at the heart of Europe? we highlighted the briefing paper commissioned by the European Parliament on the complex relationship between the European Union and Switzerland with regard to the internal market:



Christa Tobler, Jeroen Hardenbol & Balázs Mellár: Internal Market beyond the EU: EEA and Switzerland (PE 429.993; January 2010; 65 pages).

In this blog post we present references to some basic materials on Switzerland’s relations with the rest of Europe.



Switzerland is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), together with Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. However, unlike the three others, Switzerland is not a part of the European Economic Area (EEA).



For a fairly updated general presentation of EFTA, see This is EFTA 2009 (January 2009; 36 pages).



The latest annual update is the 48th Annual Report of the European Free Trade Association 2008 (March 2009; 52 pages).



In English and with further links, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO offers general information about EFTA, the European Policy of Switzerland and Bilateral Agreements Switzerland – European Union.



Through the web page Bilateral agreements Switzerland-EU you can access a brochure from August 2009 with further information: Bilateral agreements Switzerland-EU (44 pages)



There is also a page with links to Other files Switzerland-EU.




For a more political Swiss view on why Switzerland remains outside both the European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA), you can read the article by Werner Wüthrich: The Future Belongs to Lean Organizations like EFTA (Current Concerns No 1, January 2010).




Ralf Grahn







P.S. Sooner or later, I believe, the European Union has to become more openly and directly party political in order to be understood and approved by EU citizens.

Heralding this future of active citizens are the bilingual mirror blogs by a French PES activist: Eurosocialist in English and Eurosocialiste in French. Her motto is: A socialist view on Europe, a European view on socialism.

Eurosocialist/Eurosocialiste are listed among 522 great Euroblogs (at the latest count) on growing multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, your useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, more than thirty policy areas, communication, economics, finance, business, civil society and law.

At the same time Euroblogs are an agreeable way to brush up one’s skills in foreign languages.

If you are interested in the EU or the euroblogosphere, you can also subscribe to the RSS feed for new blog posts appearing on Bloggingportal.eu.

By the way, I also discuss European issues in Finnish on Eurooppaoikeus and in Swedish on Grahnblawg.

Schengen residents with long-stay visa: Proposals on freedom to travel

There is a problem concerning circulation within the Schengen area without internal borders for third-country nationals legally residing in one of the Schengen states on the basis of a long-stay "D" visa issued by that member state:

Lacking a residence permit, D visa holders are not allowed to travel to the other member states during their stay; nor are they allowed to transit through the other states when returning to their country of origin, as this is not provided for by the Schengen Convention.


Due to the different legal bases and procedures, the European Commission made two parallel proposals in order to remedy the problem:





Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement as regards long stay visa and alerts in the Schengen Information System; Brussels, 27.2.2009 COM(2009) 90 final (11 pages)




Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of […] amending the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards movement of persons with a long-stay visa; Brussels, 27.2.2009 COM(2009) 91 final (11 pages)


The aim of the proposals is to extend the principle of equivalence between a residence permit and short-stay visas to long-stay D visas; hence a long-stay visa would have the same effects as a residence permit as regards circulation in the Schengen area.



Visa Code


Meanwhile, the Visa Code, Regulation 810/2009 has been approved:




REGULATION (EC) No 810/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 July 2009 establishing a Community Code on Visas (Visa Code); published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 15.9.2009 L 243/1



Article 1
Objective and scope

1. This Regulation establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for transit through or intended stays in the territory of the Member States not exceeding three months in any six-month period.

2. The provisions of this Regulation shall apply to any third-country national who must be in possession of a visa when crossing the external borders of the Member States pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of 15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement, without prejudice to:

(a) the rights of free movement enjoyed by third-country nationals who are family members of citizens of the Union;

(b) the equivalent rights enjoyed by third-country nationals and their family members, who, under agreements between the Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and these third countries, on the other, enjoy rights of free movement equivalent to those of Union citizens and members of their families.

3. This Regulation also lists the third countries whose nationals are required to hold an airport transit visa by way of exception from the principle of free transit laid down in Annex 9 to the Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation, and establishes the procedures and conditions for issuing visas for the purpose of transit through the international transit areas of Member States’ airports.



Regulation 810/2009, the Visa Code will apply from 5 April 2010.



Lisbon Treaty


The Treaty of Lisbon entered into force on 1 December 2009, so both proposals will probably be adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure.


***


We will return to look at the progress of the proposals to ease the travel restrictions on residents with long-stay visas.




Ralf Grahn







P.S. Sooner or later, I believe, the European Union has to become more openly and directly party political in order to become understood and approved by EU citizens.

Heralding this future of active citizens are the bilingual mirror blogs by a French PES activist: Eurosocialist in English and Eurosocialiste in French. Her motto is: A socialist view on Europe, a European view on socialism.

Eurosocialist/Eurosocialiste are listed among 522 great Euroblogs (at the latest count) on growing multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, your useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, more than thirty policy areas, communication, economics, finance, business, civil society and law.

At the same time Euroblogs are an agreeable way to brush up one’s skills in foreign languages.

If you are interested in the EU or the euroblogosphere, you can also subscribe to the RSS feed for new blog posts appearing on Bloggingportal.eu.

By the way, I also discuss European issues in Finnish on Eurooppaoikeus and in Swedish on Grahnblawg.

Friday, 22 January 2010

Discrimination frustrates free movement in the EU

The free movement of people has been an aim since the 1957 EEC Treaty. Discrimination on grounds of nationality has been prohibited for as long. Directive 2004/38 on the right of the citizens of the (European) Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States is supposed to enhance and protect these rights.



However, restrictive and discriminatory practices persist in the EU member states, making a mockery out of citizens’ rights. A short blog post on Talking about the EU – Moving on up (21 January 2010) – started a revealing discussion about Kafkaesque experiences of absurd practices facing people who move from one EU country to another (Britain).

From Sainsbury’s not accepting EU identity cards to problems opening a bank account, renting a flat or getting a contract for a mobile phone or broadband access, the ingenuity of private firms and landlords to frustrate movers seems endless.

This is an important discussion about the everyday experiences of EU citizens. You can contribute to the discussion on Talking about the EU.

What have you or your expat friends experienced?

What should be done?





Ralf Grahn




P.S. Educate yourself and brush up your language skills by reading Euroblogs. On Bruxelles2 (in French) the journalist Nicolas Grosverheyde writes expertly about the security and defence issues facing the European Union.



Bruxelles2 is listed with more than 500 great Euroblogs on growing multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, your useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, policies, communication, economics, finance, business, civil society and law. You can also subscribe to the RSS feed for new blog posts appearing on Bloggingportal.eu.

By the way, I also discuss European issues in Finnish on Eurooppaoikeus and in Swedish on Grahnblawg.

Saturday, 8 March 2008

EU TFEU: Citizen’s right to vote

The electoral rights of EU citizens do not evolve as a result of the Treaty of Lisbon, which retains the right to vote in local elections and in elections to the European Parliament in one’s member state of residence, as well as the right to stand as a candidate in these elections.

Regional and national elections are still uncovered by common provisions for EU expats.

***

We notice that the intergovernmental conference (IGC 2007) leaves a gap in the Treaty of Lisbon between point 35 (Article 18 TEC) and point 36 (Article 20 TEC). See OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/51-52.

We discover the missing Article 19 TEC in the Annex Tables of equivalences referred to in Article 5 of the Treaty of Lisbon (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/206), where we find out that Article 19 TEC remains Article 19 TFEU (ToL), until it is renumbered Article 22 TFEU.

In addition, the IGC humours us by, under horizontal amendments, in point 3 listing specific Articles to be amended in the following way (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/42):

3) In the following Articles, the words ‘acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission’
shall be replaced by ‘acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure’:
— Article 13, renumbered 16 E, first paragraph
— Article 19(1)
— Article 19(2)
— Article 22, second paragraph
— Article 93
— Article 94, renumbered 95
— Article 104(14), second subparagraph
— Article 175(2), first subparagraph

***

After playing IGC style hide and seek, and after coining today’s oxymoron, ‘specific horizontal amendment’, we are ready to take on the current Article 19 TEC (found in the latest consolidated version of the TEU and the TEC, in OJ 29.12.2006 C 321 E/50):

Article 19 TEC

1. Every citizen of the Union residing in a Member State of which he is not a national shall have the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections in the Member State in which he resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State. This right shall be exercised subject to detailed arrangements adopted by the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament; these arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

2. Without prejudice to Article 190(4) and to the provisions adopted for its implementation, every citizen of the Union residing in a Member State of which he is not a national shall have the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament in the Member State in which he resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State. This right shall be exercised subject to detailed arrangements adopted by the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament; these arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

***

The Lisbon Treaty version of Article 19 should look like this:

Article 19 TFEU (ToL), after renumbering Article 22 TFEU

1. Every citizen of the Union residing in a Member State of which he is not a national shall have the right to vote and to stand as a candidate at municipal elections in the Member State in which he resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State. This right shall be exercised subject to detailed arrangements adopted by the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament; these arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

2. Without prejudice to Article 190(1) [renumbered Article 223(1)] and to the provisions adopted for its implementation, every citizen of the Union residing in a Member State of which he is not a national shall have the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament in the Member State in which he resides, under the same conditions as nationals of that State. This right shall be exercised subject to detailed arrangements adopted by the Council, acting unanimously in accordance with a special legislative procedure and after consulting the European Parliament; these arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

***

For a look at the intermediary stages leading up to the Treaty of Lisbon, we turn to the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, proposed by the European Convention (OJ 18.7.2003 C 169/30):

Article III-10 Draft Constitution

A European law or framework law of the Council of Ministers shall determine the detailed arrangements for exercising the right, referred to in Article I-8, for every Union citizen to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections and elections to the European Parliament in their Member State of residence without being a national of that State. The Council of Ministers shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament. These arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

The right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament shall be exercised without prejudice to Article III-232(2) and the measures adopted for its implementation.

***

The IGC 2004 took over the proposal in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe almost word for word, with natural changes of the Articles referred to (OJ 16.12.2004 C 310/57):

Article III-126 Constitution

A European law or framework law of the Council shall determine the detailed arrangements for exercising the right, referred to in Article I-10(2)(b), for every citizen of the Union to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections and elections to the European Parliament in his or her Member State of residence without being a national of that State. The Council shall act unanimously after consulting the European Parliament. These arrangements may provide for derogations where warranted by problems specific to a Member State.

The right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament shall be exercised without prejudice to Article III-330(1) and the measures adopted for its implementation.

***

We see that the draft Constitution and the Constitutional Treaty used one paragraph to cover both municipal elections and elections to the European Parliament, where the current TEC and the ToL award the different elections their own paragraphs, but nothing changes in substance.

Citizens of the European Union have achieved essential equality with the nationals of their member state of residence at two levels, their municipality and the EU.

***

Equal rights are not all-encompassing, since derogations are possible for certain states. In practice, the only member state to request (a continued) derogation in 2009 is Luxembourg with its high proportion of expats. See:

Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and to the Council on granting a derogation pursuant to Article 19(2) of the EC Treaty, presented under Article 14(3) of Directive 93/109/EC on the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament COM/2007/0846 final

***

National and (where applicable) regional elections are still outside the common arrangements, as are referendums irrespective of level.

For most people electoral rights are the ones that matter, but the active right to stand as a candidate is on offer in municipal and EP level elections.

***

The legal base for the election procedure to the European Parliament is currently in Article 190(4) TEC, proposed to become modified Article 190(1) TFEU (ToL), after renumbering Article 223(1) TFEU.

The European Parliament draws up a proposal, and the Council unanimously lays down the necessary provisions after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament. The provisions have to be ratified by the member states. (See Article 190 TEC and OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/100, point 179.)

***

For the current rules on EP elections, you could start by looking up Council Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom of 25 June 2002 and 23 September 2002 amending the Act concerning the election of the representatives of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage, annexed to Decision 76/787/ECSC, EEC, Euratom (OJ 21.10.2002 L 283).

***

With a view to the EP elections of June 2009, the following documents could be mentioned, starting with the report on the latest elections:

Communication from the Commission European elections 2004 – Commission report on the participation of European Union citizens in the Member State of residence (Directive 93/109/EC) and on the electoral arrangements (Decision 76/787/EC as amended by Decision 2002/772/EC, Euratom)

Commission Staff Working document Accompanying document to the Communication from the Commission European elections 2004 - Commission report on the participation of European Union citizens in the Member States of residence (Directive 93/109/EC) and on the electoral arrangements (Decision 76/787/EC as amended by Decision 2002/772/EC) Impact assessment report for a possible amendment of Council Directive 93/109/EC laying down detailed arrangements for exercising the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals

Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 93/109/EC of 6 December 1993 as regards certain detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament for citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals

***

For the sake of readers with an interest in UK affairs, two unilateral Lisbon Treaty declarations can be mentioned (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/268):

63. Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the definition of the term ‘nationals’

In respect of the Treaties and the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in any of the acts deriving from those Treaties or continued in force by those Treaties, the United Kingdom reiterates the Declaration it made on 31 December 1982 on the definition of the term ‘nationals’ with the exception that the reference to ‘British Dependent Territories Citizens’ shall be read as meaning ‘British overseas territories citizens’.

64. Declaration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the franchise for elections to the European Parliament

The United Kingdom notes that Article 9 A of the Treaty on European Union and other provisions of the Treaties are not intended to change the basis for the franchise for elections to the European Parliament.

***

The first rules on direct elections to the European Parliament were issued in 1976, and the first directly elected EP commenced work in 1979. The next EP elections are due in June 2009.

If the Treaty of Lisbon is in force at the time, the elections to the European Parliament are to be taken into account in the process of electing the next President of the Commission. This offers the citizens of the European Union the opportunity to influence the choice to one of the top jobs within the EU, since the political parties at the European level are expected to field their candidates for the post.

The ‘Who do I call?’ campaign has seized on the possibility left open by the Lisbon Treaty to merge the offices of Commission and European Council presidents, to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the EU, although Declaration number 6 to indicates that the European leaders would have to change tack, since they still seem have three different office holders in mind (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/248):

6. Declaration on Article 9 B(5) and (6), Article 9 D(6) and (7) and Article 9 E of the Treaty on European Union

In choosing the persons called upon to hold the offices of President of the European Council, President of the Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, due account is to be taken of the need to respect the geographical and demographic diversity of the Union and its Member States.

***

Lisbon Treaty Declaration 11 envisions consultations between the European Parliament and the European Council only regarding the President of the European Commission (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/252):

11. Declaration on Article 9 D(6) and (7) of the Treaty on European Union

The Conference considers that, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties, the European Parliament and the European Council are jointly responsible for the smooth running of the process leading to the election of the President of the European Commission. Prior to the decision of the European Council, representatives of the European Parliament and of the European Council will thus conduct the necessary consultations in the framework deemed the most appropriate. These consultations will focus on the backgrounds of the candidates for President of the Commission, taking account of the elections to the European Parliament, in accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9 D(7). The arrangements for such consultations may be determined, in due course, by common accord between the European Parliament and the European Council.

***

EU citizens’ rights in municipal elections are governed by a Directive last amended by Directive 2006/106/EC in 2006, so look for the consolidated version of:

Council Directive 94/80/EC of 19 December 1994 laying down detailed arrangements for the exercise of the right to vote and to stand as a candidate in municipal elections by citizens of the Union residing in a Member State of which they are not nationals

Ralf Grahn