Showing posts with label free movement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label free movement. Show all posts

Tuesday, 17 January 2017

A single market to consumers and citizens (2010) introduced

The latest Grahnlaw blog post concerning the development of the internal market during this decade looked at the report by professor Mario Monti: A new strategy for the single market at the service of Europe’s economy and society (9 May 2010; 107 pages).


Consumers and citizens

In parallel with Monti’s work the European Parliament prepared an own-initiative report - 2010/2011(INI) -  drafted by Louis Grech (S&D) and approved 3 May 2010 by the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) for the plenary.

The report on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens A7-0132/2010 was debated in the EP plenary on 19 May 2010 together with three other reports - here a summary of the discussion in Swedish - and voted the following day: 578 for, 28 against and 16 abstentions.


Resolution P7_TA(2010)0186

After documenting the relevant internal market policy and assessment papers at the time, the European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2010 on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens P7_TA(2010)0186 reminded readers of the remaining obstacles  in the way of citizens, consumers and SMEs wishing to move, shop, sell or trade across borders with the same sense of security and confidence they enjoy in their own member states.

***

Today, this is a potent reminder of how negligently many national (even European Council and EU Council) politicians treat their duty to promote the EU citizenship right to move and reside freely, as well as the four internal market freedoms: the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital.


Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 31 December 2016

The essence of the EU’s internal market

What is the essence of the internal market, often (aspirationally) called the single market in English (although this distinction not made in all of the official languages of the European Union)?


Social market economy

Among the aims of the European Union we find “a highly competitive social market economy” in Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU):

3.   The Union shall establish an internal market. It shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance.


Free movement x 4

Instead of being confined to the national markets, the factors of production are supposed to move without obstacles in the internal market. Article 26(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) expresses the goal in the form of four - not only one - freedoms of movement, also known as the four freedoms:

2.   The internal market shall comprise an area without internal frontiers in which the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital is ensured in accordance with the provisions of the Treaties.


Non-discrimination

Non-discrimination on the grounds of nationality is central to the tearing down of obstacles in the union generally and the internal market specifically. From Article 18 TFEU:

Within the scope of application of the Treaties, and without prejudice to any special provisions contained therein, any discrimination on grounds of nationality shall be prohibited.



CJEU

These basic principles, other treaty provisions and the rest of the EU legislation (acquis) have been brought to life by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).


EEA

The European Economic Area (EEA) extends the internal markets to three of the four EFTA states: Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Switzerland, the fourth member of the European Free Trade Area (EFTA), has more limited access to the internal market based on bilateral agreements with the EU.


Brexit

According to Eurostat the population of the internal market was 515,640,100 at the beginning of 2016 (EU + EEA). If Brexit means that the population of the whole United Kingdom (about 65 million) leaves the internal market (not only the EU, but the EEA as well), about 450 million would remain, somewhat smaller than the combined 480,516,824 population (2016 estimate) of the less integrated North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) countries Canada, Mexico and the USA.
 

Summary

The aim of the internal market, which consists of 31 countries with a total population of 515 million, is a highly competitive social market economy by the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital and the prohibition of all discrimination on grounds of nationality.


Ralf Grahn

Monday, 19 March 2012

Single Market Act COM(2011) 206

The article Public consultation on EU Single Market Act (SMA) brought us close to the final version of the Commission's reform programme 2011-2012. Archimedes would have been happy to see most of the 22 language versions of the communication employ the concept ”lever” in some form. Heureka!, here is the English version (pdf):

Single Market Act: Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence - "Working together to create new growth”; Brussels, 13.4.2011 COM(2011) 206 final (26 pages)


Single Market Act COM(2011) 206

Here, as a reminder, are the twelve levers, each with a key action (source: Annex 1, page 24-25):


Access to finance for SMEs (4th quarter 2011)

1 Legislation designed to make it easier for venture capital funds established in a Member State to invest freely in any other Member State, without obstacles or additional requirements


Mobility for citizens (4th quarter 2011)

2 Legislation modernising the system for recognising professional qualifications


Intellectual property rights (2nd quarter 2011)

3 Legislation setting up a unitary patent protection for the greatest possible number of Member States and a unified patent litigation system with the objective of issuing the first EU patents in 2013


Consumer empowerment (4th quarter 2011)

4 Legislation on Alternative Dispute Resolution. This action will also include an electronic commerce dimension.


Services (2nd quarter 2011)

5 Revision of the legislation on the European standardisation system, to extend it to services and make standardisation procedures more effective, efficient and inclusive


Networks (4th quarter 2011, 3rd quarter 2011)

6 Energy and transport infrastructure legislation serving to identify and roll out strategic projects of European interest and to ensure interoperability and intermodality


Digital single market (1st quarter 2012)

7 Legislation ensuring the mutual recognition of electronic identification and authentication across the EU and revision of the Directive on Electronic Signatures


Social entrepreneurship (4th quarter 2011)

8 Legislation setting up a European framework for social investment funds


Taxation (2nd quarter 2011)

9 Review of the Energy Tax Directive in order to ensure consistent treatment of different sources of energy, so as to better take into account the energy content of products and their CO2 emission level


Social cohesion (4th quarter 2011)

10 Legislation aimed at improving and reinforcing the transposition, implementation and enforcement in practice of the Posting of Workers Directive, together with legislation aimed at clarifying the exercise of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services alongside fundamental social rights


Business environment (2nd quarter 2011)

11 Simplification of the Accounting Directives


Public procurement (4th quarter 2011)

12 Revised and modernised public procurement legislative framework


Success criteria

The Commission saw four conditions as necessary for the success of the single market programme (page 20):

For the proposed actions to produce the effects expected in terms of growth and jobs, the conditions for their development and efficient implementation must be met. There are four such conditions: (1) a better dialogue with civil society as a whole; (2) a close partnership with the various market participants; (3) efficient provision of information for citizens and enterprises; and (4) closer monitoring of the application of single-market legislation.



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. The multilingual Bloggingportal.eu already aggregates the posts from 941 Euroblogs. They represent an important part of the emerging European online public sphere, discussion across national and linguistic borders. One of the most promising fresh entrants is the LSE European Politics and Policy EUROPP blog, where Ronny Patz recently wrote about the EU blogosphere and called for more specialists and academics to widen the debate closer to real life.

Among the Euroblogs on Bloggingportal.eu you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), the Nordic Grahnblawg (written in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). I write and speak about democracy and openness in the European Union, but increasingly about the challenges of growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making.

Thursday, 10 November 2011

More Europe Manifesto for free travel

As I mentioned yesterday, a group of Spanish eurobloggers has launched an appeal for More Europe, in order to overcome the impending catastrophe in the eurozone and the wider European Union.

You can join the appeal on the More Europe blog and you can participate in the Twitter discussion @moreurope.

They act as EU citizens, so they want to build on European achievements important for ordinary people. Their appeal is now available in eight languages.

After stating the need for greater European integration, the first concrete accomplishment they want to safeguard is the right to free movement.


“More Europe” Statement

Given the dramatic social situation in many Member States caused by the economical crisis and the anti-European voices predicting the breakup of the Economic and Monetary Union, the undersigned ask for More Europe.

We consider it is necessary to move to a greater European integration in order to address the current situation of social and economic crisis affecting Europe and for this reason we will join our forces as European citizens. To achieve our goal we claim that:

1) The Schengen area of free movement is the result of the political and social work of a generation knowing the devastating consequences of World War II. The Schengen area guarantees equality, security, communication, cooperation and, to sum up, freedom between European citizens. This statement supports the defense of the EU area as a whole. Any exception on this means unequal rights among European citizens and residents.
***

The Schengen Agreement was later incorporated into the EU Treaties. The Schengen Area of free travel now comprises 25 countries, with some 400 million people, and four more countries are heading towards membership in the area of free movement.

Sign the appeal on the More Europe blog and participate in the Twitter discussion @moreurope.



Ralf Grahn

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

EU citizenship: What is progress?

Yesterday I thought about the meaning of progress, when I read the progress report from the Commission:

On progress towards effective EU Citizenship 2007-2010; Brussels 27.10.2010, COM(2010) 602 final

Is it progress when the member states have left it to each other and international law to create citizens of the European Union, and the Commission does not even discuss questionable decisions on mass naturalisation and potential problems? In: National and EU citizenship: What if? (30 November 2010).

Is it progress when the Commission had turned less transparent by taking away the Visa Handbook from its website, making the claimed improvements hard to verify? In: EU citizenship: Visas for family members (30 November 2010).

Perhaps you should download this version while you can: Commission decision of 19.3.2010 establishing the Handbook for the processing of visa applications and the modification of issued visas; Brussels, 19.3.2010 C(2010) 1620 final


Free movement and residence


Despite the Citizenship Directive 2004/38, the Visa Code Regulation 810/2009 and the improvements claimed by the Commission in its Visa Handbook C(2010) 1620, issues concerning the free movement and residence of EU citizens and their family members have continued to vex the people concerned during 2010. Progress report, page 7:


Additional enquiries related to free movement and residence of EU citizens and their family members were received and handled by SOLVIT. Statistics regarding the reporting period show a steady substantial increase of the percentage of free movement and residence related problems submitted to SOLVIT, rising from 15% of the SOLVIT case volume in 2007, to 20% in 2008 and 38% in 2009, when residence-related issues became the area with the biggest share of complaints (549 cases handled and closed with 92% of cases solved). In the first six months of 2010, SOLVIT received (out of a total of almost 7 000 enquiries) 1 314 enquiries on free movement and residence related issues.

There are currently 63 infringement proceedings launched against Member States in the area of free movement and residence of EU citizens.


In the area of free movement, the Commission promised to give enforcement priority (including infringement procedures), but also to address issues of abuse and fraud together with the member states and to promote the smooth administration of free movement issues (page 8 of the progress report), as presented in more detail in the EU Citizenship Report COM(2010) 603.



Ralf Grahn



P.S.For academics, blogging is almost like getting visibility in real life. Ideas on Europe is a multi-user blog site which provides an impartial and unbiased platform for informed analysis, comment and debate. The site is administered by UACES, whose membership consists of over 1000 academics, practitioners and research students. Among the active bloggers who have ventured outside the ebony towers we find promising (young) academics such as Giorgio Tabagari, Jaanika Erne, Europe on the Strand (collective), Ronny Patz, Pietro De Matteis, Nick Wright, European Geostrategy (collective) and Politika (Sandra Maria Rodrigues Balão).

Tuesday, 9 November 2010

EU citizenship: Rapid reaction to Lamassoure’s report?

What happened to Alain Lamassoure’s report The citizen and the application of community law during the French presidency of the Council of the European Union during the latter half of 2008? Perhaps it was not entirely fair to start looking for concrete progress in the midterm review written by Christian Lequesne and Olivier Rozenberg (and published by Sieps), as I did in the blog post: Towards a citizens’ EU? Lamassoure report and French presidency (7 November 2010).

Each Council presidency reports on its ‘achievements’, and the French presidency in 2008 will hardly be remembered for more modesty than others. The report French presidency of the Council of the European Union: Review and outlook 1 July – 31 December 2008 runs to 42 pages

We search in vain for the name of Lamassoure to appear anywhere in the presidency report.

However, Chapter 3 sounds promising: A Europe at the service of citizens and enterprises (pages 14-26).

We do find encouragement for the mobility of young people (page 14), the construction of a European research area (ERA) including the free movement of researchers (page 14), the promotion of vocational mobility (page 15), improving professional mobility in terms of role and location (page 19), implementing rules for coordination of social protection systems (page 19), cross-border health care (page 21), advances in developing the common area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ; page 22), and other worthwhile causes.

We have to continue to page 23 to find the headline A Europe of Justice committed to strengthening the protection of people, facilitating the daily life of citizens and increasing mutual trust. Finally, on page 24, we find two paragraphs more directly related to concrete problems encountered by mobile EU citizens:

EU citizens, particularly those who exercise their right to free movement, expect European justice to facilitate their daily and family life. In this spirit, the French Presidency did its utmost to reach a political agreement on the regulation on maintenance obligations. This led to a decision, notably for the 170 000 couples of different nationalities in Europe that divorce each year, to simplify and accelerate the recovery of alimony, be it for adults or children.

Regarding dependent persons, ratification by France of the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 will allow the Convention to enter into force. The Presidency has already managed to encourage several Member States to unite with it in a movement which should continue with a view to offering better protection from one State to another for handicapped children, wards and the elderly.

The EU citizens who exercise their right to free movement expect the EU to facilitate their daily and family life. This is acknowledged once in 42 pages, although the practical consequences were limited to quite specific instances.

There are some of his interviews and conferences in the meantime, but Alain Lamassoure’s web page Mission sur le citoyen et l’application du droit communautaire is silent on official action between the delivery of his report on 27 June 2008 and the Commission’s citizenship report 27 October 2010, exactly 28 months later.

Are the eleven million EU citizens living in another member state satisfied with the rapidity of reaction and effectiveness of response from the member states and the EU institutions?



Ralf Grahn



P.S. Responsiveness – or lack of it – comes in many shapes and colours. Yesterday Mathew Lowry published a blog entry called The Brussels bubble may be growing, but it’s still a bubble, where he looks at the real social media challenges for the EU institutions. While you are at it, profit by reading a number of Lowry’s earlier posts about the European online public space.

Sunday, 7 November 2010

Towards a citizens’ EU? Lamassoure report and French presidency

The free movement of persons is a fine principle, but in his 2008 report Alain Lamassoure MEP described the problems mobile EU citizens faced in real life with regard to cross-border healthcare, social security, the recognition of diplomas and professional qualifications, car registration and exports, fragmented consumer markets and consumer protection standards, and family and inheritance law, to name just a few.

In a nutshell, Lamassoure concluded that (page 32-33):

In practical terms, citizens need security and legal simplicity just as businesses do…Laws are not made for their authors, nor for the philosophers – but for their subjects, in the sense of the people who have to abide by the law. There are cases where abuses of subsidiarity are more to be feared than abuses of uniformity.

Referring to Eurobarometer opinion polls, Lamassoure stated that more than 9 out of 10 people want judicial cooperation in civil matters, particularly in family matters (page 44).

Based on the problems, needs and opinions, Lamassoure entered into a lengthy discussion about the relative merits of directly applicable regulations versus directives transposed into national legislation, including the quality of transposition and infringement procedures (page 48-55).

After discussing the adoption and transposition of European laws, Lamassoure turned to the citizen facing the national administrations (from page 56). He presented the various EU information channels and advisory services, often little known among the public. Thereafter he gave examples of bewildering administrative practices, with cross-border workers in some areas especially frustrated. There is a gap between European case law and legal acts on the one hand, and application on the ground on the other hand. Further, he discussed problems related to legal remedies.

It is somewhat depressing to see how complex and intractable the every day problems can be for mobile Europeans.

The report was requested by the president of France, Nicolas Sarkozy, and drafted by a French member of the European Parliament, Alain Lamassoure, ahead of the French presidency of the Council of the European Union, so many of the proposals for improvement are directed at the French government preparing to chair the European Council and the different Council configurations. But Lamassoure’s broad canvas includes a considerable number of suggestions for the EU institutions and the member states.

The report is a natural introduction to the various issues concerning EU citizens in cross-border situations, and it serves as the basis for evaluating later EU actions and laws intended to improve their situation.

The report exists in at least three language versions, the French original, a German translation and the English translation we have used here:

Alain LAMASSOURE, Député européen: LE CITOYEN ET L’APPLICATION DU DROIT COMMUNAUTAIRE Rapport au Président de la République (8 juin 2008 ; 188 pages)

Alain LAMASSOURE, Mitglied des Europäischen Parlaments: DER BÜRGER UND DIE ANWENDUNG DES GEMEINSCHAFTSRECHTS Bericht an den Staatspräsidenten( 8. Juni 2008)

Alain LAMASSOURE, Member of the European Parliament: THE CITIZEN AND THE APPLICATION OF COMMUNITY LAW Report to the President of the Republic (8th June 2008)

Where did it lead, if anywhere?


French EU Council presidency

President Nicolas Sarkozy and French public opinion seemed to be in unison with regard to the need to protect French (and EU citizens) from the “threats” of globalisation, but it is hard to see traces of the Lamassoure report or active but mundane efforts to improve the rights of ordinary EU citizens in the work of the French presidency of the Council of the European Union.

At least, this is the impression I get from the midterm review of the French EU Council presidency written by two outside experts:

Christian Lequesne and Olivier Rozenberg: The French Presidency of 2008: The Unexpected Agenda (Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies Sieps 2008:3op; 57 pages)

Is this a lopsided view?


Ralf Grahn



P.S. Bit more complicated… is a very human blog, where rose22joh writes about British and European politics, parenting, faith and life, none of them easy to combine; this makes for interesting reading.

Sunday, 31 October 2010

Know your rights as an EU citizen

Are you moving within the European Union? Are you looking for work in another EU country, or are you setting up shop? Is your employer turning you into an expat? Do you want to spend retirement in another EU member state? Are there family reasons for relocating? Do you want to bring your non-EU family members into the European Union?

There are different reasons for relocating, but you should know your rights as an EU citizen. The European Commission now offers you the means to sort out the basics, before you meet public officials or turn to outside experts for advice.

At the European Commission’s DG Justice, vice-president Viviane Reding published a number of new documents concerning EU citizenship this week. (As a consequence, the informational quality of the DG Justice web pages is starting to improve, although many of them still resemble archives more than communication in real time.)

One of the positive actions was a new brochure for EU citizens, published as a high and a low resolution version in 22 languages. The freedom to move and to reside in the European Union is relevant for mobile citizens of the European Union, who plan to move to another EU country or already live outside their country of origin. It also concerns their non-EU family members:

Freedom to move and live in Europe - A Guide to your rights as an EU citizen (40 pages)

The thirteen chapter headings give you an idea of what you can expect to find basic guidance on:


Chapter 1 What is EU citizenship?
Chapter 2 Who can benefit?
Chapter 3 Where can you exercise this right?
Chapter 4 Preparing to move
Schengen rules
Chapter 5 The first three months
Reporting your presence
Chapter 6 After three months
Chapter 7 Administrative formalities
EU citizens
Non-EU family members
Sanctions
Chapter 8 Keeping the right to reside
Family members
Chapter 9 Right of permanent residence
Administrative requirements
Chapter 10 Equal treatment
Chapter 11 Restrictions
Chapter 12 Transitional arrangements for workers
Chapter 13 How to protect your rights

Besides the Treaty provisions on EU citizenship, the so called Citizenship Directive 2004/38 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States is important for you and 11 million other mobile union citizens.




Ralf Grahn



P.S. Perhaps you should stay on top of what is happening in the European Union. Nowadays online communication offers you unprecedented ease of access to mainstream media and social media in Europe. Multilingual Bloggingportal.eu aggregates the posts from 686 blogs related to the European Union and the Council of Europe. These Euroblogs keep you up to date and they give you the opportunity to hone your language skills.

Saturday, 23 October 2010

EU free movement of persons and services: Have qualifications, will travel?

The EU Commission has published a report on how things turn out in practice for mobile professionals: Internal Market: Commission publishes reports on how Professional Qualifications Directive works in practice (22 October 2010, press release IP/10/1367; available in English, French and German).

The press release highlights a number of problems the European Commission describes as issues which deserve ‘further consideration’:

- Training requirements: the Directive provides for minimum training requirements for certain health professions (doctors, dentists, nurses, midwives, pharmacists) and veterinary surgeons which sometimes date back more than 30 years. A considerable number of authorities consider that these requirements should be reviewed; nearly all competent authorities for the professions concerned welcome the system of automatic recognition of the qualifications in question.

- Language knowledge for health professionals: persons benefiting from the recognition of their qualifications should have the necessary language knowledge for practising their profession in the host Member State.

- Automatic recognition in the areas of craft, trade and industry: there is a call for examining the rules in question which date back to the 1960s (in particular, for updating the list of activities).

- Electronic applications: the reports reveal that, generally, the recognition procedures cannot be fully completed by electronic means.

- Administrative cooperation which is built on the Internal Market Information System (IMI) is quite promising. A proactive alert mechanism ensuring prompt information exchange between national authorities on cases of professional malpractice (for all cases not yet covered under the Services Directive, in particular for health professionals) needs to be considered.


Professional qualifications

The internal market service of the European Commission offers a first page on Professional qualifications, with links to more detailed texts: news, Directive 2005/36/EC, evaluation of the directive, database on regulated professions, group of coordinators, regulatory committee, general system, specific sectors (health professionals and architects), infringements and judgments of Court of Justice, useful links, archives, and contact & help. If you encounter problems, there is also a link to the Citizens Signpost Service, now Your Europe Advice. Your Europe is a helpful resource with regard to other cross-border problems as well.

Evaluation of the Directive is the page for you, if you want first-hand knowledge about the reports from the Commission. The web pages about professional qualifications exist in English, French and German, but the reports in English only.


Directive 2005/36

We generally speak about European Union legislation, even if it would be more exact to refer to the European Economic Area (EEA), as a reminder that the directives are in force in Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway as well. Adoption is implied by the words ‘Text with EEA relevance’ after the name of a directive.

A few legal acts and corrections have modified Directive 2005/36, so the link is to the consolidated (updated) version of 27 April 2009:

DIRECTIVE 2005/36/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications

The directive, including seven annexes, runs to 148 pages, but in its day it combined fifteen separate directives into one legal act. The Directive 2005/36 is a corner stone for the free provision of services and the free movement of persons in the internal market.

Next steps

The Commission intends to consult the public (stakeholders), publish a final evaluation report next autumn (2011) and prepare a Green Paper on possible amendments (by 2012).




Ralf Grahn


P.S. Adjudicating Europe – Judicial developments in European law – has returned to active blogging in October, through two blog posts by ‘Cartesio’, both dealing with cases in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Hopefully the offer will begin to catch up with the demand for expert comment on EU case law.

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Can’t live with them, can’t live without them: European Union and Switzerland

The relations between landlocked Switzerland and the surrounding European Union are special in many respects. Trade, transport, free movement including migration and cross-border work, banking (secrecy) and tax (evasion) are highly visible ingredients. Here are a few background notes in the form of earlier blog posts and an evaluation of what the EU institutions currently offer interested businesses and citizens.

Grahnlaw blog posts

Internal market: Switzerland at the heart of Europe? (2 February 2010)

Switzerland is a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA): EFTA member Switzerland outside EEA and EU (3 February 2010).

Switzerland has previously rejected membership in the European Union (EU) as well as in the European Economic Area (EEA), which extends the internal market to Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Switzerland has concluded a host of bilateral agreements with the EU: EU and Switzerland: Bilateral treaties and challenges (5 February 2010).

Tax matters for Switzerland and the European Union (6 February 2010)

Hot tax row between Germany and Switzerland (7 February 2010)

EU against tax fraud (8 February 2010)

EEAS

Switzerland is not found among the top items on the front page of the European External Action Service (EEAS) this morning.

The EEAS pages are clear and easy to navigate. It is easy to find the country page for Switzerland, with a few basic facts and links to further sources.

The EU delegation for Switzerland and Liechtenstein in Bern offers additional information about the bilateral relations, in German, French and Italian.

The central EEAS pages are short on information about the important Schengen agreement, implemented since December 2008 (admittedly home affairs). They are also vague with regard to political perspectives and aspirations for the future relationship generally, although there are links to two presidential public appearances during the last months, one by Herman Van Rompuy and the latest one by José Manuel Barroso.

Bilateral treaties

Formally, the Treaties Office of the EU today lists 179 bilateral treaties with Switzerland, although in current discussions about 120 treaties is often mentioned as the existing (real) number.

If we look at fresh Council document references, matters concerning Schengen implementation seem to be the run of the mill cooperation issues between EU and Swiss officials (as well as with those from Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein).

More informative from a general point of view is the European Parliament resolution of 7 September 2010 on EEA-Switzerland: Obstacles with regard to the full implementation of the internal market P7_TA-PROV(2010)0300. It is based on an own-initiative report, procedure file INI/2009/2176.

Comment

My search was not exhaustive or methodical enough to unearth everything, but an attempt to find materials readily available to assess were the relations are heading. Despite the Barroso and Van Rompuy speeches I did not go into in this blog post, with regard to my objective the European Parliament came out on top, because it actually discusses problems and challenges from an important and a fairly broad perspective: trade and the free movement of services and persons (internal market).


Ralf Grahn


P.S. Presseurop is an important resource for people interested in European affairs. It presents itself in the following manner:

Presseurop.eu is a Paris based news website publishing a daily selection of articles chosen from more than 200 international news titles, then translated into ten languages - English, German, French, Spanish, Romanian, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Polish and Czech.

The multilingual blog aggregator Bloggingportal.eu brings European online discussions to a screen in front of you, from 675 EU related blogs. A few more voluntary editors are needed for tagging and selecting posts from the listed Euroblogs.

Friday, 17 September 2010

“Romagate”: Did French government target Roma? And now?

We have seen an extraordinary war of words between the European Commission and a highly strung government of France. This has tended to obscure the real issues. Let us return to some of them.

Yes, historically France has made important contributions to human rights. With its universal values, the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789) remains a milestone. The motto of the French Republic – Liberty, equality, fraternity – is also universal.

However, the Declaration did not prevent heads from rolling during the reign of Terror. Nor have later events always been free from attempts to corrupt these principles.

Through the European Convention on Human Rights and the founding values of the European Union, including the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the member states have assumed responsibilities – values and rules - to protect the rights of all people from the excesses of politicians.



Against this background, let us return to the speech by the French president Nicolas Sarkozy, which Vivien Sierens referred to on the Euros du Village blog for Les Européens du Grand Lille. (The date is wrong, but the link is genuine. I checked by going through the Elysée website directly.)



In Grenoble, 30 July 2010, after incidents concerning the public order, president Sarkozy announced a crackdown against criminals and unrest. Sarkozy announced the appointment of a new ‘préfet’ in the department to combat crime. The president listed a great number of security measures, but I have picked out only a few.

Sarkozy proposed that French citizenship be divided into two categories: irrevocable for citizens by birth and revocable for naturalised citizens. The speech did not elucidate what would happen with the stateless persons thus created:


De même nous allons réévaluer les motifs pouvant donner lieu à la déchéance de la nationalité française. Je prends mes responsabilités. La nationalité française doit pouvoir être retirée à toute personne d'origine étrangère qui aurait volontairement porté atteinte à la vie d'un fonctionnaire de police ou d'un militaire de la gendarmerie ou de toute autre personne dépositaire de l'autorité publique.


Controlled immigration of non-EU persons is naturally on the list, but also cutting public benefits and repatriation of illegal immigrants (excerpts):


Pour réussir ce processus d'intégration, il faut impérativement maîtriser le flux migratoire. Avec un taux de chômage des étrangers non communautaires qui a atteint 24% en 2009.

Nous allons donc évaluer les droits et les prestations auxquelles ont aujourd'hui accès les étrangers en situation irrégulière.

Je demande à Eric le Douaron, qui connaît bien le sujet en tant qu'ancien directeur de la PAF, de faire preuve d'une fermeté absolue dans la lutte contre l'immigration illégale. La règle générale est claire : les clandestins doivent être reconduits dans leur pays.


Against the background of cracking down on crime and illegal (non-EU) immigration, president Sarkozy went on to target illegal Roma camps and “abuse of the freedom of movement”, calling the return of migrants repatriated at state expense illegal:


Et c'est dans cet esprit d'ailleurs que j'ai demandé au ministre de l'Intérieur de mettre un terme aux implantations sauvages de campements de Roms. Ce sont des zones de non-droit qu'on ne peut pas tolérer en France. Il ne s'agit pas de stigmatiser les Roms, en aucun cas. Nous avons fait depuis la loi Besson de grands progrès pour les aires mises à leur disposition. Lorsque je suis devenu ministre de l'Intérieur en 2002, moins de 20% des aires de stationnement étaient prévues. J'ai fait le point avec le ministre. Aujourd'hui plus de 60% des aires de stationnement légales sont prévues. Les Roms qui viendraient en France pour s'installer sur des emplacements légaux sont les bienvenus. Mais en tant que chef de l'Etat, puis-je accepter qu'il y ait 539 campements illégaux en 2010 en France ? Qui peut l'accepter ?
J'ai vu que tel ou tel responsable politique disait : « mais pourquoi vous vous occupez de cela, le problème ne se pose pas ». Il ne se pose pas pour un responsable politique dont le domicile ne se trouve pas à côté d'un campement. Peut-être son opinion serait-elle différente s'il était lui-même concerné ?

Nous allons procéder d'ici fin septembre au démantèlement de l'ensemble des camps qui font l'objet d'une décision de justice. Là où cette décision de justice n'a pas encore été prise, nous engagerons des démarches pour qu'elle intervienne le plus rapidement possible. Dans les trois mois, la moitié de ces implantations sauvages auront disparu du territoire français.

Je souhaite également que dès l'automne prochain, nous réformions la loi applicable à ce type de situations. La décision d'évacuer les campements sera prise sous la seule responsabilité des préfets et leur destruction interviendra par référé du tribunal de grande instance, dans un délai bref. Nos compatriotes attendent que nous assumions nos responsabilités.

Parallèlement, je souhaite que nous engagions une importante réforme pour améliorer la lutte contre l'immigration irrégulière. Chaque année, une dizaine de milliers de migrants en situation irrégulière, dont des Roms, repartent volontairement avec une aide de l'Etat. Et l'année suivante, après avoir quitté le territoire avec une aide de l'Etat, ils reviennent en toute illégalité pour demander une autre aide de l'Etat pour repartir. Cela s'appelle « un abus du droit à la libre circulation ».


However, according to Simon Taylor writing for the European Voice, president Sarkozy yesterday made the following remarks about his government’s instructions and actions:


Referring to a internal memorandum leaked from France's interior ministry that instructed police to target Roma when clearing illegal camps, Sarkozy said the document “contained language which was likely to be misinterpreted”.

He said that as soon as he heard of it, it was replaced by a memo and that the new memo was already in circulation when Reding made her comments.

Did the French government target Roma? How is the new wording going to affect the actions on the ground?

You are the jury.




Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 10 April 2010

Freedom to travel: Schengen long-stay visas

Third-country nationals legally residing in the Schengen area on the basis of a long-stay visa have been unable to travel to other member states during their stay or to transit through the territories of other (EU) member states when returning to their home country.

A new EU Regulation now extends the principle of equivalence between residence permits and short-stay visas issued by the Member States, fully implementing the Schengen acquis to long-stay visas. As a result, a long-stay visa should have the same effects as a residence permit as regards the freedom of movement of the holder in the Schengen Area.

A third-country national holding a long-stay visa issued by a Member State should therefore be allowed to travel to other Member States for three months in any six- month period, under the same conditions as the holder of a residence permit. The Regulation does not affect the rules regarding the conditions for issuing long-stay visas:



Regulation (EU) No 265/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 March 2010 amending the Convention Implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 as regards movement of persons with a long-stay visa; published OJEU 31.3.2010 L 85/1.

The directly applicable Regulation 265/2010 entered into force on 5 April 2010.

The United Kingdom and Ireland do not take part in the new arrangement.




Ralf Grahn

Friday, 22 January 2010

Discrimination frustrates free movement in the EU

The free movement of people has been an aim since the 1957 EEC Treaty. Discrimination on grounds of nationality has been prohibited for as long. Directive 2004/38 on the right of the citizens of the (European) Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States is supposed to enhance and protect these rights.



However, restrictive and discriminatory practices persist in the EU member states, making a mockery out of citizens’ rights. A short blog post on Talking about the EU – Moving on up (21 January 2010) – started a revealing discussion about Kafkaesque experiences of absurd practices facing people who move from one EU country to another (Britain).

From Sainsbury’s not accepting EU identity cards to problems opening a bank account, renting a flat or getting a contract for a mobile phone or broadband access, the ingenuity of private firms and landlords to frustrate movers seems endless.

This is an important discussion about the everyday experiences of EU citizens. You can contribute to the discussion on Talking about the EU.

What have you or your expat friends experienced?

What should be done?





Ralf Grahn




P.S. Educate yourself and brush up your language skills by reading Euroblogs. On Bruxelles2 (in French) the journalist Nicolas Grosverheyde writes expertly about the security and defence issues facing the European Union.



Bruxelles2 is listed with more than 500 great Euroblogs on growing multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, your useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, policies, communication, economics, finance, business, civil society and law. You can also subscribe to the RSS feed for new blog posts appearing on Bloggingportal.eu.

By the way, I also discuss European issues in Finnish on Eurooppaoikeus and in Swedish on Grahnblawg.

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive proposal: Structure and essentials

Our latest blog post on European level audiovisual rules was published last year – such a long time ago - and it tried to use this example to show how we are able to follow all the official stages from an original proposal to the final legislative act, published in the Official Journal of the European Union: History of EU Audiovisual Media Services Directive (Following a legislative procedure) (31 December 2009).



The AVMS Directive 2007/65 was originally based on the Commission’s proposal COM(2005) 646 final, and key to the whole legislative procedure was Oeil, the Legislative Observatory of the European Parliament, with the procedure number (and nature) COD/2005/0260 opening up the process file.



Commission proposal COM(2005) 646 final


After the recapitulation of how to access the whole legislative process, we turn to the original proposal by the Commission:



Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL AMENDING COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities; Brussels, 13.12.2005; COM(2005) 646 final; 2005/0260 (COD); 29 pages.


(These titles are informative, but hardly media sexy.)


The useful information on the front page also told us that the proposal by the Commission was accompanied by two documents: SEC(2005) 1625 and SEC(2005) 1626.



The proposal began with an Explanatory memorandum, which presented the grounds for and objectives of the proposal, the general context, existing provisions in the area covered by the proposal, as well as consistency with other policies and objectives of the Union (pages 2 to 4).


Two paragraphs presented the essence of the matter:


In sum, the objective of the Commission’s proposal is to modernise and simplify the regulatory framework for broadcasting or linear services and introduce minimum rules for non-linear audiovisual media services.



• Existing provisions in the area covered by the proposal

Council Directive 89/552/EEC as amended by Directive 97/36/EC concerns “television broadcasting”. The present proposal amends the TVWF Directives in order to establish a modernised and flexible framework for television broadcasts, including other linear (scheduled) audiovisual media services, and to introduce a set of minimum rules for non-linear (on-demand) audiovisual media services.




Under Consultation of interested parties and impact assessment, the Commission described the consultations and some of the major issues (page 4 to 5):

• Scope of regulation (distinction between linear and non-linear services)
• Advertising (insertion and daily advertising limits)
• Protection of minors and human dignity (including incitement of hatred)
• Cultural diversity (transmission time quotas; free flow of non-linear services)
• Rights to information and short extracts


The Commission proposal listed and described the outside expert advice it had received (page 6) on the scheduling of European works and the impact of regulation on television advertising markets.


Under Impact assessment, the Commission mentioned and discussed five options, from repealing existing regulation or doing nothing to full harmonisation in the European Union (page 7 to 8).


Legal elements of the proposal discussed (page 8 to 9):

• Summary of the proposed action
• Legal basis (ativities of self-employed persons, provisions against restrictions on services)
• Subsidiarity principle (including obstacles to the freedom to provide services in the internal market)
• Proportionality principle (minimum harmonisation to ensure free movement of services in the internal market; co- and self-regulation)
• Choice of instruments


The Commission covered the points that the proposal (page 10):

• had no budgetary implications for the Community budget
• included a transitional period for the proposal
• provided for simplification of legislation
• included a review clause
• included a requirement for member states to notify transposition measures
• concerned the European Economic Area (EEA)



On page 10 and 11 the Commission offered a short explanation of the proposal, which is about the depth we want to go into in this blog post:


• Short explanation of the proposal

The aim of the revision is to define rules for audiovisual media services in a platform neutral way, which would mean that the same basic rules apply to the same kind of services. The set of applicable rules shall no longer depend on the delivery platform but on the nature of a service. The future regulation will distinguish between linear audiovisual services or “broadcasting”, including IPTV, streaming or web-casting on one side, and non-linear services, such as “video-on-demand”- services, on the other side.

The amending Directive introduces new definitions based around the notion of “audiovisual media service” in Article 1 of the amended Directive. The definition of audiovisual media services covers mass media in their function to inform, entertain and educate, but excludes any form of private correspondence, like e-mails sent to a limited number of recipients. This definition also excludes all services the principal purpose of which is not to provide audiovisual content, even where such services contain some audiovisual elements. Services where the audiovisual content is merely ancillary to and not the principal purpose of the service are not covered.

The new Articles 3c to 3h contain the basic tier of rules for all audiovisual media services. As a consequence, some of the specific provisions for television broadcasts, such as Article 7, Article 12 and Article 22a, can be abolished.

Non-linear (on-demand) services will be subject to some minimum principles with regard to

• protection of minors

• prohibition of incitement to hatred

• identification of the media service provider

• identification of commercial communication

• some qualitative restrictions for commercial communication ( ex. for alcohol or targeted at minors).

The new Article 3b introduces a rule on the non-discriminatory application of the right to short news reporting for linear services.

The main changes to Chapter IV on television advertising concern flexible rules for the insertion of advertising (amended Article 11), clear rules for product placement, the abolition of the daily limit on television advertising (old Article 18) and the dropping of quantitative restrictions with regard to teleshopping (old Article 18a).

The daily limit of three hours of advertising per days is considered obsolete, as it finds no application in practice and therefore it is deleted. The insertion rules have been simplified and made more flexible. Instead of being compelled - as is now the case – to allow 20 minutes time between each advertising break, broadcasters can now choose the most appropriate moment to insert advertising during programmes. Nonetheless, films made for television, cinematographic works, children’s programmes and news programmes may be interrupted by advertising only once per each period of 35 minutes.




Pages 12 to 29 contained the text of the proposed Audiovisual Media Services Directive.




Ralf Grahn



P.S. Gobal Europe is a website with valuable materials and an eminent blog with a Morning Brief on international affairs from a European perspective each working day. Global Europe is listed among the nearly 500 great euroblogs on multilingual Bloggingportal.eu, a useful one-stop-shop for fact, opinion and gossip on European affairs, i.a. politics, policies, economics, finance and law.

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

EU free movement: Tax exemptions for personal property

Here is information for those who move to another EU member state. A new codified Directive has been published on tax exemptions for personal property:

Council Directive 2009/55/EC of 25 May 2009 on tax exemptions applicable to the permanent introduction from a Member State of the personal property of individuals (Codified version), published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 10.6.2009 L 145/36.




However, the scope of Directive 2009/55 excludes some of the taxes and duties most interesting to individuals:



Article 1
Scope

1. Every Member State shall, subject to the conditions and in the cases hereinafter set out, exempt personal property introduced permanently from another Member State by private individuals from consumption taxes which normally apply to such property.

2. The following shall not be covered by this Directive:

(a) value added tax;

(b) excise duty;

(c) specific and/or periodical duties and taxes connected with the use within the country of property referred to in paragraph 1, such as for instance motor vehicle registration fees, road taxes and television licences.


***

Regulation 2009/55 is based on Article 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), on harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation.


Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 6 June 2009

EU: Passport biometrics

According to Article 62(2)(a) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), the Council shall establish standards and procedures to be followed by the member states in carrying out checks on persons at the external borders. The so called co-decision procedure applies (Articles 67 and 251 TEC).


Existing provisions are found in Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States, , published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 29.12.2004 L 385/1.



Regulation 2252/2004 aimed at enhanced harmonised security standards for passports and travel documents to protect against falsification. At the same time biometric identifiers were integrated in the passport or travel document in order to establish a reliable link between the genuine holder and the document.

The Regulation concerning free movement of people is not applicable in Denmark, Ireland or the United Kingdom, but it applies to the Schengen area states Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, as well as Liechtenstein.


***


Amendments


Amendments are on their way. Although the provisions of the directly applicable Regulation are addressed to the EU member states, this is an example of EU legislation with direct consequences for ordinary citizens, who apply for passports for themselves and their under-age children.

Regulation (EC) No 444/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2009 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 6.6.2009 L 142/1.



According to the Regulation, passports are issued as individual documents, which means that children need their own passports.

In addition to a photo, the passport requires fingerprints. Because of difficulties getting reliable fingerprints of children, under 12 year olds are provisionally exempted, but existing national lower age limits of at least 6 years of age can continue for four years.

Additional technical specifications will be established for passports and travel documents in accordance with international standards, including in particular the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO).


Ralf Grahn

Wednesday, 20 May 2009

EU: Free movement Switzerland (Bulgaria & Romania)

The Swiss Confederation is the one EFTA country, which is not a member of the European Economic Area (EEA) ─ as are Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway ─ so closer relations with the European Union and its member states have been built gradually on the basis of bilateral (and plurilateral) agreements.

The Wikipedia overview article Switzerland and the European Union (latest update 19 May 2009) describes the Swiss Confederation as a virtual member of the EEA or even the EU. (Despite the so called Guillotine Clause, given the importance of referendums in the Swiss constitutional system, the “even the EU” could be seen as an exaggeration.)




***


Accession and free movement

From the point of view of the European Union, the extension of free movement to Switzerland with regard to the latest EU entrants Bulgaria and Romania is now confirmed by the official publication of the relevant documents.


Council Decision

The first document is the formal Council Decision 2009/392/EC of 27 November 2008 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community and its Member States, of a Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons regarding the participation, as contracting parties of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union, published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU) 20.5.2009 L 124/51.




***

Protocol

The second document is the Protocol to the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, regarding the participation, as contracting parties of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania pursuant to their accession to the European Union, published OJEU 20.5.2009 L 124/53.



The Protocol, to be ratified, contains the substantial provisions, including the transitional clauses (limitations).



Ralf Grahn

Thursday, 30 April 2009

New EU member states: Freer movement of workers

Tomorrow, 1 May 2009, five years have passed since the “big bang” enlargement of the European Union. The ten acceding member states were: Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. (Bulgaria and Romania became EU member states on 1 January 2007.)

One of the principal aims of the European Community (European Union) is to eliminate barriers which divide Europe. For these purposes the EC (EU) activities include an internal market characterised by the abolition, as between the member states, of obstacles to the free movement of goods, persons, services and capital.

In other words, the four fundamental market freedoms which relate to free movement are not restricted to goods, services and capital, but apply to human beings as well.

New developments

Denmark lifts all and Belgium some restrictions on the free movement of workers from 1 May 2009. See the Commission’s press release: European Commission welcomes the decisions by Belgium and Denmark to open their labour markets (29 April 2009).



For an overview of the transitional provisions concerning workers from you can turn to the web page Enlargement - transitional provisions and the links you find there.




Ralf Grahn

Friday, 17 April 2009

BBC’s free movement of EU labour map

The question of intra-EU free movement of persons is important for millions of EU citizens, especially those from the new member states.

The BBC offers a first aid kit for those who need information on existing restrictions. The public service broadcaster presents the matters in a readable fashion in its EU free movement of labour map (latest update 28 July 2008).


Read and enjoy before you buy your ticket.


Ralf Grahn

Thursday, 12 February 2009

Freedom to move and reside ─ UK style

Head of Legal in ‘Geert Wilders: and another thing …’ has commented:

http://headoflegal.blogspot.com/2009/02/geert-wilders-and-another-thing.html

So have many others on the UK Home Office’s refusal to let Dutch MP Geert Wilders into the country.

But a few more posts may be needed in order to get the member states and the Commission into active mode.

We are speaking about free movement of people, one of the cornerstones of the internal market, indeed the European Union.

We are speaking about the so called Citizenship Directive 2004/38/EC.

And we are speaking of the freedom of expression and information enshrined by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Charter the United Kingdom has not opted out of.

What does the Home Office do?

It declares a supposedly peaceful man ‘persona non grata’ as a risk for public security.

***

The right to move and reside freely is subject only to a few exceptions, and as exemptions they must be interpreted narrowly. Public policy, public security and public health cannot be defined unilaterally by governments to cover every facet of human life they happen to dislike. Otherwise there would be no rule of law, only arbitrariness. Sometimes one wonders at the ability of governments to undo themselves.

***

European competition

Without vigilant media and bloggers European governments would harm themselves far more often and far more seriously than presently.

But knowingly or unknowingly they disregard the rule of law all too often.

Perhaps a measure of the open method of coordination is called for(?) Benchmarking, best (worst) practice and the like.

Let me suggest that the UK Home Office on the freedom to move and reside and French President Nicolas Sarkozy on the virtues of the internal market constitute the benchmarks for incredible government action within an EU context for the rest of the year.

Let us compare later gaffes with these to see what we come up with during the rest of 2009. We live in interesting times.


Ralf Grahn