Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts
Showing posts with label communication. Show all posts

Sunday, 18 March 2012

EU trade ministers communicating ACTA

The trade ministers met in the EU Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) 16 March 2012 (agenda). According to the background note:

Under “any other business” the Council will be briefed on the situation regarding the signature and ratification of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA) between the EU and Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States.

ACTA is aimed at establishing an international framework for improving the enforcement of intellectual property right laws and creating improved international standards for actions against large-scale infringements of intellectual property. Negotiations were concluded in November 2010.

We know that few issues have engaged as many EU citizens as intensely as the anti-piracy treaty ACTA, so we want to share with the public what Mr Didier REYNDERS, Mr Ivo MARINOV, Mr Martin TLAPA, Ms Pia Olsen DYHR, Ms Anne Ruth HERKES, Mr Matti MAASIKAS, Mr Rory MONTGOMERY, Mr Ioannis DRIMOUSSIS, Mr Konstantinos PAPADOPOULOS, Mr Jaime GARCÍA-LEGAZ PONCE, Mr Pierre LELLOUCHE, Mr Ferdinando NELLI FEROCI, Ms Praxoula ANTONIADOU-KYRIACOU, Mr Daniels PAVĻUTS, Mr Egidijus MEILŪNAS, Mr Christian BRAUN, Mr Péter GYÖRKÖS, Mr Tonio FENECH, Mr Henk BLEKER, Mr Walter GRAHAMMER, Mr. Andrzej DYCHA, Mr Miguel MORAIS LEITÃO, Mr Mihnea MOTOC, Mr Rado GENORIO, Mr Peter JAVORČÍK, Mr Jan STORE, Ms Ewa BJÖRLING and Mr Norman LAMB were able to come up with together with the commissioner, Mr Karel DE GUCHT, in order to enlighten the people:

The Council took stock of the situation regarding the signature and ratification of the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA) between the EU and Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, Switzerland and the United States.

ACTA establishes an international framework for improving the enforcement of intellectual property right laws and creating improved international standards for actions against large-scale infringements of intellectual property. Negotiations were concluded in November 2010 and the agreement was signed by the EU and 22 member states in Tokyo on 26 January 2012.

On 22 February, the Commission decided to refer ACTA to the Court of Justice to verify its compatibility with the EU treaties and in particular with the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Quite enlightening!



Ralf Grahn
public speaker on EU affairs

P.S. The multilingual Bloggingportal.eu already aggregates the posts from 941 Euroblogs. They represent an important part of the emerging European online public space, discussion across national and linguistic borders. One of the most promising fresh entrants is the LSE European Politics and Policy EUROPP blog, where Ronny Patz recently wrote about the EU blogosphere and called for more specialists and academics to widen the debate closer to real life.

Among the Euroblogs on Bloggingportal.eu you find my current blog trio, Grahnlaw (recently ranked fourth among political blogs in Finland), the Nordic Grahnblawg (written in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (meaning European Law, in Finnish). I write and speak about democracy and openness in the European Union, but increasingly about the challenges of growth (EU2020) and the (digital) single market in the making.

Friday, 27 January 2012

A communication disaster called ACTA

During the negotiations of ACTA the participating states did their best to undermine public trust by secrecy and obstinate refusal to publish various documents (Techdirt). When the first batch of countries signed ACTA in October 2011, the EU Commission and Council ignored the occasion (Grahnlaw).

The going is still pretty wild on Twitter under the hashtag #ACTA after the new signing ceremony yesterday for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the United Mexican States, the Kingdom of Morocco, New Zealand, the Republic of Singapore, the Swiss Confederation and the United States of America.

The web pages of the European Parliament are accessible again. Actually it was ironic that Anonymous took down the EP pages (New Europe and European Voice), when ACTA was signed for the Council of the European Union and 22 member states (The Register).

How did the European Union inform about the signing?

DG Trade offers us a news archive with the latest items from the past two months – empty. Trade commissioner Karel De Gucht has nothing new on ACTA.

The signing of ACTA has not made it to the front page of the European External Action Service (EEAS), with the Delegation of the European Union to Japan equally dismal.

The Council of the European Union did not deem the ACTA signing in Tokyo worth a press release.

In other words, the EU Commission (DG Trade) and the Council have learnt nothing from their continuing communication disaster among internauts. As incompetent and insensitive as before, the EU institutions seem to act on the presumption that a majority in the European Parliament is (once more) going to do what the governments of the member states want it to do. Public trust is not essential.


Ralf Grahn


P.S. Follow events on Bloggingportal.eu, the multilingual aggregator of euroblogs.

Thursday, 1 December 2011

EU Ecofin set European Semester in motion

Ronny Patz has recently blogged about how EU institutions can helpfully interact with human beings, or continue to operate like a permanent diplomatic congress where solidarity between governments is paramount.

From a slightly different angle we can look at the quality of what the institutions communicate, with an Ecofin sample earlier and having a new stab at quality assessment below.


European Semester 2012

The EU Ecofin Council was going to do its part to set the European Semester in motion, by hearing the Commission present the Annual Growth Survey 2012 (AGS).

The EU institutions enlighten us through the Ecofin conclusions:

3129th Council meeting Economic and Financial Affairs; Brussels, 30 November 2011 (provisional version, 17683/11; 26 pages)

On pages 8-9 the Council brilliantly copy-pastes and paraphrases what it already said in the background note (quoted in my blog post).

After reiterating that in March, the European Council will assess implementation of country-specific recommendations made under the 2011 European Semester and will provide macroeconomic and fiscal guidance for 2012, comes the scoop for the patient reader:

To this end, the Council asked the Economic Policy Committee and the Economic and Financial Committee to prepare conclusions for the Council's meeting on 21 February, to be submitted to the European Council.

I believe that the Committees would have acted without public prodding, but after Ecofin's intervention I am sure that the next round of fiscal consolidation and growth reforms in the EU member states is going to turn out a resounding success.



Ralf Grahn

Monday, 16 May 2011

Citizens first: EU Council ignores the Treaty

In his blog post The schizophrenic Council, Ronny Patz saw the real face of the Council of the European Union as that of an EU institution

…that may have started to understand how 21st century PR works but that has not yet understood how 21st century democracy should look like.
Kudos to Reijo Kemppinen for presenting the Council view about restricted and privileged access to information.

However, Kemppinen's arguments miss the fundamental principles of equality of and equal attention to the citizens of the EU (Article 9 TEU), as well as the guiding values of a union 'in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen' (Article 1 TEU).

This is more than a bureaucratic slip.

The guiding principles are relevant to both the apples of access to documents and the oranges of running communication work of the EU Council (as well as the other EU institutions).

The fruits belong to the citizens of the European Union.



Ralf Grahn

Monday, 2 May 2011

”Wide ownership” of Europe 2020 strategy – and more intense

The European Union and the EU member states have programmes for competitiveness in and of Europe, but the Europe 2020 growth strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (EU2020) and the relaunch of the Single Market (through the Single Market Act SMA) need to develop much beyond ritualistic planning and reporting chores for a handful of EU and central government officials.


”Wide ownership”

At least, the spring meeting of the European Council 24 to 25 March 2011 (EUCO 10/11) paid lip service to the need to engage all stakeholders, but the summit silently dismissed the demand from the Committee of the Regions to create territorial growth pacts:

6. In implementing these policies, and in order to ensure wide ownership, close cooperation will be maintained with the European Parliament and other EU institutions and advisory bodies (ESC, CoR), with the full involvement of national parliaments, social partners, regions and other stakeholders.

Regarding the challenge from the CoR and support from the European Parliament and the Commission, see the blog post (in Swedish) 'Regionerna utmanar EU-rådet: Pakt och partnerskap för EU2020-strategin' and (in English) 'Europe 2020 strategy: Regions challenge central governments', published just before the ides of March.

Having thwarted the regional ambitions, what are the European Council, the Council (of ministers) and the EU member states going to do to create at least a sense of wider ownership, even if lacking empowerment?

How are they going to manifest their own ownership more intensely?

They make or break the reform strategies for competitiveness, but how often do we see signs of the EU2020 strategy and the SMA at the top of the political agenda in the member states?

How much of a wider debate do we notice?


Hungarian benchmark

At this point, I am far from convinced that the EU2020 strategy will prove to be a greater success than the lost decade of the Lisbon strategy, even if proactive reform policies are crucial for the prosperity and the public services of Europeans.

However, even in dire circumstances there are almost always pockets of excellence to be found.

The Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union communicated brilliantly about the informal meeting of research ministers on innovation challenges 11 to 13 April 2011.

Is the Council secretariat prepared to improve the Consilium web pages by including links to future informal ministerial meetings of the different Council configurations? Is the next presidency trio – Poland, Denmark and Cyprus (Wikipedia) - ready to equal or surpass the benchmark set by Hungary regarding the meeting of the ministers for research?

***

We have to find and to nurture pockets of excellence, necessary to promote and communicate both wider and more intense ownership of the Europe 2020 growth strategy and other reform programmes, such as the Single Market Act and the Small Business Act, based on the sustainable foundations of the Stability or Convergence Programmes.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. In French and English, La Quadrature du Net informs us about legal developments at EU and national level and advocates the rights and freedoms of citizens on the Internet. Highly recommended.

Sunday, 1 May 2011

Improving communication: Informal EU Council meetings

We have scouted in the direction of competitiveness, in EU programme terms the Europe 2020 growth strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (EU2020) and the relaunch of the Single Market (through the Single Market Act SMA).

This has now led us to ask if future Council presidencies will try to exceed the benchmark set by Hungary for an informal Council meeting and if communication on official and informal Council meetings could be better integrated.


Hungarian benchmark

I am impressed. The Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union showed the way by going well beyond the traditionally lousy communication standards for informal Council meetings.

The informal Competitiveness Council 11 to 13 April 2011, where research ministers discussed innovation, offered stakeholders, the media and the wider public a fairly detailed account of the meeting as well as the solid discussion paper Future Perfect.

Even if the ministerial discussions 'sub rosa' remained closed to the public, the well structured web page with the main press release brilliantly gave interested readers access to related news and pages, as well as relevant external websites and documents about research and technological development (RTD).

(We also found that the European Commission should do some technical repair work regarding the links to the Digital Agenda.)


Improving the Consilium website

As we have seen, the Consilium website offers us official conslusions, as here regarding the Competitiveness Council (internal market, industry, research and space).

Even if it still seems like a utopian dream to wish for one-stop thematic websites truly covering all the EU institutions, I wonder if the Council (Consilium) couldn't at least build a bridge to the rotating presidency by including the main press release (web page) reporting the outcome of each informal Council meeting.

This would offer a permanent reference to the presidency pages, otherwise easily missed. In turn, wider and more long term readership might inspire future Council presidencies to communicate more generously about the informal Council meetings they arrange, with the Hungarian innovation page as the benchmark 'pro tempore'.

Is the next trio – Poland, Denmark and Cyprus (Wikipedia) - ready to take up the challenge?



Ralf Grahn



P.S. Gergely Polner and Hajdú Márton give the Hungarian presidency of the EU Council a human face on the Kovács & Kováts blog. You can follow @polnerspox and @hajduspox on Twitter, too.

Friday, 29 April 2011

Hungarian EU Council presidency: Innovation (Future Perfect)

Third time lucky? Our third informal ministerial ”competitiveness” meeting arranged by the Hungarian EU Council presidency seems to unearth a rich vein of precious ore, especially for those who are interested in research, development and innovation (RDI).


Europe 2020 growth strategy

Competitiveness in and of Europe depends on growth-enhancing reforms in line with the Europe 2020 strategy (EU2020) for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth (although we still hope for updates) and the relaunch of the Single Market (link to all Single Market Act SMA language versions).


Informal Council meetings

Therefore, we looked at how the Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union communicated on relevant informal meetings of the Council. First, we searched for the press releases related to the 16 to 18 January 2011 meeting of employment ministers (Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affaris EPSCO). Then, we found richer and better structured pickings from the gathering of ministers for transport (Transport, Telecommunications and Energy TTE) on 7 and 8 February 2011.


Competitiveness Council

Our third informal meeting brings us into contact with the Competitiveness Council (internal market, industry, research and space). As usual, the related press releases on the Consilium website contain official Council conclusions.


Hungarian EU Council presidency

If we use the search functions on the Hungarian presidency page News and events, filtering down between 11 and 13 April 2011, as well as the Council formation Competitiveness (COMP), we find some interesting items.


Innovation (RDI)

The press release 'Ministerial debate on innovation reform' gives us an account of efforts to intensify European efforts in the areas of research, development and innovation (RDI), including the need to simplify the European research framework programme(s). The new member states in Central Europe lag far behind as recipients of EU research funding.

In the margin of the web page, we find a number of helpful links to additional resources, reminding us of the well structured and high quality web communications of the Swedish EU Council presidency in 2009.


Future Perfect

We find a solid introductory presentation of RDI policies in the European Union:

Future Perfect – Discussion Paper for the Informal Meeting of Ministers of Research (Competitiveness Council); Budapest – Gödöllö, Hungary, 12 April 2011 (45 pages)

Future Perfect contains four interesting chapters on the RDI challenges facing Europe:

1. Introduction
2. Research, development and innovation in the EU
3. New directions for EU research, development and innovation funding
4. The contribution and potential of Hungarian innovation

The aims of the discussion paper are presented like this:

The purpose of this document is to set out an agenda for discussion and to provide an overview of the most recent offi cial papers and draft reports concerning the fi elds of research, development and innovation in the EU. The four themes which have been identifi ed are:

• Unleashing Innovation
• Addressing the Grand Challenges
• Strengthening Europe’s Science Base
• Spreading Excellence

Future Perfect is highly recommended as an overview for everyone engaged in RDI issues in Europe.

***

We return to the informal EU meeting(s) of research and industry ministers in future blog entries.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. The Spanish journalist Macarena Rodríguez writes one of the top Euroblogs: La Oreja de Europa. Follow her on Twitter as well @MacarenaRG.

Saturday, 16 April 2011

EU publication update: Single Market Act in English, French and German

Yesterday morning, the final version of communication from the European Commission on the Single Market Act (SMA) COM(2011) 206 had not yet been posted in any language.

We can now bring the glass-half-full people some good news.


English

The final English version has now been posted on the EU's legal portal Eur-Lex, under preparatory documents. Search by year and number, if needed, but here is the link:

Single Market Act Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence "Working together to create new growth”; Brussels, 13.4.2011 COM(2011) 206 final (26 pages)


French

In the same manner, we now have the final French language version:

L'Acte pour le marché unique Douze leviers pour stimuler la croissance et renforcer la confiance "Ensemble pour une nouvelle croissance”; Bruxelles, le 13.4.2011 COM(2011) 206 final


German

We now have the communication in German, one of the three working languages of the Commission, and the version is designated as final:

Binnenmarktakte Zwölf Hebel zur Förderung von Wachstum und Vertrauen „Gemeinsam für neues Wachstum”; Brüssel, den 13.4.2011 KOM(2011) 206 endgültig


Glass-half-empty

Remembering the allegiance of sixteen EU member states to the motto 'United in diversity' (Lisbon Treaty declaration 52), it is fitting to offer something to the glass-half-empty crowd as well.

Although the three working languages of the Commission are now covered, we still have to wait for the communication COM(2011) 206 in twenty official EU languages, namely Bulgarian, Spanish, Czech, Danish, Estonian, Greek, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Hungarian, Maltese, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Finnish and Swedish.


Commission Staff Working Paper

In many cases Commission Staff Working Papers (SWP) are much lengthier than the communications. They are targeted mainly at officials and stakeholder representatives at EU level and in the national capitals, as well as researchers, teachers and students.

While the communications (the official proposals and main findings) are usually translated into 23 or 22 languages, i.a. in order to enable the national administrations and parliaments to deal with them, the SWPs are usually published in only one to three languages, often only in English.

Thus, I only checked to see that no French or German version was available, at least right now, before establishing that the accompanying SEC(2011) 467 has now been posted in English on Eur-Lex. Exceptionally, I'll give you the full name:

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER Overview of responses to the public consultation on the Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act’ Accompanying document to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A Single Market Act Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence "Working together to create new growth"; Brussels, 13.4.2011 SEC(2011) 467 final (32 pages)

***

In other words, we now have the SMA communication in English, French and German final versions, as well as the consultation summary SWP in English.



Ralf Grahn


P.S. On the Polscieu blog, Ronny Patz dissected the Brussels jungle in a sharp and entertaining post 'The Advanced User Polity or: Why the EU is like a primeval forest'. The blog platform Ideas on Europe is administered by UACES (the University Association for Contemporary European Studies). On Ideas on Europe you can find other interesting Euroblogs as well, written by academics, researchers and advanced students. (Why not start a blog there, if you fit the bill?)

Monday, 4 April 2011

European Council: Economic policy reform priorities III

Having looked at the Annual Growth Survey (AGS) from the Commission in Part One and EU 2020 macroeconomic and fiscal guidance offered by the Ecofin Council in Part Two, we turn to another submerged part of the iceberg, awkwardly acknowledged by the Europan Council, in footnote 1 to paragraph 2:

In line with the Council's conclusions of 15 February and 7 March 2011 and further to the Commission's Annual Growth Survey. See also the Presidency's synthesis report of 16 March 2011.

Source:

European Council 24/25 March 2011 Conclusions; Brussels, 25 March 2011 (EUCO 10/11; 34 pages)


EPSCO Council 7 March 2011

EPSO Council, I presume? (Cf Sir Henry Morton Stanley)

Only the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) seems to have convened on 7 March 2011.

Having identified the Council configuration, we head for its conclusions, by now available in 22 official EU languages; here English:

3073rd Council meeting Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs (Employment and Social Policy); Brussels, 7 March 2011 (Council document 7360/11)

See also Grahnlaw: EU Council (EPSCO): EU2020 and March European Council.

Although the EPSCO Council discussed European Council issues under several subheadings in the conclusions and in a number of separate documents, mentioned on the pages from 7 to 12, the first paragraph on page 7 gives us a rough indication of the meeting:

The Council held a policy debate on issues relevant to the annual growth survey (AGS) and to the European Semester, namely the joint employment report (JER) and guidelines for the employment policies of the member states, and on items linked to the Europe 2020 strategy, i.e. the "European platform against poverty and social exclusion" and the main messages of the report on the social dimension of the strategy. The results of this debate and the joint employment report are to be submitted to the European Council of 24/25 March as part of EPSCO's Council contribution.


Joint Employment Report

The Council adopted the Joint Employment Report (JER), required annually by the Treaty:

Joint Employment Report; Brussels, 8 March 2011 (as adopted by the Council (EPSCO) at its session on 7 March 2011) (Council document 7396/11; 26 pages)

See also Grahnlaw: EU Joint Employment Report (JER) heading for spring summit.


Employment policy guidance

Praiseworthy, as in the case of the JER, the link in the EPSCO general conclusions now leads to the final version of the document, as adopted by EPSCO on 7 March 2011:

The Joint Employment Report in the context of the Annual Growth Survey 2011: political guidance on employment policies - Council Conclusions; Brussels, 8 March 2011 (Council document 7397/11; 7 pages)

Worryingly, already the first evaluation of the Europe 2020 strategy indicated that the draft National Reform Programmes (NPR) collectively fell short of the EU2020 targets for a 75 per cent employment rate as well as for lifting 20 million people out of the risk of poverty and exclusion by 2020.


Employment guidelines

The employment guidelines for 2011, to be formally adopted soon after the European Council, will be substantially the same as in 2010. Actually they said in the 2010 guidelines that they wanted minimal changes until the end of 2014:

Proposal for a Council Decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States - General approach; Brussels, 2 March 2011 (Council document 6192/2/11 REV 2)

Interinstitutional File: 2011/0007 (CNS)

See also Grahnlaw Suomi Finland: EU employment policy guidelines 2011: How annual can you get? (includes link to the existing guidelines, Council decision 2010/707/EU)


Platform against poverty and social exclusion


The EPSCO Council adopted conclusions on the European platform against poverty and social exclusion (7434/1/11), establishing its position on the key elements of the Commission flagship initiative. Again we find that the offered link leads to the final version of the document, as adopted by the EPSCO Council on 7 March 2011:

The European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion: a European framework for social and territorial cohesion - Council Conclusions; Brussels, 9 March 2011 (Council document 7434/1/11 REV 1; 8 pages)

In addition, the EPSCO Council endorsed the opinion of the Social Protection Committee (SPC):

Contribution to the European Council (24-25 March 2011): - The European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion Flagship Initiative of the Europe 2020 Strategy = Opinion of the Social Protection Committee; Brussels, 15 February 2011 (Council document 6491/11; 5 pages)


Social dimension of EU2020

The EPSCO Council also endorsed the main messages of the report about the social dimension of the Europe 2020 strategy, drafted by the SPC:

Contribution to the European Council (24-25 March 2011): - Assessment of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy: 2011 report of the Social Protection Committee = Main messages of the report; Brussels, 18 February 2011 (Council document 6624/11; 4 pages)

The full report from which these main messages are drawn is:

SPC Assessment of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy (2011) - Full report; Brussels, 18 February 2011 (Council document 6624/11 ADD 1; 50 pages)


Comments

The European Council fails to make clear choices based on public proposals, leaves submitted documents without acknowledgement, avoids linking to relevant conclusions and documents, and does not even identify the important documents clearly. Low points for user-friendliness, as well as communication skills and motivation to engage citizens.

Three blog posts down, but we do not know for sure what the official EU institution called the European Council endorses and – more importantly – where it omits its support.

Management by osmosis?



Ralf Grahn



P.S. Advance voting starts in two days and polling day is only two weeks away, but well governed, competitive and fairly social Finland looks different. Suddenly, one out of five Finns want to make a mental return trip to the 1950's by voting for the True Finns. Helsingin Sanomat International tries to explain.

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

EU General Affairs Council (GAC) communication: Wrong, stupid and a missed opportunity

Yesterday I published two blog posts in Swedish regarding the upcoming meeting of the General Affairs Council (GAC) the same day, 21 February 2011. The first entry looked at how the advance material published centrally by the Council managed to enlighten and engage the public. My conclusion was that despite coordinating heavyweight issues, the governments seem to exclude the citizens of the European Union on purpose: EU-rådet för allmänna frågor 21 februari 2011: Bedrövlig förhandsinformation.

I wondered how long the Nordic ministers participating in the GAC meetings would tolerate such lousy information before revolting, so in the second post I took a closer look at how the governments in Sweden, Finland and Denmark informed domestically about the issues on the agenda of the General Affairs Council. Sadly, even the Nordic governments seemed to have missed the GAC as an opportunity to communicate in any meaningful way or to invite valuable contributions from the wider society: EU-rådet för allmänna frågor: Vad gör Norden?

In my view, the GAC could be an important stock-taking and engaging milestone on the road towards improved guidelines from the European Council summits.


GAC conclusions

If the advance information was lousy, how much did the GAC meeting improve matters with regard to economic coordination and progress?

We now have the press release from the Council, with the GAC conclusions:

3068th Council meeting General Affairs; Brussels, 21 February 2011 (Council document 6762/11; 8 pages)

With regard to the follow-up of the February European Council, we are informed that:

The Council took stock of the follow-up to be given to the European Council's meeting on 4 February, which [only officially; my addition] focused on energy and innovation.

Not a word, not a document about substance, how guidelines are put into practice or preparations advancing.

***

With the eurozone crisis, economic governance, the ”competitiveness pact” and the Europe 2020 growth reforms, the future of European Union citizens hangs in the balance at the the March European Council.

How does the General Affairs Council improve our knowledge and reassure us about progress being made towards needed reforms?

Here are the GAC conclusions:

The Council examined a draft annotated agenda for the European Council meeting to be held on 24 and 25 March, drawn up by the President of the European Council in cooperation with the presidency and the Commission (doc. 6231/11).

The March European Council is due to focus on:

Economic policy: Conclusion of the first phase of the European Semester (annual monitoring of budgetary policies and structural reforms), adoption of a decision amending the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with regard to the future European Stability Mechanism (ESM), finalisation of work on the ESM and on the strengthening of the European Financial Stability Facility, finalisation of work by the Council on legislative proposals on economic governance, and a decision on economic policy coordination in the euro area.

– Developments in the EU's southern neighbourhood and follow-up to the 4 February European Council declaration on Egypt.
Not a word, not a document indicating anything of substance, any indication of progress.

Does anyone find even a shred of new and valuable information compared with the already poor background note published before the GAC meeting or the old draft agenda?


GAC – missed opportunity

Despite the treaty based obligation to ensure a maximum of openness, the General Affairs Council and the European Council have, in tandem, adopted working habits and communication patterns designed to keep the public without any meaningful information about how crucial political issues are advancing.

Not only is this 'modus operandi' legally and morally wrong, it is stupid, counterproductive and a great opportunity missed to boot.



Ralf Grahn




P.S. What do Neelie Kroes, Andris Piebalgs, Maria Damanaki, Kristalina Georgieva and Cecilia Malmström have in common? They belong to the blogging minority among members of the European Commission. Kudos to them and to the Commission representation and services blogs you find behind the link.

P.S. 2: Political and macroeconomic guidelines emanating (or not) from the European Council and Council configurations at the top are important for our future, as are the questions of accountability and transparency from the viewpoint of EU citizens.

Details of internal market reform (Single Market Act) and the Europe 2020 strategy (EU2020 flagship initiatives) are going to be among my recurring themes as well.

On my Euroblogs I want to discuss legal and political issues relevant to European enterprises, jobs, employers and employees, consumers and citizens, especially in cross-border situations.

Hopefully my blogs succeed in educating and guiding readers towards relevant sources. For me the blogs offer continuous updating and disciplined study as basic training for my teaching and legal counseling activities.

My blogs are: Grahnlaw (in English), Grahnblawg (in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (in Finnish), as well as downstream the trilingual Grahnlaw Suomi Finland (usually later, with more sediment). On topic comments are most welcome.

If we share an interest in the European economy, business, politics or law, we could get acquainted through Twitter @RalfGrahn or Facebook.

Monday, 7 February 2011

Twitter discussion about the European Council #euco

The Grahnlaw blog post Busy week in Brussels: EU politics and governance (5 February 2011) looked at the General Affairs Council (GAC) and the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) preparing the ground for the European Council, as well as ”summit” preparations and materials.

European Council conclusions and Twitter (4 February 2011 meeting), on Grahnlaw Suomi Finland (6 February 2011), offered a short guide to the different editions and language versions of the conclusions from the ”summit”.


Twitter #euco

The blog post noted that there was some common ground under the Twitter hashtag #euco with messages from European leaders and reactions from journalists and EU citizens.

If the political leaders have not discussed much with citizens, @Dana_Council of the EU Council press office @EUCouncilPress has invited further discussion about the #euco hashtag.

Since then, we notice one of the important functions of Twitter put to use. Toute l'Europe has broadcasted its informative post about the results of the European Council (in French): Conseil européen : vers un marché unique de l'énergie en 2014.

The Bloggingportal.eu blog announces The Week in Bloggingportal: Where the hell is Ashton? The inactivity of the EU high representative Ashton was cruelly contrasted with the blogging and tweeting activities of Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt.

We see the importance of perceptions, partly created through social media use – blogs, Facebook and Twitter – although in Ashton's case lack of drive and weak language equaled her feeble media presence.

@eDiplomat promises a briefing by Richard Werly on EU diplomatic challenges in 2011. At this stage we have an announcement, but nothing wrong with that. Somehow news has to get around, and Twitter is an effective means.

My own blog post in Swedish highlights existing strategic reports (Europe 2030 and Mario Monti), now available in all official languages, paints a background picture and describes how the proposals have been received. Here success or failure for us Europeans will be determined at European Council #euco level.

As I see it, the #euco hashtag can be put to various good uses, as long as the tweets deal with the strategic level the 29 characters of the European Council are supposed to act on (impetus for EU development, political directions and priorities), within the limits of 140 characters.

Lengthier arguments and discussions have to take place elswhere, such as on blogs, but announcements, short reactions and discussions are possible on Twitter, if the interest is there.

Perhaps communication and social media experts want to add their wiser remarks, while we are waiting for Godot to make his appearance in the form of discussion by and with the European leaders.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. In addition to The Week in Bloggingportal, the Bloggingportal.eu blog has a new feature: The Month in Bloggingportal. The multilingual aggregator Bloggingportal.eu brings you the posts from 738 Euroblogs, part of an emerging European public online space. Keep up to date and improve your language skills!

P.S. 2: My Euroblogs aim to discuss legal and political issues relevant to European enterprises, jobs, employers and employees, consumers and citizens, especially in cross-border situations. Internal market reform (Single Market Act) and the Europe 2020 strategy (EU2020 flagship initiatives) are going to be among the main themes. Hopefully my blogs educate and guide towards relevant sources, and I remain open to suggestions. For me the blogs offer disciplined study as basic training for teaching and legal counseling. My blogs are: upstream Grahnlaw (in English), Grahnblawg (in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (in Finnish), as well as usually downstream the trilingual Grahnlaw Suomi Finland. If you are interested in European business, politics or law, we can get acquainted through Twitter @RalfGrahn or Facebook.

Saturday, 29 January 2011

An energetic and innovative European Council?

The European Council has a rendezvous with energy and innovation 4 February 2011 in Brussels, but can we expect the institution to become energetic and innovative? The meeting web page only reiterates the information contained in the annotated draft agenda, dated 7 December 2010, without offering added wisdom (Council document 17163/10).

Before the European Council, the Foreign Affairs Council (FAC) and the coordinating General Affairs Council (GAC) are going to meet, both Monday 31 January 2011.

Let us take a look at the quality of the advance information for the coordinating GAC meeting.


GAC background

The background note prepared by the Council press office for the General Affairs Council 31 January 2011 offers a summary on the first page and more detail on the following three pages.

The draft conclusions for the European Council are kept under wraps, but the texts tells us something about the items to be discussed.

Much real world interest hangs on the eurozone, but here little is on offer.

However, if the Council had wanted to be really service minded, it could have provided journalists and other interested people with direct and clear references and links to perhaps ten or twelve of the relevant documents.

Some things are better done once centrally, than hundreds of times in a dispersed manner.


Hungarian Council presidency

The Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union offers a brief page with the main items of the General Affairs Council.

In addition, the GAC page links to related news and pages, such as a description of the GAC and the priorities of the Hungarian presidency, the recent meeting of ministers and state secretaries for EU affairs, the launch of the first ”European Semester” for synchronised economic policy coordination, the development of European Roma policy and the strategy for the Danube Region (with further links leading to the communication from the Commission COM(2010) 715 final). Of course, it might be a good idea to link to the Eur-Lex page with all the available language versions.

There is a link to a GAC agenda dated 27 January 2011 and to the Council background note I mentioned earlier.

On the whole, the Hungarian presidency presents the advance information in a structured and fairly detailed manner, although using generic texts. Until now the General Affairs Council has been treated as a step-child, so this is still pretty good in comparison. Better presentation and preparation at the GAC stage should improve communication (including reception) at the European Council meeting, although energetic and innovative may be a lot to ask for.



Ralf Grahn


P.S. Do you think that there are differences between how Members of the European Parliament and domestic politicians use the web? Fleishman-Hillard's second European Parliament Digital Trends Survey reports on MEPs. You can discuss #epdigitrends on Twitter.

P.S. 2: I am happy if you want to read my blogs. The internal market and the Europe 2020 strategy (flagship initiatives) are going to be among the main themes on Grahnlaw (in English), Grahnblawg (in Swedish) and Eurooppaoikeus (in Finnish), as well as the trilingual Grahnlaw Suomi Finland. We can get acquainted on Facebook and on Twitter @RalfGrahn, too.

Sunday, 16 January 2011

Hungarian EU Council presidency: PR or credibility?

The Belgian presidency of the Council of the European Union showed team spirit by using the hashtag #EuTrioBe on Twitter. Now use #EuTrioHu and you find tweets from private EU citizens, media and even the Belgian presidency, but no communication from the Hungarian government.

The pattern is the same as we saw in yesterday's blog post: Hungarian EU Council presidency: Small but telling signs? (15 January 2011). Belgium www.eutrio.be handed over to www.eutrio.hu but we land at old school www.eu2011.hu. On the presidency web pages only the hungarian part of the eutrio logo is used.

Pure coincidence?

The Hungarian EU Council presidency now finds it opportune to tell us about its precedence-setting cooperation with the two other members of the trio:

During the term of the Hungarian Presidency, the Secretaries of State representing the Spanish-Belgian-Hungarian Presidency Trio will continue their excellent cooperation, announced the joint press conference by Enikő Győri, Olivier Chastel and Diego López Garrido in Budapest. The three countries’ cooperation is setting a precedent in the EU.

On a scale between convincing and a hollow ring, where do you place this self-proclaimed truth?

Even in the Hungarian government's press release, the coded language of the the Belgian secretary of state for EU affairs, Olivier Chastel, seems to convey a message to the attentive reader, as he diplomatically:

… spoke highly of the Hungarian Presidency’s programme and the institution of the Trio Presidency. He stressed that the three Presidency’s successes are merged and shared by the three respective countries.

Why do the PR efforts of the Hungarian government remind me of what Hugh Barton-Smith wrote about EU communication on the website of the Belgian chapter of the International Association of Business Communicators (IABC), in: Can Web 2.0 help save the EU from itself? (4 January 2011):

EU messages tend to be Panglossian in register, which only encourages scepticism.

However, this is where Web 2.0 can be useful. The euro blogo/twitter/facebook sphere is a resonance chamber for sufficiently switched on EU institution actors to assess just how hollow their words can sound.

And whereas most institutional communicators are paid/indoctrinated into falling over each other to find soaring epithets for his new clothes, the bloggers and twitterers can act like the lad pointing out the nakedness of the Emperor.

What would you tell the Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union?



Ralf Grahn



P.S. Treffpunkt Europa, the German webzine of the young European federalists (JEF), is back online with a new layout and continued discussion about the future of Europe, like its siblings, Le Taurillon in French, The New Federalist in English and Eurobull in Italian. Recommended reading for every EU citizen.



P.S. 2: After a few years discussing the EU on forums and blogs in Swedish and Finnish, I began blogging on Grahnlaw (in English). Today's Grahnlaw post is number 1,950, so there is a fairly solid archive by now on EU law and politics.

Tuesday, 28 December 2010

Liechtenstein under EU pressure on taxation

Yesterday I wished for public EU information to be more readily available and specific about the remaining issues regarding the common travel area: Liechtenstein heading for Schengen area (27 December 2010).

In the blog post 'What does the EU want from Liechtenstein?' (25 December 2010) we noticed how central EU aims in tax matters are with regard to the Principality:

Council conclusions on EU relations with EFTA countries; 3060th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010

The General Affairs Council (GAC) dedicated three and a half out of eight paragraphs to issues regarding taxation and relevant to the financial services industry in the Principality of Liechtenstein:

21. With regard to cooperation and information exchange in tax matters and the fight against fraud and tax evasion and any other illegal activity to the detriment of the financial interests of the parties, the Council welcomes the commitments taken by the Principality to implement OECD standards on transparency and on tax information exchange and to fight against fraud, and calls on Liechtenstein to continue its efforts in this area. The Council expects a quick and consistent implementation of these commitments in the relationship between Liechtenstein and the EU and all its Member States.

22. Concerning the taxation of savings, the Council welcomes the openness of Liechtenstein to launch negotiations on a revision of the savings taxation agreement to reflect the evolution of the corresponding EU acquis, once the EU has agreed the final text for its review of the savings taxation directive.

23. Considering that the EFTA Surveillance Authority has taken in recent years several decisions relating to state aid granted by Liechtenstein, the Council reiterates its recommendation of 2008 that Liechtenstein assesses all measures applied to industry, services and trade with respect to the definition of state aid provided for in the EEA Agreement, particularly in finance. The Council welcomes the intention of Liechtenstein to reform its tax legislation and looks forward to a reform compatible with state aid legislation. The Council will closely follow the implementation of this reform.

24. With regard to harmful tax practices, the Council encourages the Principality to continue discussions with the EU on the application of the principles and criteria of the EU Code of Conduct on business taxation.

Taxation and banking

I would have hoped for complementing quality information from the Council about the EU's aims regarding more controversial issues, such as cooperation against fraud and tax evasion, the revision of the savings tax agreement, state aid reform and curtailing harmful tax practices.

The European Union needs to take a more open attitude towards specifying the problems (as it sees them), defining its objectives and publishing reports on progress (or lack of it) in negotiations.

We can also hope for the EU's counterparts, in this case the Principality of Liechtenstein, to present their positions and arguments transparently.


DG Taxation and Customs Union

I have to admit that I found the web pages of the Commission service Taxation and Customs Union disappointing, because they did not offered clear thematic pages, country pages or search options.

The DG seemed to leave visitors only crumbs to pick here and there.

The first option is to go back to the annual report, almost a year old, but offering a background view:

Activities of the European Union (EU) in the tax field in 2009

The very first sentence of the report highlighted the aspirations of the EU with regard to Liechtenstein, and concrete issues concerning the Principality are mentioned in many places in the 30 page report:

Widespread tax evasion through the use of Liechtenstein foundations which came to light at the beginning of 2008 once again demonstrated the importance of international cooperation in the area of savings taxation.

With regard to fresher information, the only option seemed to be to trundle through the press releases published in 2010, but at headline level I found nothing relevant.

For those with a wish for a forward view commissioner Algirdas Šemeta spoke about the Commission Work Programme 2011 (CWP 2011) to the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee of the European Parliament 30 November 2010.

Among other things, commissioner Šemeta said:

… I am working closely with the forthcoming Hungarian presidency to identify how to progress on the savings directive and on the anti-fraud agreements with third countries.

Third, as you know, I am convinced that we have to maintain our efforts in the fight against harmful tax competition both within the EU and with our international partners. We entered in constructive discussions with Switzerland and Liechtenstein on how to extend the principles of the Code of Conduct to those two "third" but "close" countries. I also plan to discuss the future of the Code of Conduct itself with the Member States during the next meeting of the Tax Policy Group.


Council: Tax policy

The Council offers a web page with links concerning Tax policy (Taxation of Savings Income), with links to Liechtenstein, but I have found no quality overview regarding tax discussions with the Principality.

All in all, the information from the Commission and the Council about taxation pressure on Liechtenstein comes in bits and pieces rather than in a comprehensive and user-friendly manner.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. On Se former à la communication européenne, or a bit easier Lacomeuropéenne, Michael Malherbe dissects the communication activities of the EU institutions as an expert engaged for citizens and consumers. His most recent blog post was a review of European communication in 2010.

Friday, 24 December 2010

EU communication on EEA and EFTA member Liechtenstein

Our first look at Liechtenstein was the blog post 'EU relations with Liechtenstein (general conclusions)' (22 December 2010), presenting the general remarks including Liechtenstein, but addressed at the EEA or EFTA states as a whole. Then we changed to a Liechtensteinian perspective in 'Principality of Liechtenstein views the European Union' (23 December 2010).

This blog entry tries to look at what a European citizen readily finds about the relations with Liechtenstein on the websites of the EU institutions.

In the background we have the conclusions from the General Affairs Council (GAC):

Council conclusions on EU relations with EFTA countries; 3060th GENERAL AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 14 December 2010


EU materials (EEAS)

Naturally we have to test the newly launched European External Action Service (EEAS) and its recently designed web pages. What can we say about the communication efforts?

I am happy to see that the country page for the Principality of Liechtenstein on the European External Action Service (EEAS) website offers a succinct text about relevant topics. It manges to cram a lot of information and even some forward-looking elements into ten short lines, with links to other pages.

The news links have been updated with the GAC conclusions. There are also 'related links' to websites specific to Liechtenstein (relations).

Among the links in the text, one leads to a page on the European Economic Area (EEA), with a basic description and links to the latest news.

Another text link leads to a fairly comprehensive summary about the Schengen area and cooperation, but not updated since 3 August 2009.

There is also a link to the 2004 agreement with Liechtenstein on taxation of savings.


Liechtenstein treaties

The EU Treaties Office database offers 67 treaties between the European Union and Liechtenstein. Regarding Schengen and the free movement of persons some agreements are not yet in force.


EU delegation to Switzerland and Liechtenstein

Although general news on the front page are posted in English, the web page of the EU delegation for Switzerland and Liechtenstein you land on is in German: Delegation für die Schweiz und Liechtenstein.

In addition to German there are pages in French and Italian, but mainly for Switzerland where these are official languages.

You can find a link to the GAC conclusions on relations with the EFTA members, but only if you look for older news (where the language changes to German). I would expect the EU representations to post these conclusions visibly and permanently on the front page in Iceland, Norway and Switzerland-Liechtenstein.

There is a thematic page (in German): Das Fürstentum Liechtenstein und die EU. The page includes a link to the Europe Day celebration speech by the head of government, Dr Klaus Tschütscher, in Vaduz (11 May 2010).

On the Liechtenstein page I would have hoped for more information about how Schengen implementation advances as well as current aims of the European Union and issues in other policy areas.

Ideally, the new text should offer quality information on the issues the GAC conclusions dealt with in general and sometimes vague terms.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. While the EU institutions still seem to be sleepwalking, Jean Quatremer on Coulisses de Bruxelles takes a stand against the actions by the Fidesz government in Hungary to quell free speech and fundamental freedoms.

Prime minister Viktor Orbán is one of the vice-presidents of the European People's party, so the EPP has a special responsibility to act quickly and decisively to safeguard the founding values of the European Union and protect its own image.

Thursday, 25 November 2010

Thanksgiving

This Thursday, 25 November 2010, is Thanksgiving Day in the United States, a national holiday.

Often enough I have criticised the Commission's lack of leadership and dedicated communication with regard to its grand Europe 2020 (EU2020) growth strategy.

Let this Thanksgiving be the day I trumpet that, perhaps two weeks ago, the Commission finally launched a collection of web pages worthy of the role of Europe 2020 in its planned activities.

Let us hope that the Commission will keep updating and integrating the new materials from ”Brussels” and the member states.

EU2020 is what we have, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness or in health, to love and to cherish 'till 2020.



Ralf Grahn



P.S. Norway remains as resolutely outside the European Union as it stays inside the European Economic Area (EEA). Written by a number of journalists, Europabloggen.no follows EU events through Norwegian eyes. Recommended reading.

Tuesday, 19 October 2010

Europe 2020 strategy leadership and communication: State of the art or lying in state?

The seven flagship initiatives promised by the European Commission under the Europe 2020 (EU2020) strategy were Innovation Union, Youth on the move, A digital agenda for Europe, Resource efficient Europe, An industrial policy for the globalisation era, An agenda for new skills and jobs, and a European platform against poverty. See the blog post: Europe 2020 strategy: Barroso’s reform flotilla (flagship initiatives) (20 June 2010).

During October we have looked at some aspects of the Commission’s grand strategy. For context and your convenience, here they are:



EU: From Monti report to Single Market Act (2 October 2010) [There are other blog posts on the promised internal market reforms – a crucial element - if you are interested.]



EU: “European Semester” towards economic stability and growth? (3 October 2010)



Europe 2020 website: From deplorable to absolute disgrace (4 October 2010)



Europe 2020 Press pack: Better, but still shotgun approach (5 October 2010)



Europe 2020 strategy: Innovation Union (7 October 2010)



Europe 2020 web page(s)



Naturally, we have to make a mandatory stop at the central web page(s) for the Europe 2020 strategy to see if the Commission as a body has taken ownership of its make or break strategy.

Even if we are told that the one short web page was last updated 15 July 2010, a few discreet links have been inserted in the margin.



The 19 July 2010 press release IP/10/966 was there before: €6.4 billion for smart growth and jobs – Europe’s biggest ever investment in research and innovation


News links


Under News, a link to a press release has made its appearance: Youth on the Move – strengthening support to Europe’s young people (15 September 2010, IP/10/1124).



There is also a new link to the press release: The “Innovation Union” – turning ideas into jobs, green growth and social progress (6 October 2010, IP/10/1288).



In the ´plus column´ we can chalk up that the press releases are available in all the official languages, while the defining project for the Commission’s five year term (and the rest of the decade) offers the central web page only in English, French and German.


Document links

Under Documents, we find an unobtrusive link to the Communication from the Commission (although the pdf document did not open when I used the Google Chrome browser, but did when I switched to Internet Explorer):



Youth on the Move - An initiative to unleash the potential of young people to achieve smart, sustainable and inclusive growth in the European Union; 15 September 2010 COM(2010) 477 final (“print” version with pictures, 26 pages in all)


Under Documents, we also find an unpretentious link to another Communication from the Commission (opening with Google Chrome):



Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union; 6.10.2010 COM(2010) 546 final (no frills version, 44 pages)

For both flagship initiatives you find references to the accompanying SEC documents.


Digital Agenda and other flagship initiatives

The latest explicit links to the Digital Agenda, the flagship initiative first launched, seem to be from 19 May 2010.

There is nothing in express works words about the flagships soon to be launched, nor on activities in the member states (at central, regional or local level).



EU2020 Press pack



The Europe 2020 strategy Press pack has been enriched by a few disjointed press releases and speeches, valuable as such, but far from putting things into perspective as regards the EU2020 strategy as a whole.



Assessment


There have been improvements in the margins – literally – through the links under News and Documents, but Barroso’s reform flotilla seems to lack an Admiral to set the course and Head Communicator to steer, by creating a sense of purpose internally and by conveying the message to the member states and EU citizens. There is, of course, nothing inviting discussion and interaction.

Individually, the Captains (Commissioners) of the different ships – “Digital”, “Youth” and “Innovation” – steer their own course. They show leadership and communication skills. They are pioneers in the use of social media among the Commission services. Their itineraries have to be traced one by one, however.



Nothing can, however, compensate for the lack of overall direction and comprehensive communication. If this continues, you will have me longing for the economic “dynamism” of the Brezhnev years in the late Soviet Union as a source of inspiration (source: Wikipedia).




Ralf Grahn



P.S. A small, but dynamic team of journalists on European affairs can be found on Twitter @Europa451. Fernando Navarro, Jean-Sébastien Lefebvre, Julie Gonce and Francesca Barca write and collaborate to distribute articles on their European blog through websites in French, Spanish and Italian. The contents are similar, but not exact copies.

The Europa451 collective is doing a great job, with the Spanish blog the most active during the last seven days.



The number of Euroblogs is still on the increase. There are now 675 blogs on European Union and Council of Europe affairs listed on the multilingual blog aggregator Bloggingportal.eu. A few more voluntary editors are needed to get the daily posts tagged. Join the team and see Europe in all its splendour and misery!

Saturday, 16 October 2010

Mathew Lowry and Michael Malherbe improving Mediacafé?

The well intentioned Brussels event Mediacafé “Europe: no medium, no message?” on 18 October 2010 may actually become a better event, if the organisers and panellists take care to read and reflect on the blog post by Mathew Lowry and the comments: Oh, so it’s the media’s fault noone likes the EU … (15 October 2010).



Add a few salient points by Michael Malherbe on Se former à la communication européenne in: Que fait l’UE pour adapter sa communication à l’Internet mobile ? (13 October 2010).

A few more blog entries to peruse on both blogs, for those with the time and inclination, and some constructive thoughts might start to surface, possibly even a few with relevance for 501 million EU citizens, most of them mentally and geographically far from the “Brussels Bubble”.

It is never too late to start imagining a better life, but online media, social media, mobile media and professional journalism are all part of it, even with regard to communication by the EU institutions.




Ralf Grahn

Monday, 4 October 2010

Europe 2020 website: From deplorable to absolute disgrace

Macro-economic and fiscal stability, as well as growth-enhancing reforms are the make or break priorities for the European Commission. At EU level the Commission promises, among other things, to unleash the potential of the internal market through a Single Market Act.



All in all, the member states work on the basis of ten integrated guidelines, to be ‘localised’ in national Stability and Convergence Programmes SCPs, based on the Stability and Growth Pact SGP, and National Reform Programmes NRPs which aim to improve growth potential.



The Commission has promised seven flagship initiatives concerning EU level action.



Action and communication

On the Commission’s Europe 2020 strategy website there is now an undated, but useful document on the governance, tools and policy cycle of Europe 2020, but otherwise there is only one last update from 19 July 2010 regarding research funding and a previous press release with the integrated guidelines regarding economic policy and growth reforms (13 July 2010).



These are the only developments I notice since my 10 July 2010 blog post about the EU2020 flagship initiative Youth on the Move, when I called the state of the Commission’s central website for the Europe 2020 strategy deplorable.

The website does not redirect the visitor to a new and better portal for the Europe 2020 strategy. There are neither descriptions nor links to what has been going on since then, except for the three documents mentioned.

About twelve weeks from the previous blog post, by early October 2010, the Commission’s EU2020 website can only be called an absolute disgrace.

It is an elementary rule that action and communication have to advance hand in hand.

The Commission cannot rely solely on the charm of president Barroso. Neither can it let each Commissioner and Commission service communicate as best it can, without pulling together all the plans, proposals, speeches, interviews, discussions, decisions and actions into a meaningful whole.

There has to be one central portal where macro-economic and growth-reforms, at EU level and national level, are presented comprehensively and with daily updates. The Commission as a body must take ownership of both substance and presentation of its key strategies during this formative phase, in a dynamic manner and readable for EU citizens.

Enough time has been wasted.




Ralf Grahn


P.S. Comments relevant to the topic discussed in each Grahnlaw blog post are most welcome. However, the number of spam comments keeps skyrocketing. This is the sad reason for comment moderation, so it may take a while before your valued comment appears.



It is easier to understand a language than to use it correctly. As Eurobloggers we could and should promote interaction among Europeans across linguistic and national borders. We can link to blogs and other sources in foreign languages and share different viewpoints with our readers, perhaps explaining the gist of the arguments. Check out Bloggingportal.eu, the multilingual aggregator for blogs related to the European Union and the Council of Europe.

Another opportunity is to invite comments in different languages, those we are able to read or by using machine translation to understand the essentials.

Grahnlaw has adopted a multilingual comment policy:

I do my best to read comments in Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Spanish or Swedish, even if the Grahnlaw blog and my possible replies are in English.

Wednesday, 8 September 2010

Cheering crowds? Barroso’s EU “State of the Union” address

In the United States of America with a population of 310 million (Wikipedia), President Barack Obama’s first State of the Union address drew 48 million television viewers, according to USA Today.

With the same 15.5 per cent of the 501 million population of the European Union, about 78 million EU citizens would have followed the “State of the Union” speech by Commission President José Manuel Barroso.



Before the “big speech” I remarked on the constitutional difference between the powers and the election of the President of the USA versus the position of the European Commission in the “institutional triangle”. In the USA, the State of the Union speech is enshrined in the Constitution, while in the European Union you have to struggle to find a legal base. (I am still waiting for clarifications promised from the European Parliament.)

When the chiefs of the EU Commission and the European Parliament felt the pressure to draw a decent crowd among 736 MEPs, they panicked.



In How many presidents does it take to run Europe? (7 September 2010), The Economist’s new Charlemagne noted how Nigel Farage, of the Europe of Freedom and Democracy (EFD) group and UKIP, seized on the constitutional differences and the viewer numbers between the USA and the EU.



The European Parliament’s press release, State of the (E)Union: The Europe of today and tomorrow debated in the EP, mentions no figures for viewers on the EP’s own channel europarltv, nor did I find any statistics regarding the session elsewhere on the EP website.



We can only speculate that EP Live may have experienced a peak of viewers because of the hyped name and the critical discussion preceding the “State of the Union” address, but how many thousands would we speak about?.



Despite the absence of cheering (or jeering) crowds, “Séance en direct” is an important public service, giving EU citizens online access to the plenary sessions – live or recorded - of the European Parliament in the original language and 22 other language channels. Agendas and documents complement the supply, which guarantees a certain level of transparency in EU affairs.




Ralf Grahn