Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Nations. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 June 2010

EU statement on Gaza flotilla

Yesterday, 31 May 2010, the EU high representative Catherine Ashton issued a statement on behalf of the EU on the Israeli military operation against the flotilla heading for Gaza, but seized by the Israeli Defense Forces:


The EU deeply regrets the loss of life during the Israeli military operation in international waters against the Flotilla sailing to Gaza and offers its condolences to the families of the victims. The EU condemns the use of violence that has produced a high number of victims among the members of the flotilla and demands an immediate, full and impartial inquiry into the events and the circumstances surrounding them.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza remains a source of grave concern. The EU does not accept the continued policy of closure. It is unacceptable and politically counterproductive. We need to urgently achieve a durable solution to the situation in Gaza.

The EU underlines its call for an immediate, sustained and unconditional opening of crossings for the flow of humanitarian aid, commercial goods and persons to and from Gaza.

The EU calls on Israel to urgently provide Member States with consular access to and information about their citizens.

The EU calls upon all parties and relevant actors to prevent a further escalation of tensions and underlines the need to continue the proximity talks with a view to the resumption of direct negotiations.



Open questions

The IDF has spread video footage of “pacifists” attacking Israeli commandos with cudgels and the like. The scenes are nasty and the consequences tragic, but who started the attack? Who gave Israel the authority to board and seize vessels on the high sea with military might? How would the state of Israel react to the attempted seizure of its own ships in international waters?

In my humble opinion, Ashton’s declaration leaves a number of additional questions open. These issues should be clarified as part of the ‘immediate, full and impartial inquiry into the events and the circumstances surrounding them’.

The EU regretted the loss of life, but did not deal with the legality of the military seizure of civilian (merchant) vessels, registered in NATO member states, in international waters.

The EU called the blockade of Gaza unacceptable and counterproductive, but it did not deal with the legality of the blockade on sea or land.

The EU did not question the legality of the seizure, transportation to Israel, detention and potential penalties of some 700 citizens from different countries.

The EU did not demand the immediate and unconditional release of the hijacked persons. (The EU only called for consular access and information, as each country would do if one of its citizens was caught in a foreign jurisdiction with a suitcase full of heroin.)



United Nations




The spiral of hate and violence is kept in motion by hotheads on various sides, but the United Nations offers an approximate view of reactions within the international community.



A note on the UN Security Council emergency meeting 31 May 2010 [update: new version published] presents available information about the boarding and offers an overview of UN positions as well as statements by state representatives.

As far as I could see, two countries condoned the sea blockade of Gaza: the United States (“delivery by sea was not appropriate”) and Israel (blockade and boarding legitimate).

Has Israel further undermined its long term security?




Ralf Grahn

Sunday, 20 January 2008

EU Treaty of Lisbon: International organisations and conferences

If the member states of the European Union (EU) want to shape world events effectively, they have to coordinate their actions in international organisations and at international conferences. This coordination encompasses both questions of substance and candidates for international posts.

The Security Council of the United Nations, where France and the United Kingdom – the only EU states with nuclear weapons – are permanent members, is a special case. Neither has shown any interest to give up its seat, its veto powers or its status as a (former) great power in favour of representation for the European Union, but at a practical level both have an interest to keep the other EU members on board in most questions.

Action in international organisations and at international conferences is one aspect of the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) of the EU in order to safeguard its values and promote its objectives.



***

The intergovernmental conference (IGC 2007) regaled us with this exquisite sample of stirring penmanship. See the Treaty of Lisbon (OJ 17.12.2007 C 306/29):


”38) Article 19 shall be amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 1, the words "the common positions" shall be replaced by "the Union's positions" in the first and second subparagraphs and the following sentence shall be added at the end of the first subparagraph: "The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall organise this coordination.";

(b) paragraph 2 shall be amended as follows:

(i) in the first subparagraph, the words "Without prejudice to paragraph 1 and Article 14(3)," shall be replaced by "In accordance with Article 11(3)," and the words "the latter" shall be replaced by "the other Member States and the High Representative";

(ii) in the second subparagraph, first sentence, the words "and the High Representative" shall be inserted after "the other Member States"; in the second sentence, the word "permanent" shall be deleted and the words "ensure the defence of the positions" shall be replaced by "defend the positions";

(iii) the following new third subparagraph shall be added:

"When the Union has defined a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security Council agenda, those Member States which sit on the Security Council shall request that the High Representative be invited to present the Union's position."

***

In the existing Treaty on European Union (TEU) Article 19 looks like this (latest consolidated version OJ 29.12.2006 C 321 E/18):

“Article 19

1. Member States shall coordinate their action in international organisations and at international
conferences. They shall uphold the common positions in such forums.

In international organisations and at international conferences where not all the Member States
participate, those which do take part shall uphold the common positions.

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1 and Article 14(3), Member States represented in international organisations or international conferences where not all the Member States participate shall keep the latter informed of any matter of common interest.

Member States which are also members of the United Nations Security Council will concert and
keep the other Member States fully informed. Member States which are permanent members of the Security Council will, in the execution of their functions, ensure the defence of the positions and the interests of the Union, without prejudice to their responsibilities under the provisions of the United Nations Charter.”

***

We now proceed towards a consolidated version of Article 19 TEU, by making the amendments according to the ’construction manual’. Here is the amended and consolidated Article:

Article 19

1. Member States shall coordinate their action in international organisations and at international
conferences. They shall uphold the Union’s positions in such forums. The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy shall organise this coordination.

In international organisations and at international conferences where not all the Member States
participate, those which do take part shall uphold the Union’s positions.

2. In accordance with Article 11(3), Member States represented in international
organisations or international conferences where not all the Member States participate shall
keep the other Member States and the High Representative informed of any matter of common interest.

Member States which are also members of the United Nations Security Council will concert and
keep the other Member States and the High Representative fully informed. Member States which are members of the Security Council will, in the execution of their functions, defend the positions and the interests of the Union, without prejudice to their responsibilities under the provisions of the United Nations Charter.

When the Union has defined a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security Council agenda, those Member States which sit on the Security Council shall request that the High Representative be invited to present the Union's position.




***

The European Convention proposed the following Article III-206 in the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (OJ 18.7.2003 C 169/68):

Article III-206

1. Member States shall coordinate their action in international organisations and at international conferences. They shall uphold the Union's positions in such fora. The Union Minister for Foreign Affairs shall organise this coordination.

In international organisations and at international conferences where not all the Member States participate, those which do take part shall uphold the Union's positions.

2. Without prejudice to paragraph 1 and Article III-198(3), Member States represented in international organisations or international conferences where not all the Member States participate shall keep the latter, as well as the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs, informed of any matter of common interest.

Member States which are also members of the United Nations Security Council shall concert and keep the other Member States and the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs fully informed. Member States which are members of the Security Council will, in the execution of their functions, defend the positions and the interests of the Union, without prejudice to their responsibilities under the provisions of the United Nations Charter.

When the Union has defined a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security Council agenda, those Member States which sit on the Security Council shall request that the
Union Minister for Foreign Affairs be asked to present the Union's position.

***

The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe actually signed by the member states had the following Article III-305 (OJ 16.12.2004 C 310/137):

Article III-305

1. Member States shall coordinate their action in international organisations and at international
conferences. They shall uphold the Union's positions in such fora. The Union Minister for
Foreign Affairs shall organise this coordination.

In international organisations and at international conferences where not all the Member States
participate, those which do take part shall uphold the Union's positions.

2. In accordance with Article I-16(2), Member States represented in international organisations or international conferences where not all the Member States participate shall keep the latter, as well as the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs, informed of any matter of common interest.

Member States which are also members of the United Nations Security Council shall concert and
keep the other Member States and the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs fully informed.
Member States which are members of the Security Council will, in the execution of their functions, defend the positions and the interests of the Union, without prejudice to their responsibilities under the United Nations Charter.

When the Union has defined a position on a subject which is on the United Nations Security Council agenda, those Member States which sit on the Security Council shall request that the Union Minister for Foreign Affairs be asked to present the Union's position.

***

As we see, the basic idea remains the same from the existing TEU, via the Convention and the Constitutional Treaty to the Lisbon Treaty, when Article 19 TEU is presented in a readable, consolidated form.

The role of the High Representative is highlighted, both as a recipient of information and as an organiser of the needed coordination between member states.

The real addition, since the Convention, is Article 19(2) TEU, the new third subparagraph, on the invitation to the High Representative to present the Union’s position (provided there is one).

The loser here, as in the common foreign and security policy in general, is the rotating presidency of the Council. No more memorable appearances in the name of ‘Europe’ on the world stage for the leader(s) of a member state, every fourteenth year or so. The enhanced role of the High Representative should contribute to more coordinated, coherent and consistent action by the EU at international forums.

Since the EU’s agreed CFSP values and objectives are praiseworthy, institutional innovations leading to improved delivery are welcome from a citizen’s standpoint.

***

Let it be said that the Treaty of Lisbon does not deprive the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council of their seats, or change the composition of the Security Council, which can not be done unilaterally by the European Union.

On the other hand, from an EU citizen’s point of view and in order to strengthen global governance, a permanent Security Council seat for the European Union would be an improvement.

The UN Security Council remains special, in that the members, the permanent ones constantly, are supposed to ‘concert’ first, and then to inform the rest. How much the practices evolve towards advance ‘concert’ within the Council remains to be seen.

***

Diplomatic cooperation will be next in turn.


Ralf Grahn

Thursday, 29 November 2007

Expensive peace operations

According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) the combined known costs of UN, EU and NATO peace missions reached the record level of $5.5 billion in 2006.

A lot of money, one could say. On the other hand, world military expenditure in 2006 was $1204 billion.

Thus, the grand total of these peace missions was 0.46 per cent of combined military expenditure last year.

Something to think about?


Ralf Grahn


Source:

SIPRI Yearbook 2007, Summary in English;
http://books.sipri.org/product_info?c_product_id=346