Showing posts with label SME. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SME. Show all posts

Thursday, 22 March 2012

EU action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs

The article Access to finance for small businesses – EU Single Market Act brought us to the SMA related Communication from the European Commission:

An action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs; Brussels, 7.12.2011 COM(2011) 870 final
(15 pages; available in 22 EU languages)

In a nutshell (page 1):

The Commission is presenting in this Action Plan the various policies that it is pursuing to make access to finance easier for Europe's 23 million SMEs and to provide a significant contribution to growth.

The Action Plan promises regulatory, financial and other measures to improve the access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).


SEC(2011) 1527

The action plan was accompanied by:

Commission staff working paper Accompanying the document An action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs; Brussels, 7.12.2011 SEC(2011) 1527 final (13 pages; only in English)

The paper discusses the conditions: SMEs' access to lending, venture capital and equity. It then presents EU financial measures for SMEs 2007-2013, before conveniently listing current and planned actions to improve access to finance.


Next steps

The Danish presidency of the EU Council has prepared a note on the follow-up to the recent meetings of the European Council (summits), including the growth agenda, where issues related to the single market are seen as top priorities:

European Council - Follow-up by the Council; Brussels, 19 March 2012 document 7824/12

Paragraph 3 on page 2 offers the following view:

3. The COMPET Council will report in May, as requested by the members of the European Council at their informal meeting of 30 January 2012, on implementation of measures to be taken at European level for boosting the access to finance for SMEs. In this context he COSME programme will be discussed at the May COMPET Council and work will be taken forward rapidly on the legislative proposal for the creation of a EU-wide venture capital regime (part of the twelve priority levers of the Single Market Act).

Here is some introductory information about the proposed Programme for Competitiveness of enterprises and SMEs (COSME) 2014-2020, with further links for those interested.



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. The multilingual Bloggingportal.eu already aggregates the posts from 944 Euroblogs. They represent an important part of the emerging European online public sphere, discussion across national and linguistic borders. In addition to its other activities, the economic think tank Bruegel runs the collective quality Bruegel blog, divided into thematic sections. Recommended reading.

Among the Euroblogs on Bloggingportal.eu you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), the Nordic Grahnblawg (written in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). I write and speak about democracy and openness in the European Union, but increasingly about the crucial challenges of the global era for Europe: growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making.

Wednesday, 21 March 2012

Access to finance for small businesses - EU Single Market Act

In the article Single Market Act COM(2011) 206 we looked at the twelve levers for growth and the key action for each.


Access to finance for SMEs

The first lever in the Single Market Act (SMA) (page 6-7) is Access to finance for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). One of the promises was:

SME financing will be the subject of an action plan. It will cover not only access to different financing sources but also SME financing tools directly and the creation of an environment that is conducive to development and growth for SMEs.


SMEs' access to finance

We fast-forward to 7 December 2011, when the DG Enterprise and Industry of the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) published the latest SMEs' Access to Finance Survey 2011: short summary and full analytical report.


Action plan for SME finance

On the same day the Commission published (MEMO/11/879) EU Action Plan: helping SMEs access more financial resources, which offers a quick overview of the proposed actions.

For more detail there is the communication from the Commission:

An action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs; Brussels, 7.12.2011 COM(2011) 870 final
(15 pages; available in 22 EU languages), as well as the

Commission staff working paper Accompanying the document An action plan to improve access to finance for SMEs; Brussels, 7.12.2011 SEC(2011) 1527 final



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. The multilingual Bloggingportal.eu already aggregates the posts from 943 Euroblogs. They represent an important part of the emerging European online public sphere, discussion across national and linguistic borders. One of the most promising fresh entrants is the LSE European Politics and Policy EUROPP blog, where Gareth Harding stated that the European Union is losing the battle for the hearts and minds of its citizens, but also handed out advice on how to turn the tide.

Among the Euroblogs on Bloggingportal.eu you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), the Nordic Grahnblawg (written in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). I write and speak about democracy and openness in the European Union, but increasingly about the crucial challenges of the global era for Europe: growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making.

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

EU: What is the Single Market Act? Preview by Barnier

On Europe Day, 9 May 2010, professor Mario Monti delivered his report on the internal market to the president of the European Commmission, José Manuel Barroso: A new strategy for the Single Market – At the service of Europe’s economy and society (107 pages).

On 17 June 2010 the European Council endorsed Monti’s report and called for concrete Single Market proposals from the Commission. The European Council promised to discuss the matter in December.



At the European Parliament, Barroso has referred to the report by Mario Monti and he has promised Commission proposals in October 2010 to deepen the internal market.



Single Market Act



On 16 September 2010 Michel Barnier, the Commissioner responsible for the Internal Market and Services, offered an outline of what the promised Single Market Act is going to be. Some of the remarks are specific to the forum, a conference on the Baltic Sea Strategy in Tallinn (Estonia), but most of the section on the Single Market Act is relevant to businesses, from large corporations to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Naturally they are important for politicians, public authorities and interest groups in the thirty nation strong European Economic Area (EEA) as well.

In his preview, Barnier was at pains to demonstrate that the Single Market Act will bring direct benefits to citizens of the EEA countries, too:



Services and e-commerce are important initiatives that have to be completed.

But I feel we have to go further.

I do not know if one can "fall in love with the Single Market", to quote the words of Jacques Delors.

But what I know is that the Single Market is there for the people; it was made for them and it must work to their benefit.

Students, workers or pensioners, consumers or public services users… Everyone experiences obstacles to the Single Market in everyday life. And then they wonder: "what's the point of all this, if it does not work when I need it?"

This is a very serious challenge that we face, and it needs an ambitious response. This response I propose to you today is the 'Single Market Act'. To save and consolidate our common economic and social space of life, and to fight against so many tendencies of protectionism and populism.

This Single Market Act will be a framework communication setting out what the Commission intends to do by 2012.

And what is expected of the other public authorities – meaning you.

I have never believed that Europe could be made by Brussels or some institutions in isolation. Europe is not an abstraction; it is everywhere, here in Tallinn as much as in Berlin or Madrid.

The EU has much more to offer to its people than institutions and rules: it is first and foremost about freedoms and opportunities.

This is the meaning of the Single Market Act.

The Single Market Act will put a strong focus on business and SMEs. SMEs make up 99% of businesses and employ 90% of the work force in Europe.

The Single Market Act will stress the urgency of improving the capacity to innovate of European companies – and I hope we will soon find a solution on patents; my aim is that the first European patent be granted in 2014.

We will also step up the fight against piracy and counterfeiting. These practices do not empower consumers, as some demagogues could make people believe. Quite on the opposite; they ultimately impoverish them by stopping innovation. Why would you take your time and money to create something for which you will not be rewarded?

It will propose ways to help businesses get easier financing. I think of helping out venture capital funds, creating regional stock exchanges for SMEs, and simplifying EU rules on public procurement.

More generally, the Single Market Act will attempt to reduce red tape especially – but not only – for cross-border activities, including in the field of taxation and standardisation policy.

We will act abroad to ensure that European companies get fair access to third country markets, especially public procurement procedures.

The other pillar of the SMA will be to show that Europe works for all citizens.

It will notably concern services of general interest, universal access to banking services or patients' rights to the provision of health services.

We will also ensure that consumers are not discriminated against simply because they do not live in the "right" country. Give them more efficient means of redress in case of cross-border abuse.

Finally, we will improve the free movement of workers by reforming the system of recognition of professional qualifications.

And – I know this is a major issue in the Baltic Sea region – we will try to improve the implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive. We must find the right balance between fundamental social rights and equally fundamental economic freedoms to provide services and set up a business in the EU.

Last but not least, the Single Market Act will be about making all stakeholders better informed: if citizens do not know their rights and if practitioners and national administrations do not enforce those rights, there is no point changing the rules in the first place.

This will in turn allow us to develop a clearer view of the malfunctioning in the single market. For that purpose, the Commission will be holding an annual Single Market Forum from 2011 onwards, which is a very good proposal of the European Parliament.

This will start with publishing a list of the "Top 20" of single-market related sources of dissatisfaction for citizens. That way, we can concentrate on what really matters to them and what national obstacles still are to be lifted.

And indeed what we are doing here today, is a kind of a Single market forum at the regional basis for the Nordic countries. I think it is extremely useful and I would like to thank you for this initiative.

As a conclusion, let me say that the Single Market is not all about economics, competition and market opening. It is also about building bridges based on human values, dialogue, understanding, living together – in several nations but in one Europe. A Europe that is united, but not uniform.

I want to listen and understand the challenges you face, especially in the regional context of the Baltic Sea. My services and I are fully committed and available to support you, and I am now eager to hear how we can further help.


Road ahead


The Single Market Act, promised during October 2010, is going to be a framework communication about actions by 2012. In addition to enterprises, the Commission clearly wants to bring tangible benefits to consumers in general and in cross-border situations, as well as mobile citizens.

Barnier’s list of Gordian knots is impressive, even if mentioned only as examples. However, only the Commission’s concrete proposals will reveal its reform ambitions, and the European Council the prospects for progress.

For now, Mario Monti’s report remains the main public source for the reasons behind and the scope for the coming proposals.




Ralf Grahn



P.S. Nowadays it is increasingly hard to find European enterprises, public authorities or interest groups without an active social media presence or a stake in European Union affairs. Politics, policies, economics and law at a European level are becoming more important in a globalising world, not less.

EU-related blogs are a significant aspect of the emerging European online public space. There are now 671 Euroblogs, or blogs related to European Union (and Council of Europe) affairs, listed on Bloggingportal.eu, the multilingual aggregator.



You can take a look at the stream of all new posts, or follow the editors’ choices on the front page. You can also subscribe to the streams (all or highlighted) and the newsletters (daily or weekly) without cost.



Bloggingportal.eu needs a few more voluntary editors for the daily tagging of posts according to subjects. Why not increase your understanding of European affairs, improve your language skills and do something useful by joining the team of editors?

Wednesday, 6 May 2009

European Union: Pinning high hopes on small businesses

Today the Commission launches the first European SME Week. In its press release European SME week to boost entrepreneurship in difficult times (6 May 2009; IP/09/704) the Commission pins high hopes on the small and medium-sized enterprises as drivers of growth and job creation.



The press release (including the links) ─ available in 22 languages ─ is valuable for those, who want a quick overview of the European Union’s activities to promote entrepreneurship.


Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 4 April 2009

EU media measures & consultation

The Commission’s Media Task Force has compiled an Inventory of measures affecting the media, covering the following policy areas:



1) Audiovisual and media policies
2) Communications policy
3) i2010
4) Research
5) Other policy files with potential media impact
6) Commissioner’s groups
7) Reference – Lisbon strategy, impact assessment

Policies affecting the media are spread over fifteen Directorates-General and Services, which makes the Inventory a valuable tool for everyone interested in EU level developments. The Inventory is updated until January 2009.


***

SME consultation

The European Commission’s (DG INFSO) Media Task Force has launched an online consultation "European publishing small and medium-sized enterprises in the digital era: technological and business innovation ", in order to carry out a thorough investigation of the current state of publishing SMEs, in particular the obstacles they face and future development possibilities.

This questionnaire is aimed at SMEs in the field of publishing: books, newspapers and magazines.





Ralf Grahn
:

Friday, 6 February 2009

State aid for SMEs

The European Commission has published a Handbook on Community state aid rules for SMEs, including temporary state aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis.

At this moment, the Handbook is available only in English, but translations are promised. The 42 page Handbook will be in demand among governments, business organisations and small and medium-sized companies struggling with the economic recession.

The state aid Handbook is available here:

http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/studies_reports/sme_handbook.pdf

Ralf Grahn

Monday, 19 January 2009

EU Law: Tourism

Should the same internal market rules (and others) apply to all businesses, or should certain sectors be singled out for special treatment in the European Union?

Tourism is now mentioned in the treaty, but without a legal base for specific action. The Lisbon Treaty would allow complementary action with regard to the tourism sector.



***




TEC


There is no Title on tourism and no specific legal base in the current Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC). Cf. the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJEU 29.12.2006 C 321 E.

Still, tourism is not completely forgotten. Article 3(1)(u) TEC lists ‘measures in the spheres of energy, civil protection and tourism’ among the activities of the European Community.



***

Constitutional Treaty

This is one of the rare instances, where the intergovernmental conference (IGC 2004) made a positive contribution to the Constitutional Treaty.

The IGC 2004 added a Section and an Article on tourism to the proposal by the European Convention. Article III-281 of the Constitution:

SECTION 4
TOURISM

Article III_281 Constitution

1. The Union shall complement the action of the Member States in the tourism sector, in particular by promoting the competitiveness of Union undertakings in that sector.

To that end, Union action shall be aimed at:

(a) encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector;

(b) promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice;

2. European laws or framework laws shall establish specific measures to complement actions within the Member States to achieve the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.


***


Original Lisbon Treaty (ToL)

Article 2, point 148 inserted a new Title XXI Tourism and a new Article 176b (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/89):

TOURISM

148) Title XXI shall be replaced by the following new Title and new Article 176 B:

‘TITLE XXI
TOURISM

Article 176 B

1. The Union shall complement the action of the Member States in the tourism sector, in particular by promoting the competitiveness of Union undertakings in that sector.

To that end, Union action shall be aimed at:

(a) encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector;

(b) promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice.

2. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish specific measures to complement actions within the Member States to achieve the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.’.


***


Renumbering the Treaty of Lisbon (ToL)

The Table of equivalences of the original Treaty of Lisbon tells us that the new Title XXI Tourism in the TFEU (ToL) was renumbered Title XXII Tourism in the consolidated version of the Lisbon Treaty.

Article 176b TFEU (ToL) was renumbered Article 195 TFEU in the consolidated version of the Lisbon Treaty (OJEU 17.12.2007 C 306/218).


***


Lisbon Treaty consolidated

Article 195 TFEU

The Lisbon Treaty adjusted the terminology of the Constitutional Treaty. Article 195 TFEU appears like this in the consolidated version of the Treaty of Lisbon (OJEU 9.5.2008 C 115/134):

TITLE XXII
TOURISM

Article 195 TFEU

1. The Union shall complement the action of the Member States in the tourism sector, in particular by promoting the competitiveness of Union undertakings in that sector.

To that end, Union action shall be aimed at:

(a) encouraging the creation of a favourable environment for the development of undertakings in this sector;

(b) promoting cooperation between the Member States, particularly by the exchange of good practice.

2. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish specific measures to complement actions within the Member States to achieve the objectives referred to in this Article, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

***

Competence

In the general classification of EU competence in different policy areas, tourism appears among the supporting, coordinating or supplementing actions in Article 6(d) TFEU.

With a legal base for tourism, complementing actions can be based squarely on the needs of the sector, instead of having to fit other grounds for action.


***

Tourism summary

The Commission’s Scadplus pages offer summaries of legislation in different areas of EU policy, but actions with effects on tourism have been undertaken in other areas. Therefore the web page Towards a stronger partnership for European Tourism is more general than these pages in general (last update 23 May 2006):

http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/n26107.htm


***

Commission activities

The Commission’s Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry offers an introductory page on tourism, with further links:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tourism/index_en.htm


The Commission reminds us that the tourism sector is dominated by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and that it accounts for 4% of the Community’s GDP, with about 2 million enterprises employing about 4% of the total labour force (representing approximately 8 million jobs). When the links to other sectors are taken into account, the contribution of tourism to GDP is estimated to be around 11% and it provides employment to more than 12% of the labour force (24 million jobs).


More detailed facts about tourism are presented in the Eurostat Tourism Statistics Pocketbook (2008):

http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page?_pageid=1073,46587259&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&p_product_code=KS-DS-08-001


Tourism: the European Community’s involvement in tourism is a web page offering a historic overview of EC activities (latest update 6 October 2008):

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tourism/further_reading/index_en.htm


Commission Communications on tourism are available here:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tourism/documentation/communications/index_en.htm



The practically minded would opt for the latest one. The October 2007 Agenda for a sustainable and competitive European Tourism, as well as links to conclusions the same autumn by the Council and the European Council. There are also detailed reactions to the European Tourism Policy from the European Parliament, available here:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tourism/documentation/communications/commission_communication_2007/index_en.htm

The Communication (Brussels, 19.10.2007 COM(2007) 621 final) applies the aims of sustainable development to the tourism sector.





Ralf Grahn

Sunday, 28 December 2008

EU procurement: Economic operators

The internal market rules of the European Community (European Union) require equal and objective treatment of potential bidders and actual tenderers in public procurement.

The treaty principles are set out in a more concrete manner in secondary legislation, here the Procurement Directive 2004/18/EC. We take a look at a basic Directive provision on economic operators, i.e. firms and individuals (potentially) participating in public contracts procedures.

The European Commission has shown interest in the opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to compete successfully in tender procedures. We add a few references for interested readers.


***

Article 4

The EC (EU) Classic Directive or Procurement Directive 2004/18/EC starts Title II Rules on public contracts, with Chapter I General provisions. Article 4 Economic operators concerns some aspects of equal treatment of tenderers from different member states:


TITLE II
RULES ON PUBLIC CONTRACTS

CHAPTER I
General provisions

Article 4
Economic operators

1. Candidates or tenderers who, under the law of the Member State in which they are established, are entitled to provide the relevant service, shall not be rejected solely on the ground that, under the law of the Member State in which the contract is awarded, they would be required to be either natural or legal persons.

However, in the case of public service and public works contracts as well as public supply contracts covering in addition services and/or siting and installation operations, legal persons may be required to indicate in the tender or the request to participate, the names and relevant professional qualifications of the staff to be responsible for the performance of the contract in question.

2. Groups of economic operators may submit tenders or put themselves forward as candidates. In order to submit a tender or a request to participate, these groups may not be required by the contracting authorities to assume a specific legal form; however, the group selected may be required to do so when it has been awarded the contract, to the extent that this change is necessary for the satisfactory performance of the contract.


***


Economic operator

We start by returning to the definition of economic operator.

Economic operator is a convenient term to cover the concepts of contractor, supplier and service provider, as described in Article 1(8):

8. The terms ‘contractor’, ‘supplier’ and ‘service provider’ mean any natural or legal person or public entity or group of such persons and/or bodies which offers on the market, respectively, the execution of works and/or a work, products or services.

The term ‘economic operator’ shall cover equally the concepts of contractor, supplier and service provider. It is used merely in the interest of simplification.

An economic operator who has submitted a tender shall be designated a ‘tenderer’. One which has sought an invitation to take part in a restricted or negotiated procedure or a competitive dialogue shall be designated a ‘candidate’.


***

Latest consolidation

The latest consolidated version of the Procurement Directive 2004/18/EC, found on Eur-Lex under legislation in force, is of 15 September 2008.


***

Equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency

We are reminded of the general rules concerning equal treatment of companies and individuals vying for business contracts and of transparent procedures, in Article 2 of the Procurement Directive 2004/18/EC:

Article 2
Principles of awarding contracts

Contracting authorities shall treat economic operators equally and non-discriminatorily and shall act in a transparent way.


***

Mutual recognition

Article 4(1) evokes the principle of mutual recognition. To require domestic qualifications in the awarding member states tends to favour domestic bidders at the expense of firms or individuals from other member states and consequently against the internal market principles of free movement.

The Community rules on mutual recognition of diplomas and professional qualifications apply.


***

Professional qualifications

Legal persons can be required to show that they have suitably qualified individuals, who can fulfil the contract.

The Community rules on mutual recognition of diplomas and professional qualifications apply.

Under Freedom of establishment, the Commission’s Guide to the Community rules on public works contracts (based on the old Directive 93/37/EEC) explains some of the treaty provisions on professional qualifications (page 2 to 3):

However, the taking-up and pursuit of certain self-employed activities may be conditional on complying with certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action justified by the general good, such as rules relating to organization, qualifications, professional ethics, supervision and liability. Such provisions may stipulate in particular that pursuit of a particular activity is restricted to holders of a diploma, certificate or other evidence of formal qualifications, to persons belonging to a professional body or to persons subject to particular rules or supervision, as the case may be.

Where the taking-up or pursuit of a specific activity is subject to such conditions in the host Member State, a national of another Member State intending to pursue that activity must in principle comply with them. It is for this reason that Article 57 provides that the Council is to issue directives for the mutual recognition of diplomas, certificates and other evidence of formal qualifications or, as the case may be, for the coordination of national provisions concerning the taking-up and pursuit of activities as self-employed persons.

It follows, however, from the Court’ s case-law that national measures liable to hinder or make less attractive the exercise of fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Treaty must fulfil four conditions: they must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner; they must be justified by imperative requirements in the general interest; they must be suitable for securing the attainment of the objective which they pursue; and they must not go beyond what is necessary in order to attain it.”


***

Joint bids

Article 4(2) allows companies to leave joint bids as groups. Only if necessary, can a group be demanded to assume a specific legal form.


The Commission’s Guide to the Community rules on public works contracts (based on the old Directive 93/37/EEC) explains how a group of companies can submit a tender without assuming a particular legal form. A successful group may be required to assume a certain legal form, indicated in advance (page 54):



6.4.3 Groups of contractors

Groups of contractors must be allowed to submit a tender or to negotiate without having to assume a particular legal form. However, a group may be required to assume a particular legal form if it is awarded the contract. In such a case, the contracting authority must have indicated beforehand, in the contract notice, the legal form required.


As was pointed out in connection with the definition of the contractor (point 1.2), the Court has stated that a company which has neither the intention nor the resources to carry out the works itself may participate in a procedure for the award of a public works contract. However, in order to prove that it has the required financial and economic standing and technical capability, it must establish that it actually has available to it the resources of the contractors by whom it intends to have the contract carried out and that those resources meet the requirements specified by the contracting authority.



***

SMEs: “Small Business Act” for Europe

Groups of contractors are important, because they offer small businesses opportunities to participate in joint bids for public contracts too large for them to handle on their own.

One of the ten principles of the “Small Business Act” for Europe is Principle V Adapt public policy tools to SME needs: facilitate SMEs’ participation in public procurement and better use State Aid possibilities for SMEs.



Source: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: “Think Small First” A “Small Business Act” for Europe (Brussels, 25.6.2008 COM(2008) 394 final).

The Member States committed to implement the SBA by adopting the Competitiveness Council Conclusions of 1 December 2008.

The SBA Action Plan, annexed to the Competitiveness Council Conclusions, focuses on short and medium-term measures to improve SMEs’ access to finance, to improve the regulatory environment and to enhance market access for SMEs. These priority measures are an integral part of the Commission’s response to alleviate the negative impact of economic and financial crisis on enterprises, especially SMEs.

The European Council on 11-12 December 2008 supported the full implementation of the Action Plan for the SBA adopted by the Competitiveness Council on 1 December 2008.


***

Code of Best Practice(s)

The European SBA refers to the Code of Best Practice. Readers interested in improving the opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises in public procurement are invited to look at the suggestions made by the Commission Staff Working Document: European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts (Brussels, 25.6.2008 SEC(2008) 2193).

You can look at the proposals directly or read the earlier blog posts with summaries.


Ralf Grahn

Friday, 26 December 2008

EU Law: Industry

Is industry a cuckoo among the policy areas of the European Community (European Union), laying its eggs in the nests of industrious builders of the internal market and sound competition rules?

Should the European Union have more or less industrial policy?

Take a look at what the current and future treaties say, before taking a dogmatic stand.

***


Article 157 TEC

Article 157 TEC (ex Article 130) is the result of difficult rounds of treaty negotiations between proponents of dirigisme and supporters of undistorted competition.

In addition, the contours of “industry” or “industrial policy” are less than clear, because a number of existing European Community (European Union) policies affect industrial enterprises: the internal market, the competition regime including state aid, research and development etc.

To the extent that we speak about a European level industrial policy, its aim would arguably have to seen in the context of global competition, aiming at adaptation to structural change.

An environment favourable to initiative has as its objective to promote entrepreneurship, a somewhat scarce European commodity.

From the beginning of 2005 small and medium-sized undertakings (enterprises) are defined according to Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ 20.5.2003 L 124/36).

The category of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is made up of enterprises which employ fewer than 250 persons and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million.

This environment favourable to initiative (entrepreneurship) and development should be encouraged aiming particularly at the SMEs, which constitute 99 per cent of the businesses in the European Union.

Cooperation between businesses can be encouraged by suitable (European) companies as well as information and partner search.

Innovation, research and technological development are other worthy causes, although covered by their own, more specific treaty provisions.

The Commission can act as a catalyst to consultation and cooperation between member states.

The horizontal nature of “industrial policy” is seen in paragraph 3.

Supporting action can be launched according to the co-decision procedure, after consulting the Economic and Social Committee (ESC).

The last subparagraph serves as a reminder of the delicate balancing acts, which have led to the current Article. Open market member states demanded clear guarantees that the industry Article 157 TEC would not become a back door to “colbertist” dilution of competition or harmonisation of provisions on tax or pay and other employee benefits.

Thus, this title shall not provide a basis for the introduction by the Community of any measure which could lead to a distortion of competition or contains tax provisions or provisions relating to the rights and interests of employed persons.


Here is the current Article 157 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), as published in the latest consolidated version of the treaties, OJ 29.12.2006 C 321 E/117–118:

TITLE XVI
INDUSTRY

Article 157 TEC

1. The Community and the Member States shall ensure that the conditions necessary for the competitiveness of the Community's industry exist.

For that purpose, in accordance with a system of open and competitive markets, their action shall be aimed at:

— speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes,

— encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Community, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings,

— encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings,

— fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development.

2. The Member States shall consult each other in liaison with the Commission and, where necessary, shall coordinate their action. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote such coordination.

3. The Community shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in paragraph 1 through the policies and activities it pursues under other provisions of this Treaty. The Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, may decide on specific measures in support of action taken in the Member States to achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 1.

This title shall not provide a basis for the introduction by the Community of any measure which could lead to a distortion of competition or contains tax provisions or provisions relating to the rights and interests of employed persons.



***


Original Lisbon Treaty (ToL)

Although the Treaty of Lisbon is unreadable on its own, it spells out how or if the current treaties are amended.

Sometimes there are no specific amendments, although most of the times one or more of the horizontal amendments apply.

Article 2, point 129 of the Lisbon Treaty amended Article 157 TEC (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/84):

INDUSTRY

129) Article 157 shall be amended as follows:

(a) at the end of paragraph 2, the following shall be added: ‘, in particular initiatives aiming at the establishment of guidelines and indicators, the organisation of exchange of best practice, and the preparation of the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation. The European Parliament shall be kept fully informed.’;

(b) in paragraph 3, first subparagraph, the following phrase shall be added at the end of the second sentence: ‘, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States’.


***


Renumbering ToL

The Table of equivalences of the original Treaty of Lisbon tells us that Title XVI first became Title XVI in the TFEU (ToL), but renumbered Title XVII Industry in the consolidated version.

Article 157 TEC initially became Article 157 TFEU (ToL) before the renumbering of the treaty made it into Article 173 TFEU in the consolidated version (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/217).


***


Lisbon Treaty consolidated

Article 173 TFEU

The Title and the Article have been renumbered. The customary (horizontal) replacement of the procedure referred to in Article 251 by the ordinary legislative procedure has been made and the Community has been replaced by the Union. The specific amendments have been inserted.
Article 173 TFEU appears like this in the consolidated version of the Treaty of Lisbon (OJ 9.5.2008 C 115/126):


TITLE XVII
INDUSTRY

Article 173 TFEU
(ex Article 157 TEC)

1. The Union and the Member States shall ensure that the conditions necessary for the competitiveness of the Union's industry exist.

For that purpose, in accordance with a system of open and competitive markets, their action shall be aimed at:

— speeding up the adjustment of industry to structural changes,

— encouraging an environment favourable to initiative and to the development of undertakings throughout the Union, particularly small and medium-sized undertakings,

— encouraging an environment favourable to cooperation between undertakings,

— fostering better exploitation of the industrial potential of policies of innovation, research and technological development.

2. The Member States shall consult each other in liaison with the Commission and, where necessary, shall coordinate their action. The Commission may take any useful initiative to promote such coordination, in particular initiatives aiming at the establishment of guidelines and indicators, the organisation of exchange of best practice, and the preparation of the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation. The European Parliament shall be kept fully informed.

3. The Union shall contribute to the achievement of the objectives set out in paragraph 1 through the policies and activities it pursues under other provisions of the Treaties. The European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and after consulting the Economic and Social Committee, may decide on specific measures in support of action taken in the Member States to achieve the objectives set out in paragraph 1, excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States.

This Title shall not provide a basis for the introduction by the Union of any measure which could lead to a distortion of competition or contains tax provisions or provisions relating to the rights and interests of employed persons.



***

Main changes

The main amendments are taken over from the Constitutional Treaty, the guidelines and indicators etc. from Article III-279(2).

The first five years of the Lisbon Strategy were a disappointment, but the re-launched Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Jobs offers at least the opportunity of a coherent policy framework for the Commission and the member states.

The powers of the European Community (European Union) are fairly weak, but the open method of coordination (OMC) is ‘institutionalised’ in the Treaty of Lisbon, and in the long run it may contribute to progress in the member states and the European Union at large.

Although supporting activities generally exclude harmonising measures (see below), the Lisbon Treaty adopts the style of the Constitutional Treaty to mention the exclusion of any harmonisation of laws and regulations of member states specifically in each provision. Here the Lisbon Treaty adopts the wording of Constitution Article III-279(3).


***

EU powers in general

The powers of the European Union are attributed or conferred by the member states through the treaties (including their aims). The Treaty of Lisbon makes an effort to present the different categories of competence (as they are modestly called) in a systematic manner.

The taxonomy of EU competence is set out in Article 2 TFEU. The three main or general categories are exclusive competence in 2(1), shared competence in 2(2) as well as supporting, coordinating or supplementing competences in 2(5), although the exact scope and arrangements are laid out in the various treaty provisions as stated in 2(6):

Article 2 TFEU

1. When the Treaties confer on the Union exclusive competence in a specific area, only the Union may legislate and adopt legally binding acts, the Member States being able to do so themselves only if so empowered by the Union or for the implementation of Union acts.

2. When the Treaties confer on the Union a competence shared with the Member States in a specific area, the Union and the Member States may legislate and adopt legally binding acts in that area. The Member States shall exercise their competence to the extent that the Union has not exercised its competence. The Member States shall again exercise their competence to the extent that the Union has decided to cease exercising its competence.

3. The Member States shall coordinate their economic and employment policies within arrangements as determined by this Treaty, which the Union shall have competence to provide.

4. The Union shall have competence, in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty on European Union, to define and implement a common foreign and security policy, including the progressive framing of a common defence policy.

5. In certain areas and under the conditions laid down in the Treaties, the Union shall have competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States, without thereby superseding their competence in these areas.

Legally binding acts of the Union adopted on the basis of the provisions of the Treaties relating to these areas shall not entail harmonisation of Member States' laws or regulations.

6. The scope of and arrangements for exercising the Union's competences shall be determined by the provisions of the Treaties relating to each area.



***

Article 3 TFEU: Exclusive competence

Because industry is at a cross-road of other aims and policies, with more distinct powers, we can mention the customs union and the common commercial policy as well as the competition rules among the areas of exclusive competence.

***

Article 4 TFEU: Shared competence

The internal market (outside the competition regime), as well as the transport and energy sectors are among the competences listed as shared in Article 4 TFEU. The area of research, technological development and space is mentioned specifically in paragraph 3:

Article 4 TFEU

1. The Union shall share competence with the Member States where the Treaties confer on it a competence which does not relate to the areas referred to in Articles 3 and 6.

2. Shared competence between the Union and the Member States applies in the following principal areas:

(a) internal market;

(b) social policy, for the aspects defined in this Treaty;

(c) economic, social and territorial cohesion;

(d) agriculture and fisheries, excluding the conservation of marine biological resources;

(e) environment;

(f) consumer protection;

(g) transport;

(h) trans-European networks;

(i) energy;

(j) area of freedom, security and justice;

(k) common safety concerns in public health matters, for the aspects defined in this Treaty.

3. In the areas of research, technological development and space, the Union shall have competence to carry out activities, in particular to define and implement programmes; however, the exercise of that competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs.

4. In the areas of development cooperation and humanitarian aid, the Union shall have competence to carry out activities and conduct a common policy; however, the exercise of that competence shall not result in Member States being prevented from exercising theirs.

***

Article 6 TFEU: Supporting competence

Article 6 TFEU mentions areas of action at European level, where the Union can support, coordinate or supplement member states’ actions. Industry is mentioned among them:

Article 6
The Union shall have competence to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States. The areas of such action shall, at European level, be:

(a) protection and improvement of human health;

(b) industry;

(c) culture;

(d) tourism;

(e) education, vocational training, youth and sport;

(f) civil protection;

(g) administrative cooperation.


***

Summary of legislation: Industry


On the Commission’s Scadplus web pages with summaries of legislation, the page Industry offers links to pages on general activities and actions concerning particular sectors of industry:

http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/s25002.htm

The approach is broad enough to include agriculture, fisheries and tourism among sectors of “industry” or at least the links, making the industry concept even more amorphous.

***

Commission activities

Commission activities and news can be approached through the web page Industrial policy of the Directorate-General Enterprise and Industry:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/enterprise_policy/industry/index_en.htm


Taking into account the political and rhetorical importance attributed to small and medium-sized enterprises, there is cause to mention the new European portal for SMEs:

http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sme/index_en.htm


The latest Commission decision on the Lisbon Growth and Jobs Strategy (16 December 2008, IP/08/1987) can be found here:

http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1987&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

The financial turmoil, the economic recession and the national stimulus packages affect both the Stability and Convergence Programmes and the Lisbon National Reform Programmes of the member states.


Ralf Grahn

Tuesday, 4 November 2008

Enterprise Europe Network

The Enterprise Europe Network (EEN) offers support and advice to businesses across Europe and its services are specifically designed for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Launched in 2008, the EEN offers concrete and effective solutions to entrepreneurs and companies in more than 40 countries, including the 27 EU member states, three EU candidate countries (Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey), members of the European Economic Area (EEA) and other participating third countries. The network operates through 600 local partners, in other words, several contact points in each country.

The web address of the EEN is:

http://www.enterprise-europe-network.ec.europa.eu/index_en.htm


Ralf Grahn

Monday, 3 November 2008

EU public procurement: Best practices for small business II

In the context of the Small Business Act for Europe, the European Commission suggested public contracting improvements in the Commission staff working document ‘European Code of Best Practices - Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’, Brussels, 25.6.2008 SEC(2008) 2193 (22 pages):

http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/sme_code_of_best_practices_en.pdf


In this second post on the European Code of Best Practices, we look at the rest of the proposals concerning public procurement.

***

Reasonable selection criteria and financial requirements

Selection criteria have to be relevant to the contract and proportionate to the task. Unreasonable demands limit the number of bidders.

Economic operators and groups of economic operators can prove their combined economic and financial standing and technical ability. This offers opportunities for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

Less taxing financial guarantees improve the participation of SMEs.

***

Red tape

‘Alleviating the administrative burden’ is the section where the Commission discusses how to cut some of the red tape posed by the Procurement Directive. If reasonably applied, the Directive would for instance require only the best bidder to present all the certificates demanded.

The purchasing authority could accept documentation already submitted in another recent tender process.

Short and simple forms and certificates would help SMEs to provide the relevant information to the contracting authorities in time.

***

Value for money

The Code of Best Practices underlines the option to award contracts, not on the lowest price, but to the economically most advantageous offer, where quality, technical merit, functional characteristics, running costs, cost-effectiveness, after-sales services etc., as well as life-cycle costs, could offer opportunities to innovative SMEs.

When contracting authorities define their needs in terms of performance and functional requirements, innovative SMEs may be better able to submit bids.

***

Sufficient time

Prior notices can help small and medium-sized companies to find partners for joint bidding.

***

Paying on time

Improved payment terms and practices are crucial for SMEs, which seldom have large reserves of liquidity.

***

By highlighting good practices from various member states, the Commission encourages the same kind of meritorious competition between regulatory systems as embedded in the open method of coordination.


Ralf Grahn

Saturday, 1 November 2008

EU public procurement: Best practices for small business I

What can the European Union and the national administrations do to open up public procurement to small businesses?

Improved possibilities for small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) would offer them growth potential, and more vigorous competition would lead to better use of taxpayers’ money when contracting for works, supplies and services.

***

Against the backdrop of the Small Business Act for Europe (see earlier post), the European Commission presents its suggestions in the Commission staff working document ‘European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’, Brussels, 25.6.2008 SEC(2008) 2193 (22 pages):

http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/sme_code_of_best_practices_en.pdf

***

Purposes

According to the Commission, the overall objective of the ‘European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’ is to allow Member States and their contracting authorities to fully exploit the potential of the Public Procurement Directives in order to ensure a level playing field for all economic operators wishing to participate in public tendering.

In other words, the Code of Best Practices sets out to answer what can be done within the boundaries of EU procurement legislation, by improving contracting authorities’ procurement culture.

Two purposes follow from this:

1) Guidance on how member states and their contracting authorities can apply the EC legal framework in a way which facilitates SMEs' participation in contract award procedures.

2) Positive national rules and practices that enhance SMEs' access to public contracts are highlighted.

The Code of Best Practices deals with a number of problem areas. The problems and solutions offer a good point of departure for ministerial guidance and improved practices among procurement entities.

At the same time, for small businesses intent on expansion into public contracts the document contains useful information on many aspects of public, as well as references to additional sources.

***

Contract size

Contracts are often too big for small and medium sized companies.

Contracts can be divided into lots, which take the capacity and the niche of small businesses into account.

Small enterprises may bid as a group, and contract authorities can draw attention to this possibility.

Framework agreements can be concluded with several economic operators, instead of just one big supplier.

Sub-contracting offers an alternative for small and medium sized enterprises, if the conditions are fair.

***

Information on business opportunities

E-procurement is one possibility to ensure quick, cheap and easy information on business opportunities to SMEs, but in some countries their features could be improved and central portals launched. Information in other Community languages would bring taxpayers added single market benefits.

SMEs can get advice and support from the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN).

The contract authorities have an obligation to give bidders feedback, which gives the companies the opportunity to improve their future bids.

***

Clear information

Training and guidance for contracting authorities should take account of the needs of small businesses for clear information.

There is a need to improve conferences, seminars, training sessions and helpdesk services, especially for SMEs.

***

We will look at the rest of the suggestions in a future blawg post.


Ralf Grahn

Friday, 31 October 2008

Small business and EU public procurement

Is it impossible for small companies to win public contracts? Public procurement is generally seen at least as a daunting task for smaller enterprises.

The Small Business Act for Europe was launched by the European Commission 25 June 2008 to lower the hurdles faced by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). The aim was neatly put by Commission president José Manuel Barroso: Less red tape and more red carpet.

As the Commission points out, during the last years 80 per cent of the new jobs in the European Union have been created in the 23 milion SMEs (each with less than 250 employees and a turnover of less than 50 million euro).

For a quick presentation of the Small Business Act (SBA), go to the press release “Think Small First”: A Small Business Act for Europe:

http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1003&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

***

Small Business Act

Officially, the document is the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “Think Small First” A “Small Business Act” for Europe , Brussels, 25.6.2008 COM(2008) 394 final:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0394:FIN:EN:PDF


***

The aim was to focus the Commission’s own activities and to infuse some small business thinking into the refounded Lisbon Growth and Jobs Strategy, before the member states conclude their next round of national Lisbon strategies.

The Commission calls the term Act symbolic. It could just as well be called misleading, since the SBA is primarily a political programme, with a modicum of related legislative proposals.

This is the wider context for the proposals concerning public contracts.

***

Public procurement proposals


Section V (page 10) encourages the European Union and the member states to make use of the Code of Best Practice providing guidance to contracting authorities on how they may apply the EC public procurement framework in a way which facilitates SMEs’ participation in public procurement procedures.

The Communication acknowledged the obstacles SMEs face when participating in public procurement markets, which account for16% of the EU gross domestic product (GDP). According to the Commission, further significant efforts are needed to reduce the remaining obstacles to SMEs accessing procurement markets, especially by alleviating requirements imposed by contracting authorities in award procedures.

***

Commission actions

The Commission promised to present a voluntary Code of Best Practice for contracting authorities, to trigger further change in the purchasing culture. It would provide guidance on how to reduce bureaucracy, improve transparency and information and ensure a level playing field for SMEs.

The Commission promised to further facilitate access to information on procurement opportunities by complementing the existing EU websites dedicated to public procurement with a series of initiatives such as optional publication of contract notices for below-threshold procurement, an online tool to find business partners, and increased transparency of public procurement requirements

***

Member states’ actions

Electronic procurement portals: The member states were ‘invited to’ set up electronic portals to widen access to information on public procurement opportunities below the EU thresholds.

Smaller lots: The member states could encourage their contracting authorities to subdivide contracts into lots where it is appropriate and to make sub-contracting opportunities more visible.

Reasonable demands: The Commission wanted the member states to remind their contracting authorities of their obligation to avoid disproportionate qualification and financial requirements.

Dialogue and training: The Commission also wanted to encourage constructive dialogue and mutual understanding between SMEs and large buyers through activities such as information, training, monitoring and exchange of good practice.

***


It is important for small businesses and their organisations to keep on the lookout for good practices in Europe, and to keep a watch on the laggards among the member states.

If you have good or deplorable examples of procurement practices in Europe, your comments are most welcome.



Ralf Grahn